Thursday, April 30, 2009 

ABC News, Obama, Endanger the lives of Hero's families and Heros

In the pursuit of false atrocities against those who would KILL every American if given the chance. ABC news under the guise of independent investigating. Take the lefts witch hunts and expose two American Heroes and their families to danger by releasing their names and where they are located.

The left and its allies in the MSM who want to castrate all American defense and tactics in the WAR AGAINST TERRORISM, have gone yet again over the line of common sense and good judgement. By exposing who and where these men live they have given the Islamofacists targets for their attacks against our offense and pursuit in topping them.

Who are these Heroes? Well I will not name them here or show their pictures. All I will say is that Drudge and ABC have it all. Now these men who designed and helped prevent another 9/11 attack and who knows what else are exposed to the radicals who call themselves a peace full religion.

Is , God forbid anything happens to these men and/or to their families the blood is on the hands of not only the traitors at ABC, but on President Obama and his cronies in Washington.

If there are any decent lawyers out there who still believe in America and those who willingly ready to do what has to be done so that we can sleep easy at night. Then they should get ready to take these TRAITORS to civil court and sue them for all their great great grandchildren will ever earn. Charges of complacency and will full negligence as well as sedition, and co conspirators in the harm of these Patriots.

This is not just an outrage but a crime against this country and all who serve to protect it. No wonder ABC is a dieing propaganda outlet.

 

Chrysler in a nutshell

President Obamanation is giving his speech on the Chrysler bankruptcy at the moment and to boil it down into a nut shell here is what has happened.

Obama did not like the fact Chrysler refused to meet his demands on them. So he has taken it upon himself to see that his idea of green automobiles are made. Obama has sold Chrysler to FIAT on his terms and not the majority of share holders terms. He has authorised an additional 8 billion dollars in loans to FIAT in order to keep Chrysler open. These loans are to be paid back before FIAT can take controlling interest in the company.

Again in a nut shell Obama sold Chrysler to FIAT. Chrysler was forced to sell.



If you have a company or are a share holder in a company better think about what to do with your stocks and money. This is a major power grab and illegal move by government to control the PRIVATE INDUSTRY in AMERICA.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 

From Indentured Servent to Slave

In less than 100 days the American worker has gone from an indentured servant to the government. To becoming a slave with future generations born into economic slavery for the left and their Utopian views of power over the people.

Today a very real and wrong budget was passed. This new budget will increase the national debt, cause more job losses and take more hard earned money out of the American citizens pocket to line the coffers of the bureaucrats in Washington D.C.

From Michelle Malkins blog:

The House of Representatives passed a $3.44 trillion budget resolution for fiscal year 2010 Wednesday, approving most of President Obama’s key spending priorities and setting the federal government in a new direction with major increases for energy, education and health care programs.The House on Wednesday approved a budget resolution measure by a vote of 233 to 193.

The resolution, which was approved by a vote of 233 to 193, passed in a virtual party-line vote. All but 17 House Democrats supported it, and no House Republicans voted in favor.

“Today, for the first time in many, many years, we have a president’s budget … that is a statement of our national values,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said during the final debate on the House floor.

“What is important to us as a nation is reflected in this budget. It’s a very happy day for our country.”

Not only is this a misrepresentation of values, but a theft from the American people.

One leftist on her blog had the following comment:

On April 29Th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

Here’s why people just don’t take the GOP seriously. For 8 years, all we heard was Dick Cheney saying “deficits don’t matter.” Then the GOP this year overwhelmingly supported Jim DeMint’s bill to lower the tax rate on the wealthiest Americans by 10%, which besides being a radical shift in the nation’s wealth to the rich also puts the country in trillions in more debt. And now you’re throwing all this “generational theft” garbage around because Democrats are irresponsible with our kids’ money? It doesn’t add up.
I’m here to help.

This man obviously missed the part where Obama's budget has doubled and is increasing the national debt.

Nancy Pelosi thinks that spend, spend, spend is a value? This woman is senile and for medical reasons should be removed from office.

 

Is it time to worry?

For the average American who goes about his/her life just doing their thing. Getting up in the morning , going to work, going to play on the weekends and enjoying their freedoms. Is it time for them to worry about their freedoms? Yes it is time to worry and it is time to be concerned about what is happening in Washington D.C.

