Monday, March 29, 2010 

The spin in overdrive

The spin on health care is in overdrive as already here in Colorado we are being bombarded with thank you commercials for Rep. Markey and her selling out of her constituents.

All the points that are being made are lies and untruths concerning the ins and outs of this debacle. The fact we will not be keeping our own doctor after four years. Fact that Congress is not accepting the same medical plans being pawned of on the people. That they get to keep their Cadillac plans is omitted from any statements.

As we have already found out that children will not be immediately accepted and preexisting conditions are still being denied.

America is waking up to the Washington lies and come November they will be remembered.

Friday, March 26, 2010 

Obama and the economy busting budget

As we move day by painful day further into the demise of the American economy by President Obama and his leftist accomplices. More of the lies he speaks are being revealed. The latest is how his budget does not save money but sinks America and the American people further into oppression and danger of economic slavery.

According to the more in depth budget analysis by the C.B.O. The Obama budget sinks this country into a 90% debt of our G.D.P. buy the year 2020. Or in easier terms an additional $10,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.

( )

CBO’s analysis indicates that if the President’s proposals were enacted:

The federal government would record deficits of $1.5 trillion in 2010 and $1.3 trillion in 2011. Those deficits would amount to 10.3 percent and 8.9 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), respectively. (The deficit in 2009 totaled 9.9 percent of GDP.) Compared with CBO’s current-law baseline projections, deficits under the President’s proposals would be about 2 percentage points of GDP higher in fiscal years 2011 and 2012, 1.3 percentage points greater in 2013, and above baseline levels by growing amounts thereafter. By 2020, the deficit would reach 5.6 percent of GDP, compared with 3.0 percent under CBO’s baseline projections.

Under the President’s budget, debt held by the public would grow from $7.5 trillion (53 percent of GDP) at the end of 2009 to $20.3 trillion (90 percent of GDP) at the end of 2020, about $5 trillion more than under the assumptions underlying the baseline. Net interest would more than quadruple from 1.4 percent of GDP in 2010 to 4.1 percent in 2020 in nominal dollars (without an adjustment for inflation).

Revenues under the President’s proposals would be $1.4 trillion (or 4 percent) below CBO’s baseline projections from 2011 to 2020, largely because of the President’s proposals to index the thresholds for the alternative minimum tax for inflation starting at their 2009 levels and to extend many of the tax reductions enacted in 2001 and 2003 that are scheduled to expire at the end of 2010. Other proposals in the President’s budget—including those associated with significant changes in the nation’s health insurance system—would, on net, increase revenues.

Mandatory outlays under the President’s proposals would be above CBO’s baseline projections by $1.9 trillion (or 8 percent) over the 2011–2020 period, about one-third of which would stem from net additional spending related to proposed changes to the health insurance system and health care programs. Discretionary spending under the President’s budget would be about $0.3 trillion (or 2 percent) lower than the cumulative amount between 2011 and 2020 in CBO’s baseline, reflecting reduced funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This is Obama's and the Democrats deficit. They made it , they own it. There is no denying that single handily they are sinking this country economically.


Bounties for Gangs?

Is it time to bring back the "wanted dead or alive " bounties for gangs and their members who are actively attempting to murder police officers?

In California we have a motorcycle gang that has openly declared war on the police in and near Hemet California. In Texas near El Paso the word is out to law enforcement to be careful as gangs are going to start targeting them. We already have seen the full out blitzkrieg by Mexican drug cartels against anyone and everyone who even looks wrong at them.

So is it time to bring back "Wanted Dead or Alive" bounties to vigilantes who bag these thugs?
How different is it really from the bounties offered now for those who skip bail and the bail bondsmen who hire bounty hunters to get their investments back? Is it not the same as our society crumbles into a moral and social war of the haves and have not?

