Another assault on free will
You are not reponsible enough to govern your own life. You cannont make decisions that are good for you. You cannot manage your money, drive an earth friendly car. You do not have the intellegence to live your life with out the comfort or responsibility of big brother there to look out for your better interest.
Lets just face it as a society we just cannot function unless the left tells us when to breath.
Ok now thats out of my system what in the world am I talking about. Well it started with the regulation of smokers to a third class citizen status. You can't smoke inside. You can only smoke in desginated areas. In some places you can not smoke in your car or even in your own home (apartment or as back east in New Hampshire I believe, it is your house).
After the false junk science on second hand smoke. All of which has been proven false. Just google WHO (world health organization), read their findings. SECOND HAND SMOKE DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER.
Then we had the assault on what vehicale you drive. Your a nazi and hate mother earth if you dare to drive an SUV. you are propollution, antigreen. You are not recucleing and it is adding to global warming, yadda yadda.
Now the fight for decideing what to eat and where to eat has opened a new front. For several years we have been told that eating fast food , fried foods are bad for you. Well anything in mass quantity is bad for you, duuuuh.
SO the regulations went into effect because the "health concerned gurus" wanted it to. Charts and labels telling you how many calories are in the fries,or the apple pie.
Now the front of this war on your right to eat an unhealthy meal once in a while because you feel like it has moved to Southern L.A.
Panel OKs one-year ban on new fast-food restaurants in South L.A.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fastfood23-2008jul23,0,6631786.story
(Here is the excerp of the story that you should read with dread. The defineing of a fast food establishment.)
Los Angeles, defines a fast-food restaurant as "any establishment which dispenses food for consumption on or off the premises, and which has the following characteristics: a limited menu, items prepared in advance or prepared or heated quickly, no table orders and food served in disposable wrapping or containers."
Huh? What? Sounds like all resturants are included in this because at any resturant you can take home a doggie bag. This means the left over food is placed in a platic/styrafoam container. This falls under their definition.
In the last paragraph it is mentioned the whole key to this issue. It os not about eating healthy. making a choice on whether or not you know what to eat. Lets face it every body knows that a continuous menu of fast food is bad, yet an occasional stop by for the convienance of not cooking is ok. But the bottom line to this war on fast food is the same as it was on the Tobacco industry. It is all about the benjamins.
Sure it is being sugar coated (no pun intended), as a health crisis. Which it is not. A war against obesety, again it is not. It is a war on any capitolism.
Last paragraph, last sentance:
But a much higher percentage of restaurants in South L.A. belong to fast-food chains, and the area has far fewer grocery stores than other parts of town.
So it is the fault of the fast food industry that grocery stores are not in south L.A. HAWGWASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once again by spinning the truth and discrediting an industry. The left are slowly taking away our rights to choice, and how to live. Who really is the facist here? the conservative who promotes capitolistic competion? Or the left who want to dictate how you live, and redistribute money.
Lets just face it as a society we just cannot function unless the left tells us when to breath.
Ok now thats out of my system what in the world am I talking about. Well it started with the regulation of smokers to a third class citizen status. You can't smoke inside. You can only smoke in desginated areas. In some places you can not smoke in your car or even in your own home (apartment or as back east in New Hampshire I believe, it is your house).
After the false junk science on second hand smoke. All of which has been proven false. Just google WHO (world health organization), read their findings. SECOND HAND SMOKE DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER.
Then we had the assault on what vehicale you drive. Your a nazi and hate mother earth if you dare to drive an SUV. you are propollution, antigreen. You are not recucleing and it is adding to global warming, yadda yadda.
Now the fight for decideing what to eat and where to eat has opened a new front. For several years we have been told that eating fast food , fried foods are bad for you. Well anything in mass quantity is bad for you, duuuuh.
SO the regulations went into effect because the "health concerned gurus" wanted it to. Charts and labels telling you how many calories are in the fries,or the apple pie.
Now the front of this war on your right to eat an unhealthy meal once in a while because you feel like it has moved to Southern L.A.
Panel OKs one-year ban on new fast-food restaurants in South L.A.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fastfood23-2008jul23,0,6631786.story
(Here is the excerp of the story that you should read with dread. The defineing of a fast food establishment.)
Los Angeles, defines a fast-food restaurant as "any establishment which dispenses food for consumption on or off the premises, and which has the following characteristics: a limited menu, items prepared in advance or prepared or heated quickly, no table orders and food served in disposable wrapping or containers."
Huh? What? Sounds like all resturants are included in this because at any resturant you can take home a doggie bag. This means the left over food is placed in a platic/styrafoam container. This falls under their definition.
In the last paragraph it is mentioned the whole key to this issue. It os not about eating healthy. making a choice on whether or not you know what to eat. Lets face it every body knows that a continuous menu of fast food is bad, yet an occasional stop by for the convienance of not cooking is ok. But the bottom line to this war on fast food is the same as it was on the Tobacco industry. It is all about the benjamins.
Sure it is being sugar coated (no pun intended), as a health crisis. Which it is not. A war against obesety, again it is not. It is a war on any capitolism.
Last paragraph, last sentance:
But a much higher percentage of restaurants in South L.A. belong to fast-food chains, and the area has far fewer grocery stores than other parts of town.
So it is the fault of the fast food industry that grocery stores are not in south L.A. HAWGWASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once again by spinning the truth and discrediting an industry. The left are slowly taking away our rights to choice, and how to live. Who really is the facist here? the conservative who promotes capitolistic competion? Or the left who want to dictate how you live, and redistribute money.