Now that the Socialist have control of two out of three government entities, the Legislative and the executive. How long before they end up with controlling interest in the Judicial branch of government? When this and if this happens, the trifecta will be complete and an end to the America we grew up in will happen.

For the last thirty years we have seen a complete lowering of standards fro public education. A battle is still taking place on the education front. As more people wake up to the fact that their children are not being taught the fact as of the truth on history, math , science, or and yes believe it or not English. I to am a victim of the lack of a sound English education. Many parents are trying to opt out and home school their children.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1720697,00.html

Here they can teach their off spring family values, a respect for their religion, and manners. However the liberal entrenched teachers union is fighting this tooth and nail. In California they have worked to discredit home schooling. The teachers union is working against vouchers, charter schools, private schools. Any thing that represents a better education and does not support propaganda.

We see an attack against the First amendment in the form of protected hate crime/speech for one group over others. No where in the Constitution does it say that a selected group will and shall have more rights and protection from other groups. Yet even as I type this we have being pushed through Congress a bill that could and will be used by the A.C.L.U., (the American communist liberation unit). This bill is aimed at speech against the Homosexual community. Providing them extra protection if they feel that they have been insulted for their life style. However this bill does not protect heterosexual people for their life style when the homosexual crowd attacks them for their opinions.

Once again we see legislation that grants certain entitlements to homosexual couples but denies the same for normal couples. (oops did I say normal? yes I did and I mean that normal versus homosexual!) Why should homosexual couples in Colorado for instance. Be allowed to after one year be granted the same privileges and benefits of a married normal couple, while a couple or heterosexual inclination who has been together for the same time be denied the same benefits of health coverage, and other insurances? This is not fair but it is happening all across this nation.

The attack on the second amendment has been under way for some time. Now the restrictions are going to be even tighter and punish the law abiding citizenry. Look at H.B. 45. This bill violates not only the second amendment but the fourth as well. What it does is say that if you own one firearm you are now In the category of a dealer because you can sell this weapon at any time. Therefore you must keep the weapon locked and ammo in another room. That authorities can enter your home and inspect to see if you are in compliance with this. An invasion of your home without warrant by the government.

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text

There is also the push to make any weapon that holds a magazine with 6 or more rounds illegal. This includes just about every auto ever made and will be interpreted to include revolvers. most revolvers have six a six round cylinder.

The government is now under the greenies and Obama, trying to dictate how we live our lives. In New York the assault is on against foods. This is backed with the latest science fiction report that over weight people are major contributors to global warming.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2387203.ece

The global warming propagandist are in full attack mode. With slickster Ken Salazar as Sec. of the Interior. We have seen a move backwards in common sense applications to business. With the reversal of certain policies put into place to ease the over regulations on environmental restrictions by the Bush administration. We see that despite the propaganda by Obama that the energy industry is going to go under. All because they can not update or build new facility's.

US Interior revokes Bush endangered species rule Reuters

White House push to nullify mining-waste rule San Francisco Chronicle

Secretary Salazar Rescinds Bush Regulations Weakening Endangered ... Center for Biological Diversity (press release)

Obama, Salazar on Renewable Energy on the Continental Shelf - peak oil Cherry Creek News

Obama/Salazar Decision on Offshore Wind Hailed as 'Biggest Federal ... PR Newswire (press release)

4/21: Ken Salazar's new energy pipe dream Face The State - Colorado

The A.C.L.U., a witch hunter group for the left, is attacking common sense. This time as they work for the left behind the scenes in Washington. Now they are taking on not only Boulder Colorado, but Colorado and the U.S. Constitution. Saying that somewhere in the Constitution there is the inalienable right to be naked in public.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/nov/07/sex-charge-worries-streaker/

This stems from a ridiculous case where some people were arrested for their participation on the great pumpkin race. This is where they strip down naked and then place pumpkins on their heads and run around Boulder. Now I am sorry if this is considered wrong, because it is. Those arrested were charge with sex crimes. The same as a flasher in the park who exposes themselves would be. It is THE SAME. However the A.C.L.U. seems to think this is OK. and that those arrested should not be charged with the possibility of having to register as a sex offender if found guilty. (well then flashers should not have to register either and then those who are caught urinating in public should not have to register either.. after all it is only fair , right?)

