Let freedom ring! Let the rule of the people by the people and for the people come forth and govern under a Constitution that is not being perverted and destroyed. That's right the people of Honduras have spoken. Not quietly either. they have united their voices in a democratic fashion and spoken, NO COMMUNISM, NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEADERSHIP!

In an election that the current United States Presidential administration , state department, and dictatorial oppressive leaders through out South and Latin America do not like. Honduras has held fast under international pressure and voted the communist Zelaya out!

In case you did not know or forgot. Zelaya was once the President of Honduras. However he was LEGALLY ousted for trying to change the Constitution of Honduras. The Constitution allows for only one term for President and forbids it to be changed. Thus eliminating any sort of power grab by by people like Zelaya. He however tried to defy the Constitution and his own communist party helped to oust him. This created an international scandal. The scandal being that Obama and Hillary backed Zelaya and his illegal power grab. Calling for a stoppage in foreign aid by the United States and other governments until the illegal Zelaya was placed back into power.

Of coarse Hugo Commie Chavez supported Zelaya along with Castro from Cuba, Amadinjhad from Iran and other dictators and anti Democratic oppressors from though out the world. That is why this election results are so special and important. It shows that even under extreme international pressure to place this thug back into power. Under a special election the people spoke and refused him by voting him out. Or you could say refused to vote him back into office.

For a much more indepth coverage of this. GO to Atlas Shrugs. Pamela Gellar as always has the skinny on the deception we get from the MSM here and as to the whole situation.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/obama-and-chavez-backed-zelaya-repudiated-in-today-honduras-election.html

SO you think America is doing the right thing by having civil trials for these degenerate goat herders. You think we as a nation are tough on Terrorism. let us kick back for a bit and put our feet on the table. Get a cup of coffee and watch how the tracking and persecution of murderers is done.

A second bombing of a public train in Russia has been committed by what appears to be Muslims. Watch how the Russians pursue these thugs, thieves and Murderers. There will be no public trial and platform for the terrorist to spout their propaganda from. the Russians will not worry about the terrorist rights. they will pursue and punish accordingly for the crimes these low life's commit.

I have done some reading over the Thanksgiving Holiday and found some interesting things to compare and thought I should share them. It is about the Environmentalism movement.

Let us look at the following here.

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.

The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.

If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.

We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.


There is a group of wannabe "warrior society" that takes a "by any means necessary" approach to "defending mother earth." The group declines to participate in the democratic process, preferring instead to damage, disable, and destroy the property of its ever-growing list of enemies. EF! targets include, but are by no means limited to, loggers, ranchers, and farmers -- especially those who grow genetically modified crops. Earth First!ers' crimes include assault, arson, and untold acts of sabotage. ( from the Earth First web page http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/271 ) That seem to take the last paragraph above and are trying to live it.

Here are some quotes form rather famous, so called intelligent, well known people. Their quotes are related directly to the opening paragraphs in red.

I think it is man made. I think it's clearly man made. If you don't understand what the cause is, it's virtually impossible to come up with a solution. We know what the cause is. The cause is man made. That's the cause. That's why the polar icecap is melting. Joe Biden

Business is recognizing the role it can play in combating climate change. Thank God, is all I can say, for there is a desperately urgent need for business to play that role. Your lobbying influence can be substantial, but together, united and in large enough numbers it could prove decisive in turning the tide. Prince Charles

Renewable energy is proven technology, the price is dropping, the rest of the world is going that way, that's where our investment should be going as well. Bob Brown

If the firms that employ an increasing majority of the population are driven solely to satisfy the owner's greed at the expense of working conditions, of the stability of the community, and of the health of the environment, chances are that the quality of our lives will be worse than it is now. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

There are many who still do not believe that global warming is a problem at all. And it's no wonder: because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere. Al Gore

Do you see a pattern here. A common thread that goes from the first red paragraphs to the quotes. Technology is evil and man is the cause of wrongs. That there should be a change, call for a new structure and appreciation to nature?