We already see the division of "we have the power and you do not" elitism of Washington. As leftists force their will on the people of this country. Do the people still have the faith in the system to protect them and keep them safe form the thugs who target law enforcement. What is to prevent them from walking into your home and taking it over for their criminal pursuits? If government is to busy lining their pockets with our hard money, while limiting the actions of the law in a perverted political correct process of the lefts version of equality.

Do the people still have the right to defend themselves and for how long? After amnesty for millions of law breakers, what is next on the left agenda. The repeal of the second amendment? So if we bring back bounties of "dead or alive" can we feel safer or keep what may be left of our country safe?

Just asking.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010 

Colorado Senators Udall, Bennet support sex offenders

In a complete partisan vote, Colorado Senators Mark Udall and Michael Bennet vote in favor to support the grey area of the Health Care bill that would let convicted sex offenders the ability to get prescription erectile dysfunction drugs.

The Coburn Amendment which would have disallowed sex offenders from slipping through the cracks, the ability to legally get hold of drugs that benefit their deviant behavior. The so called Viagra vote. The Democratic Senators voted 57 to 42 to shelve the amendment. A simple fix that would have eased a little of the pressure from the public about this fiasco of oppression being passed off as health care. Yet Senators Udall and Bennet chose to play party lines and allow this grey area a pass. Instead of taking the step to help insure a stoppage of deviant criminal behavior. The Democrats chose to take the lead of the left and not try to fix a known problem.

By shelving this amendment they are allowing this grey area to remain grey and for felons to get hold of substances that will enhance their criminal behavior. It is not a bold step in showing how they are looking out for the American people . It is however a clear demonstration of party trumps the safety of the people.

As claims of political games are being bandied about. The truth of the matter is that even though the Republicans may be trying to throw a monkey wrench into this piss poor bill. Certain proposals are being given that would make this bill less expensive and better to the people.

It is those on the Democratic side, or the left that are refusing to improve this bill all in order to lay claim to being part of the destruction of this country. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet are standing arm in arm with those people. Party politics over the will of the people.

Michael Bennet an appointee to the seat once held by the leftist Ken Salazar, now Sec. of the Interior. Is up for election this coming November. If he supports erectile dysfunction drugs for convicted sex offenders, what else does he support that goes against common sense and endangers the people?


Threats against Congressional Members

Congressional members who supported the Unconstitutional Law of Obamacare are now claiming that they are getting threats against them Rep. Steny Hoyer has given a press conference denouncing that the safety of a democracy does not operate under coercion.

What are the specific threats? Well no one knows. No specific threat has been released. The implication is to the safety of the families and personal being of certain Representatives is clear. Yet like the claims of racial epitaphs being said to certain members of Congress has no audio clips backing up the claim.

So what are these threats? More then likely they are along the line of "Your career in politics is over," or possible "you have signed your political death by supporting this bill." All of which is true. As the people of this nation are not standing for this oppression of our freedom of choice.

The MSM, along with all liberals, are making a huge push to label the Tea Party as nothing but right wing racists. So now the claims of threats will be thrown in the mix to more stigmatize the average American who does not support socialism.

I say to the American people, continue to call and scold your elected officials. Let them know that their time in Washington is over. I would caution that a better phrasing of here is your pink slip , there is the door now use it be considered.

I would temper my words to the elected officials to lean more to the unemployment line and not the cemetery , unless this is where their political careers is going. A political grave yard where only Gary Hart and Pat Schroeder are vaguely remembered.

The second Revolution has been started. The first battle belongs to the liberal America haters , but the war is far from over.

Friday, March 19, 2010 

Colorado demonstrates Arrogance

The people of Colorado need to really wake up and take a hard look at those in elected office right now. For those who are up for reelection, they need to worry.

Sen. Udall, Sen. Bennet, Rep Markey, Rep Perlmutter, Rep. Polis, Rep Salazar, are helping to lead the way to pass the scam known as Health Care.

Rep. Polis states his ignorance on not only the Constitution and parliamentary procedure, but what the good people of Colorado want.