The left want to impose their selected values upon every one with no concern for those who oppose their standards and set the bar a little higher then the gutter. For those the left would and is working to eliminate their rights.

Now we have all heard how President Obama is working hard to help the auto industry. However in truth he has done more damage to the industry and the private sector (being the stock holders) then a bankruptcy ever could have. It also is a political payback to the unions for giving support to the left and their socialist candidates this last election.

Massive GM restructuring plan includes swap of debt into stock - Apr 28, 2009

Remember in his speech how he would create or save three million (3,000,000) jobs. Well they will not be in the auto industry that's for sure.

GM to cut 21000 US factory jobs, shed Pontiac

There are more examples , and I could go on and on about the economy and how it is suffering under the socialist agenda. Loss of jobs averaging 600,000 per month. Businesses moving out of country and taking jobs with them because of higher taxes. The GDP drops more then expected , down 6.1%. SO where are things getting better.

Look folks, socialism has failed every where in the world so why are we trying to do it here now. Yes it is time to start worrying. This is not the hope and change promised in the 2008 election campaign.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 

Advice for the Republicans in Washington

Now that the liberal American hating left has control of the House and it would appear that with Al "I am a whiner" Franken having a 60 member control of the Senate. That the liberal left and socialist will ram down through all of their socialistic big brother plans. With the Conservatives and few RINO's who see the writing on the wall. they know that they basically are sitting around collecting a check from the tax payer.

Well a little advice. In what committees that they still have a say in. They should stone wall ALL NOMINEES. Not just the liberal from the bench Judges that surely are going to be nominated, but in all subjects.

When Congress and the House are called to the floor they should all stand up and walk out on Pelosi or Reid and Bided. Do not sit there and listen to their prepared propaganda lies. They should hold press conferences at all times. As the socialist announce more of their tax and spend plans. The Republicans need to go on a massive p.r. offensive. Let the public know in detail how poor this agenda is. Give the conservative response and better plan.

At every turn they need to expose the liberals for what they are. Arlen Specter has already exposed himself for the power hungry bureaucrat that he is. That he really does not care about his constituents , only being in power. This is what Pelosi, Reid, Rockefeller, and the ilk are worried about. What they want is to remain in their positions of power over us , the citizenry.

If the Republicans want to regain some seats in both the House and the Senate they must adopt an attack attitude. They must go on the offense and be willing to wrinkle a few liberal noses.

 

Can I burn President Obama's Effigy?

I want to protest the direction and the policies of our President Obama. However how do I do that. Should I burn him in effigy? If I do so the unhinged left will want to try me for hate crimes and racism. This would send the liberals into mass hysteria I am sure.

Yet they burned Bush. They are allowed to burn, urinate, defecate on the American Flag calling it free speech. So if I use the symbol of President Barrack Hussein Obama, his effigy. Then set it on fire is it not fair to say that this is protected by free speech. That I have that right to protest and have my opinion heard under the First Amendment.

Wonder what would happen if I did this?

 

Another Obama Mistake


It has turned out to be a mistake of major order every day. That is when you look at the long term and or big picture. Is there not a move that the Obama Presidency and administration will ever take credit for or not make an excuse for? I don't think so.


When someone stands up and does the right thing. For instance the Navy following part of their mission statement. To protect American vesels on the high seas. Obama tries to take credit for it, all the while behind the scenes he was doing all he could to thwart the Navies effort. Do not forget he delayed the rescue operation by three days.


Now President Obama said Tuesday: "It was a mistake, as was stated ... and it will not happen again."


I am shocked that he did not try to blame this on former President Bush. However I did here some where that the left conspirocy and morons have tried to blame President Bush.


Here are a few more mistakes this man and his bumblers have done since taking office:


"Obama criticized pork barrel spending in the form of 'earmarks,' urging changes in the way that Congress adopts the spending proposals. Then he signed a spending bill that contains nearly 9,000 of them, some that members of his own staff shoved in last year when they were still members of Congress. 'Let there be no doubt, this piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business, and the beginning of a new era of responsibility and accountability,' Obama said." -- McClatchy, 3/11


This year's budget deficit: $1.5 trillion.