Now here is the part I found shocking. If you consider the fact that the man who wrote the first paragraphs has been deemed by psychologists, psychiatrists, members of the F.B.I, and many others to be certifiable crazy. Does it not seem strange that these others who share the same position of technology and the environment are considered to be progressive and deep thinkers?

So who wrote the words I relate these progressives to? It is a man who who was on the F.B.I most wanted list and terrorised this nation for years. It is Theodore Kaczynski the Unabomber.

It is the first five paragraphs from his manifesto. ( http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt )

I have to ask then. If Ted kaczynski is a nutbag, then why are these others not considered nutbags and possible murders to be?

So it is black Friday. Why is it called black Friday? I understand black Monday in October. the day the stock market crashed in the depression. Yet today is not a day that even comes close to that. I have the news on and no one is jumping from windows because their stocks have plummeted. Today is the big shopping day.

It is supposed to be the start of the Holiday Season. A time to rejoice at the birth of our savior. A time for us to remember why Christ died on the cross for us and gave us a new lease on the after life. I see no blackness in this, do you?

As we begin our new found race to purchase items for the holidays. The day after we give thanks for those who came before us, those who defend us, and to those for what ever reason we deem enhanced our little lives. May we not forget the true meaning of the holiday season and its real message for us. Not the giving and receiving of gifts but the celebration of the life over two thousand years ago of a little boy born in a manger. How his life has changed ours for the better, and how we can honor his teachings.

Is it time to boycott certain companies? Why am i even asking this question you ask. I ask it because now that it seems Thanksgiving is over (although it hasn't even had kickoff for the football games). We see nothing but Christmas commercials on television. The assault upon Christian values is in high drive. No longer is it "Merry Christmas", but happy holidays is the accepted p.c. term.

Some school districts are not even allowing Christmas parties for the students, yet the district sure is going to take the days off with pay for the Christian holiday.

So what is there to boycott? Well how about certain companies that have changed the holiday from Christian to Muslim in their advertising of sales. Companies like Best Buy. This company has purposefully and deliberately aimed their advertising towards the muslim community. Why I ask? Are not Christians good enough for their own holiday now? Or is it part of the larger kowtowing to Islam by the west we are seeing here?

I would love to say it is just a sales gimmick and nothing to it. However there is much more to it. We s=not only see Islam creeping into western society, but into the legal system as well. Areas of Michigan recognise sharia law for muslims over the Constitution and law of this land.

We have a President that leans toward the Koran instead of the Bible. His very actions of supposedly indifference do not hide his bias towards Islam and its oppressive ways.

The allowing of prosecution of the military in a time of war for alleged crimes against known terrorist. Whom by the way under the Geneva convention rate only a firing squad upon capture. Look it up, under spies and terrorist in the articles for prisoners of war. The lack, or sow of piss poor leadership and decision making during a time of war for support and command of our troops in a combat zone.

Did Best Buy take their lead from this in their decision to promote Islam over Christian beliefs? It appears to be so. Does this mean we should boycott them for it. Yes it does. It is time that the Judea Christian values that this country was based upon be shoved back to the forefront of our morals.

All we here from the bleeding heart apologist is that we are going to show the world that the American legal system is fair and that we hold our morals to be above all else. So why has the President , Attorney General and others in this administration purposely tainted the jury pool?

Any day one law student should be able to argue successfully that the terrorist cannot receive a fair trail and that under the law rights for the average citizens have been trampled upon. No Miranda readings, no quick trial, no habeous corpus for the goat herders at all. This case is tainted from top to bottom and the defendants, though murderous scum, must be released.

If I was the judge in this case I would bring the defendants to the front of the court house and hold a press conference. There I would list the violations committed by Eric Holder and the current administration in the handling of this procedural fiasco. Then I would order the court officers to release the terrorist then and there on the street.