Polis recently said that he does not understand why some people are so upset about a proposal for the House to pass the Senate version of the health care legislation without voting on it separately. He says – either way – members will be given their say.

If members are to be given their say, then why are meetings being held behind closed doors? Why is the minority party being shut out of debate? There is no say on this bill. It is clearly a one sided discussion.

Why people are upset is simple you dolt. The Constitution requires a vote on a bill before it becomes law. No where does it ALLOW the passing of legislation with out a vote. It is clearly UN Constitutional to do so. But does this matter to these bureaucrats? In a single word NO, they do not care. It is more important to these buffoons to pass something be it good or bad, regardless of what the people think and want.

Thursday, March 18, 2010 

Time to March

If the cry once was the "British are coming" to raise patriots from their beds and defend this country the cry now is "THE LEFTIST ARE HERE!"

It is time to stand and show the elitist i Washington that it is the people who run this country and that we allow them to govern on our whim, not they allow us to exist on their whim.

This Saturday, the 20Th of March a call is being made for as many Americans who still believe in America to come to Washington and be heard. I do mean be heard at the top of your lungs. Bring your voice, signs, anything you can to be heard. Let these leftist know that Liberty is American, not a foreign belief and pipe dream.

If you cannot make it it is time to light up the phones once again and send the message that a vote for "deem and pass" is a vote for oppression and is UN Constitutional.

Call: 877-762-8762 or 202-224-3121 or 202-225-3121 flood Capitol Hill with the message of freedom not oppression. Let the fat cats know that America is the people, not a few ideologues.

See you Saturday in Washington!!!!!


Cannabis for everyone

Cannabis for every one is the next entitlement we will have shoved down our throats. For those who say it is the only thing that helps is a cop out. For every report that says medicinal pot helps there are two reports that show how bad for you and non helpful smoking pot is.

A fact that the smoke from smoking cannabis is four times harder on the lungs then a non filtered cigarette is not discussed or even considered. The fact that second hand smoke from smoking cannabis is more offensive then cigarette smoke is not discussed.

Marijuana takes a full 27 days to work its way out of ones system in the body. Just a fact of life for those who still have to take a drug test for their job. It works on a increasing presence in the body. This means over a period of time one needs more and more to reach the same level of mental lapse that accrues with this mind altering drug. Yes a mind altering drug. This drug kills brain cells faster then a beer does.

So as one sits there and makes themselves literally stupider. They destroy brain cells , ruin their lungs and become more and more a burden on others. If anyone disputes this look at those who are serious users of marijuana. Their speech is slurred, reaction times are decreased, and basic thought processes are disrupted.

The problem with this is those who use and abuse this drug are literally blinded and do not see the effects upon themselves from its use. Just try to hold an intelligent conversation with a user. Not so easy, it is like talking to a drunk looking for a fight.

The ramifications of legalising this drug is enormous. Just think about it. There are jobs that require a clear mind and control of your body, yet if we legalise this mind altering drug how can we deny those in these positions their right to get stoned? I do not know about you, but the last thing i want is to have to go into surgery under Obama care with a doctor who is under the influence of pot. Then to argue that we can place time limits on when one can use before they work creates all sorts of problems. This would be saying that under Obama care where you will have to wait, and wait for a scheduled procedure will be hampered by at least another 20 plus days because your surgeon got stoned on his weekend in Acapulco.

What about the fireman or the police officer. O.M.G., think about it if you have to go in front of a Judge who is stoned. It is unfair as it is to go in front of a judge who legislates from the bench but what if he is stoned too?

There are much more safer and less destructive alternatives to smoking pot. Yet the peace pot and micro dot generation wants us to believe that there is not. A full out offensive to legalise drugs is on. An illegal escape from reality turned legal is what these people want. A self indulged entitlement to get stupid at others expense is the desired effect.