Obama taps Nancy Killefer for a new administration job, First Chief Performance Officer -- to police government spending. But it surfaces that Killefer had performance issues of her own -- a tax lien was slapped on her DC home in 2005 for failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help. She withdrew.


"For months, the Obama administration and members of Congress have known that insurance giant AIG was getting ready to pay huge bonuses while living off government bailouts. It wasn't until the money was flowing and news was trickling out to the public that official Washington rose up in anger and vowed to yank the money back." -- Associated Press, 3/18


Nixes a "buy American" provision in the stimulus bill. (now businesses are closeing up shop and moving overseas, leaving thousands unemployed)


The release of classified documents from the C.I.A., all in pursuit of political witch hunting by the Democratic party.


The placement of Giethner, Napolitano, Salazar, Clinton, just to name a few into positions of responsibility and power over this country.

 

Goodbye Specter

Goodbye, good riddance, adios, chow, don't let the door hit you on the way out!

The former RINO known as Arlen Specter has switched to a party that more supports his liberal anti American beliefs. Arlen Specter is now a Democrat giving the liberals a filibuster proof Senate. This means that we as Americans are SCREWED! Only for a little while that is.

With the courts giving Stewart Smally AKA Al "the idiot" Frankin the Minnesota Senate seat. The Democrats will now have enough votes to pass all their socialist plans without worrying about being held up by Republican votes.

Arlen Specter was doing this country no favors in his position as a RINO. What he was doing was throwing off the truth of reality. With his claim of being a Republican he was given credit as being bipartianship. In reality all he was, was a turn coat to conservatism.

This is a good thing in the big picture of the next two years. What it does is now open up definitely the candidacy for Senator in 2010 in Pennsylvania. Now the people of this state can vote a responsible person to represent them in office.

So hasta la vista Specter baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, April 27, 2009 

Janet says not to worry

Sec. of Homeland Defense Janet Napolitano says closing the border is not the answer to the current growing swine flu virus from Mexico.

"We're already doing passive surveillance at the border," Napolitano said. "You would close the border if you thought you could contain the spread of disease, but the disease is already in a number of U.S. states."

So in response I have to ask then. Just because we have a few known cases here then it is OK to let it spread? What an incompetent imbecile we have in Janet Napolitano.

Napolitano said Sunday night that there was no "realistic hope of containment" that would motivate a border closure.

I suppose then that if we had a military invasion from south of the border she would poo poo it as well. This is amazing As I said in my last blog. When we secure and close down the border only allowing entry through controlled ports. We can then screen for such health issues as this swine flu.

When asked about the asymptomatic flu carriers who could enter the country, Napolitano stressed the need for personal responsibility in preventing the spread of the disease. S I suppose that the security of this nation is a personal responsibility too? Is this person for real?

Talk about being out of touch with responsibility and the real world. Janet Napolitano's job is to try and prevent this sort of thing. Her passing the buck off to personal responsibility just demonstrates that Obama has worthless, incompetent fools working for him.

Napolitano has got to go. She is no longer just a joke in office. She poses a real threat to this country.

 

Epidemic can be prevented some what

Why the left and so called Democratic leaders want to play politics with the out break of this Mexican Swine Flu. We can prevent some of it, or at least isolate it to a degree.

Democratic leaders are reaching far on this one. Blaming Republicans for the recent outbreak of flu. Their claim to hysteria is that the Republicans refused to let some $900 million worth of spending in to the economic porkulus bill. The fact preparations has nothing to do with the economy is irrelevant. What matters is the FACT that this virus originated in Mexico. That all cases reported around the world have originated in Mexico, and that many nations are now testing all incoming from this region of the world.

Yet Janet Napolitano originally said that there was no need for testing of passengers from Mexican flights. Or the fact that Obama has yet to fill the Surgeon General position and the administration staff there in. An empty 19 seats for people who's job it is to lead during a situation like this.

Mean while Russia is banning all beef exported from the United States to their country as well as checking all flights and passengers for the virus from here. The European Union has put a warning on travel to the United States. Telling vacationers and business personal to avoid all travel to Mexico and The United States. Some faith there huh?