I would order the police and the court officers to step aside and not hinder the terrorist as they tried to leave New York and this country.

Of coarse I would make it very clear to all in attendance of the press conference and watching/listening that these thugs were loose on the street and would be leaving. The goal would be for the terrorist to get out of New York before real justice could be exacted upon them from the American populace.

Reps Obey and Levin have clearly a different concept of understanding of the Constitution then what I was taught in civics class.

Amendment XVI, ratified February 3Rd 1913, states the following:

The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

This amendment does not state that the taxes collected should only be upon a certain segment of the people. It just states that the basis of the tax does not have to be based on any certain criteria. It would seem to me that any tax proposed on only one segment of the public is at the least unethical , and at the worst immoral.

The proposal is a 1% tax on the lowest incomes, moving upward to 5% on the more wealthy with an additional tax on those who make more then $200,000.00.

The president that appears to being established is that if you want a national defense it can be based upon your personal income, thus removing it from a military status to a hired mercenary organization.

Instead of "PROVIDING FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE" , this proposal smacks of protection for hire, and only to those who can afford it.

It has been leaked that now Obamanation will hold a press conference next week. Tuesday, December 1St to say he will send maybe 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan.

This is good news. It is late and piss poor in timing. It also shows more of President Obama's lack of leadership and understanding of real world crisis.

Let us hope and pray that our troops will get the aid and support they crucially need, and that this is not just a ploy from the left.

Here it comes. Obama and the left campaigned on the fact that the war on terror should be fought in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is their war like it or not. In March of 2009, shortly after settling into office President Obamanation said he had a plan for this battle and was going to implement it. In September of 2009 a request was made by Obama's pick of a commanding officer for more troops in a surge policy that worked in Iraq t be applied in Afghanistan. Here we are in November of 2009 and no decision on an increase of troops has been made yet another tax is being proposed for the American people.

Yes another tax. We are in a governmental sponsored bad economy. One that is being pushed with piss poor policies and ideas from the left to ruin this country and its economy for decades. Refusing to take responsibility for his decision and his WAR. Obama is going to propose more taxes on the wealthy to pay for a war. A war that is supposed to be protecting ALL OF AMERICA. Not just a select portion of the populace.

The TARP act was Bushes and arguably not a good thing. The stimulus and the continued bailout of wall street is Obama and the lefts. The war in Iraq is over and the clean up is moving along. The conflicts (war) that continues is the left and Obama's mess. No one elses. The blame game is tired and old.

It is time that we get some honesty from these BOZO'S in Washington. If Bill Clinton hadn't lied he may have a better persona with American people. Now that Obama denies all and lies from both sides of his mouth he has no respect from the voting constituents.

This new proposed tax is just the lefts way of reaching further into our pockets and STEAL our income, forcing us into indentured servitude to the left. There is NO need for this tax. A responsible government would cut their spending and have the funds. A responsible government would not be proposing a take over of one sixth of the economy and sending businesses into oblivion. A responsible government would encourage industry and entrepreneurship to help with fund raising for our troops.

NOT THIS LEFTIST government! It would rather demand and order a small section of the citizenry to pay for everything.

Is it time for a revolution? Taxation without responsible representation? It is definately time for a change, and for hope!

This is incredible. An elementary schoolchild is able to understand this so why can't the government.

Look if I tell you you are going to spend X, but wait that is too much money. So let us spend Y.
The difference of Y - X = Z. Z is the amount we are going to save by spending Y instead of X.

Looks simple does it not? Here is the problem. X is the same as Y. They are both an increase in spending. I say that again. THEY ARE BOTH AN INCREASE IN SPENDING. It does not matter if we spend X or Y, they both are increase in monies we do not have. Z does not exist. It is a fictitious number thrown out to divert your attention from the fact that spending is increasing period.

It dose not matter if it is the House or the Senates version of health care. They both are an increase in spending. There is no SAVINGS on any of these plans. DO you understand this people?