As more and more States legalise medicinal pot, the problems increase. Non smokers beware, that is non pot smokers. While you have to go outside in the rain and snow to have a legal cigarette, these people will be allowed to smoke in non smoking buildings and public places because they will have a chit from a questionable doctor that says they can. While many apartment and condos are forcing people to quit smoking because they find second hand smoke offensive, what will they do with second hand pot smoke? Nothing because it will be a medical reason and discriminatory to make them go outside.

Life is a four letter word and it is not fair. However legalising pot is just plain stupid. Talk about catering to a select group of people this is it.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010 

Personal responsibility out, entitlements in

Seeing how personal responsibility is out and entitlements are in. I have a list of entitlements I want. Seeing ow big government seems to think that we are not able to think and provide for ourselves then I want the following. All of which will reduce stress in my life and make things better for me. After all is this not the government of me, me, me.

1) Six months of paid vacation, meaning that I get all expenses paid for while collecting a check to be on vacation.

2) To never have to pay for an airline flight again. It should be free and I am entitled to ride in first class when and to where I want.

3) Free fuel for my vehicle. After all Congress has said that driving is like health care and is a human right. There fore to be able to drive I want my fuel for free. It is only fair after all.

4) My new home, after all is not shelter /a place to live a human right as well? I want a 30,000 square foot home with a pool, three car garage , private gym, gated yard, in home theatre system (just in case I do not feel like going to a free movie at the mall).

5) I am entitled to drive on the opposite side of the street if it means my drive is easier to make.

6) I am entitled to a 7 digit income on a corporate job I have no idea as to do. With a cushy retirement after 4 years . Just like all the elected officials in Washington.

7) I am entitled to the same health care coverage that my elected officials get.

8) I am entitled to $400.00 KOBE steak just like Obama, anytime I want.

My list goes on and on. Seeing we are now begining to live in the entitlement era. Then why should I not have these things. After all I am entitled arn't I?


Should Obama be Impeached?

Is it time that we the people consider putting the pressure on members Of Congress and the Senate to begin investigating grounds for impeachment of President Obama , along with members of the House and the Senate leadership?

What are the grounds for impeachment?

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

According to Constitutional Lawyers,
"High Crimes and Misdemeanors" are (1) real criminality -- breaking a law; (2) abuses of power; (3) "violation of public trust" as defined by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers.

Exceeding the constitutional bounds of the powers of the office.

Behavior grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office.

Employing the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.

So far we have no real evidence of criminality or bribery. Despite the obvious on this health care arm twisting and back room promises we really cannot say ion a court of law yet that President Obama has violated the law. I am sure that after the 2010 election and removal of so many liberal leftists we will see the evidence come forth in the job placement of these abusers of power.

Has the Presidents behavior been incompatible with the standards of office? In many ways yes. An excessive party lifestyle and jet setting across the globe on non official jaunts to Europe, the Middle East and soon the Orient. An abusive use of Air Force Once to chauffeur his family on vacation at the tax payers expense is just a minor abuse. The alienation of long time friends and allies to this country are more in line with inappropriate behavior. Although his personal attitude when it comes to members of the opposing party and those who dissent with his ideology fits the bill.

The using of his office for improper gain is very reasonable and definitely needs to be looked into. Certain dealings in real estate, marketing of certain industries in which he like Al Gore have a personal financial stake in.

The lack of concern over those who are trying to kill us, subjugate the Southwest under another nations flag, and the support for international thugs all speak highly of a lack of character on Obama's part. This country was warned about this before the election but refused to believe.

Members of the House need to be looked at as well.

Nancy Pelosi and the clear abuse of her privileges on a personal jet paid for and provided by the American taxpayer so that she can jet to and from California is one of her abuses. As the health entitlement debacle moves forward more and more crimes I am sure will come to light. The subversive end run on the Constitution, and the arm twisting and bribery to get votes.

Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Charlie Rangle, the ethics committee members who refused to look into their violations of ethics, morals, and rules while in office.

Senator harry Reid , his conduct, real estate dealings, and backroom meetings are demanding investigation as well.

The sure incompetence of the cabinet, the illegal Czars and hidden payroll, along with just what is their agenda. These need to be looked into and investigated. All of this leads back to President Obama.

There should be no doubt or argument as to an investigation and preliminary hearings on impeachment.

Will this happen? Doubtful as we are oppressed with a leftist government hell bent on destroying this country at all costs. Especially at the cost of the Constitution.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010 

Tom Hanks, imbecile, liar, or racist

Tom Hanks is either a complete imbecile and ignorant of facts. Or Tom Hanks is himself a racist. For a man who claims to have talked and spoken to many who served and were involved with the Second World War, he must not have listened to what they said.

Tom did you not learn about how the Japanese Ambassador and an aid, visited the White house minutes before the bombing of a little place called Pearl Harbor? Did you not learn of the Imperial Japanese expansion in the Pacific? Are you selectively ignoring the rape of Nan kin China by the Japanese? Did you not learn of how the Japanese systematically tried to exterminate the Korean people and their society and history from the memory of history?

Tell me Mr. Hanks if the second world war was a race war then who started it? Are you saying that the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazi's started it? Or maybe you are implying that the more then 20 million Jews , Gypsy's, and fellow Russian countrymen murdered by Stalin started it. I am sure that those Philippine slaves of the Japanese Empire in Japan are not to blame when the Japanese invaded the country of the Philippines.

Wait maybe you are suggesting that Mexico, who unofficially supported Germany and entered talks on high government levels with Germany are to blame.

The omitted facts that the United States sent little aid to Europe, and though clearly did not support the war in Europe did all they could to stay out of hostilities until that little event in Hawaii. Gosh Tom how annoying that Pearl Harbor keeps getting in the way of your slant on history.

What a shame that the truth is still there. The fact that the Greatest Generation is getting smaller by the day. There are still enough vets at the V.F.W. who did serve and know the truth.

Tom Hanks is either willfully ignorant of the facts, and does not want to believe. Or in fact, like so many of the left in Hollywood. Is himself a racist against that genetic mixture referred to as mutts, because of the vast melting pot they come from. Tom Hanks is racist against Americans and nurtures deep resentment against a country and its people who have saved the World more times in its short history then any other from the beginning of recorded times.

Tom Hanks proves clearly that his foot is in his mouth and that he is indeed an imbecile.

Monday, March 15, 2010 

Thwart the will of the People

The cross roads are crossed. The gauntlet thrown down. Radical Socialist in government have said screw the people. We are seeing an absolute assault on the Constitution and all that has made this country over 200 years the envy of the world.

The leftists in Washington are going to jam down our throats the worst legislation ever proposed and send this country spiraling into a debt filled future that will take generations to fix. The lies of how this health care bill and how it will supposedly help those in this country does not even touch the reality of how this bill is going to enslave the over whelming majority. The fact that taxes across the board and job losses will sky rocket are ignored. The fact that small businesses will go out of business. Thus increasing unemployment along with the inevitable rise in those who will have to go on the doll to support their families is ignored.

Leftist in Washington do not care how this bill does not address the real problems of health care in this country. Their only concern is laying claim to having passed a debacle of red tape and higher taxes. Resulting in the destruction of the greatest country in history through indentured servitude to larger and more oppressive government.

We have been warned over and over again that the handouts known as the welfare state are going broke. Well it happened. Over the coarse of its abuse the Social Security program has already done so. Years before it was said to. Last moth pay outs grew larger then intake. Thus creating a new deficit in the entitlement system. By paying money to those who never paid in or met the qualifiers of the program our government stole our money.

Now the proposal of more handouts, and redistribution of wealth will create such a deficit as never before in history. Think about the numbers . It started out as only 10 to 12 million uninsured. Then the claim went to near 30 million uninsured. Still a percentage of less then 10% of the population. So the answer was to cut and restrict services to the other 90% of the population.

The truth that NO ONE IS DENIED MEDICAL TREATMENT in this country is perverted. The truth that after care and unrestricted lawsuits, combined with insurance restrictions nation wide prevent the after care needed in all cases is not even considered in this bill. The race to jam down the throats of Americans a program that does nothing but increase the coffers of the government is absurd and WRONG!

By passing and subverting the procedures, rules , and guidelines of the Constitution to pass a social feel good, do nothing program is as Anti American as the fascists and Nazi's in Washington. The process that is being used is an end run on the Constitution. It is exactly what the founding fathers wanted to prevent. An oppressive government on the people.

This bill, and the way it is being rammed through legislation is equal to a Constitutional amendment. It demands a state by state vote. Something that the leftist in Congress refuse to allow to happen.

A clear move by the left to take over this country and radically change all that once was good. Replacing it with all that has not worked and wrong in this world.

Instead of voting these cretins out of office, maybe it is time the people do what the colonists did. Drag these officials out of their offices kicking and screaming, then tar and feather them in the town square.

Friday, March 12, 2010 

More proof Dems want to hurt businesses

Colorado Senate Majority Leader John Morse distorts the truth and tries to convince the public that big business is evil. In a rant over the flap of Amazon pulling out of Colorado and eliminating their affiliate businesses here, John Morse cries foul.

After pushing through a tax on the Internet specifically aimed at Amazon and their profits. John Morse weeps over the fact that Amazon moves out of Colorado and the newly imposed tax will raise little to no monies for his increase in the welfare state.

Rule number one in business is "make money". If you are not going to make money you either fold up shop and go out of business or you move to where you can make money. This is what Amazon has decided to do. Move and make money. To go some where that they will not be penalized for operating a business. In this process they have had to down size. Meaning that they have cut losses. These losses are imposed upon the Colorado economy with job losses. Losses that the state government caused.

By penalising and taxing a business and forcing them to cut jobs you create unemployment. In an economy that is suffering from a rise in unemployment does it make any sense to put people on the doll and take money out of their pockets? No it does not, yet this is what John Morse has done and cries foul over.

With the Internet tax John Morse claims that Amazon owes money to the state. This is far from the truth as no money was owed until the bill became law. John Morse gives the impression that it is retroactive and passed profits are subject to tax. This is not the case nor should it ever be.

What has happened is that by imposing this tax Amazon has made the business decision to leave Colorado and its business associates. Thus putting a dent in the profits of those who worked with Amazon. A god move? Maybe, maybe not. However it is a reality of business. Profits drive business not pleasing local, state and federal governments. A responsibility is owed to stock holders and a professional attitude towards customers. There is no mandate or clause that says a business must please John Morse.

"I spent many years as a police officer and I have not seen such tyranny, such egregiousness, such retaliation, especially from a corporate customer that makes in excess of $900 million a year," fumed Morse in a self published video.

Again the spin on the truth is that the tyranny is coming from Colorado State Legislature not from the corporate Amazon. John Morse along with Democrats not only in this state but nationally are out to hurt businesses and are purposely creating unemployment and hindering the recovery of the economy.

John Morse, in m y opinion is arrogant and self serving. his agenda is UN American and anti Capitalist. This man and the agenda he pushes has got to go. It is time he receives his pink slip and looks for a new job in the down turned job market he help to create.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 

Fannie Mae and Colorado funds

We know for a fact that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a large reason as to why the housing bubble burst and that the economic problems that followed were a direct result of piss poor management and policies.

The policies of forcing lending businesses to loan money to those who were and are incapable of affording such moronic high loans. The policies of basically giving money knowing that it cannot be paid back is like throwing money out the window on the highway. So then why has the State of Colorado deemed it a good investment to put money into such a organization?It makes no sense fiscally at all. Especially when there are better and proven investments out there that will not be a bottomless pit.

This being said the next important question is when did government go into the business of making money? The have a continual source of income. Though it is supposed to be limited it is paid every year. The taxes charged by government for failed services is in the billions a year just in Colorado alone. Government should have a surplus of funds to cover emergencies. However they should not be in the process of making money. the only reason that they are doing this is to expand the welfare state. An expansion that is breaking the back of the taxpayer.

So if a State has made investments and is showing a profit? Why then are they pushing legislation to raise taxes and more money? Do they know something we do not, or that we should know?

Colorado has invested over 2 billion dollars, that's $2,000,000,000,00, in Fannie Mae. A company that has claimed bankruptcy and has not just once but twice been bailed out with federal money. Not only this but they have opened up their idiotic loan practices to make even more bad loans and are looking ant a third bankruptcy. The safety net for them is Barney Frank , who keeps handing over money to keep them solvent.

With over 2 billion dollars invested from Colorado one has to seriously wonder how bad of shape Fannie Mae is really in. Then one has to wonder why Colorado keeps this money in Fannie Mae. Should they not remove it and be responsible to Colorado tax payers and put this money into something safer, something that is not going to file bankruptcy and have to be bailed out yet again.

All this being said, the over reaching aspect of government trying to make money is just another example of how "We the People" have allowed corruption, fraud and greed to take hold of our State and Federal governments and put all of us at finical risk.

When government starts to run a deficit and considers raising taxes. It is time that they tighten their belts and consider reducing spending. This includes money being thrown away on the welfare state. The expansion of unemployment benefits only keeps people from finding work. The increase in handouts only makes people less likely to be self responsible and sufficient.

It unfortunately now has become a part of human nature to sit on our backsides and let someone else do the work. We must reduce government greed and spending. We must become more self reliant and do for ourselves.

Colorado is not broke yet. It soon will be if the same clowns are allowed to mismanage our future. It is time to clean house and put responsible leadership in place. Those who will help cut back on the welfare state and reduce irresponsible spending.

For a look at Colorado's fiances, click on the link.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010 

Vote Yes Dems, end your time in Washington

Yes, yes, yes vote for the health care debacle. Put this country out of our misery by ending your time in Washington. A yes vote will ensure that unless you represent a liberal , communist, or socialist district you will not be in office after your next election. Let the revolution begin. The American people have been saying NO, NO , NO o this indentured servitude called health care. yet the elite Democrats in Washington refuse to listen to those who are their EMPLOYERS.

Let the election revolution begin here and now. Vote yes on this P.O.S. bill and then stand by the door and wait for your pink slip.

Look they want to repackage this bill and claim that now 30 million people will get coverage. An increase of over 18 million from the time they first proposed this mess. The bottom line to this is the price tag. Forget about the truth of NO ONE IS DENIED HEALTH CARE IN THIS COUNTRY. Forget the convenient truth that the numbers of uninsured match the number of ILLEGAL ALIENS in this country. Ignore the claims that health care is not affordable in this country. Look at the cost that these IDIOTS in Washington are going to impose upon the American people irregardless of our wants.

The population in this country is over 300 million people. Less then 10% are said to be uninsured , however the bill to insure them is going to bankrupt this nation. A fact that the CBO has published on each and every proposal. Is the cost of insuring one out of ten worth losing our standard of living? Is the cost of insuring one out of ten worth the oppressive taxes that will be imposed?

The answer is a positive NO on each question. Many who do not have health insurance our gamblers and it is in a free country their choice at such. They will pay the bill if the get sick. If they cannot pay then there are already programs and plans in effect to set up ways to pay for the services that they receive. So why are members in Congress changing this? We are at war and in the middle of a politically made economic crisis. Do they not have enough to do as it is?

About me

  • I'm Devious Mind
  • From Denver, Colorado, United States
  • Good judgemnt comes from experiance. Experiance comes from bad judgement. Karma, its a bitch.
My profile
Powered by Blogger