The World Health Organization said there were 40 confirmed cases in the U.S. but no deaths. Yet the numbers are on the rise. With over 108 confirmed deaths so far in Mexico the number here is surely to increase. Why?

With an open border and ,many seeking medical attention in the United States. We see a whole lot of sick people with Tuberculosis, Chicken Pox, and Leprosy come across the southern border . These people so far have not sought to cause problems, (yet they do), but rather they are seeking medical attention from a system that is the best in the world. Not to mention free to non citizens.

Myself and many others for years have warned that just such a situation may develop. Now we have one. We may not be able to stop the out break of this virus, but we can slow the spread of it down.

We have in place a screening system for those who wish to enter this country. It is a medical screening. It identifies possible health threats that we may face. This is why the border cannot be left wide open. People enter through the LEGAL ports and are screened. If they have a contagion, then it is identified and isolated.

Is this so hard to understand? It is if you are a bleeding heart progressive thinking liberal. The fact that it may be inconvenient to have a medical examination to enter this country is not a violation of human rights. As a matter of fact it more then likely would save some poor souls life by getting them the medical attention that they need sooner rather then later. We have to control the borders of this country not just from would be terrorist. We have to secure them for medical and societal reasons as well.

Do not let idiots like House Appropriations Committee chairman David Obey, play the blame game on this. There is enough blame to go around politically and with those in Washington. When yours and my safety and health are at risk because some lunkhead in Washington D.C. wants to play politics over certain issues. Issues like border security, filling vacant government positions with incompetent fools. Then it is high time you and I get more active in whats at stake.

story links here:

40 CASES IN UNITED STATES...

EU: Don't travel to USA and Mexico...

**Russia to check all planes from Americas...

JANET: NO TESTING OF INCOMING PLANE PASSENGERS...

Every passenger arriving in Britain from Mexico screened...

UK INVESTIGATING 17 POSSIBLE CASES...

Friday, April 24, 2009 

What I am looking for in a candidate

I do not advocate a third party but am distinctly disgusted with the Republicans and after the abysmal failure to produce a credible candidate last November. I left the Republican party and became an Independent. Now with the outlook for someone to get into federal office. Someone who is not a yes man like Udall, or an appointed yes vote for the liberal socialist left like Bennett. I figure maybe I should list some of the issues and hopeful stance that the candidate I will support should have.

The Economy: get government out of the private sector and out of businesses. Reduce the extra red tape and let the free market correct itself. (I have faith in the average person) My candidate should have faith in the American people as well.

Taxes: lower taxes and push for a flat tax rate. This way there is to be no lop holes for the liberal rich left to cry about and use for themselves. Lower business taxes so that companies will bring manufacturing back into this country and not take it overseas or to Mexico. Raise the tariff on countries that do not want to play ball. This means reducing foreign aid as well to them.

Push for investigations into the insurance companies and the kick backs into congress. It is the insurance companies that have the health care system messed up. Remove any notion of a national health care scam. The services provided in this country are the best in the world.

Immigration: enforce the LAWS!!!!!!!!!! No amnesty for anyone from any country. Secure the borders both north and south. This means taking an active part in the enforcement of law in Mexico as well as America when it comes to our border and Citizens.

International Piracy: No quarter given. Provide security in the form of Navy escort of some kind. No negotiating with pirates, they are terrorist of the seas. Sink them and their ships when found.

Global Climate Control: Someone who listens to the real science and not the politically correct Propaganda that is being spewed. Removal of the United States from all treaties that punish and fine this nation for violations of other countries. Management of the environment is the key not bowing to it.

Judicial Appointees: someone who will back the confirmation of judges who do not legislate from the bench and do not interpret and listen to foreign law over the Constitution.

Energy: someone who will use a little common sense and allow some drilling , while at the same time institute Nuclear, Wind, Solar, and other alternative energy strategies that will keep us from being dependant on fossil fuels from other unfriendly Nations.

The Military: Someone who understands how the military is works and should be used. Someone who will not cry foul every time the military fires a bullet at an enemy and then calls for a congressional investigation to determine if it was a human rights violation because we are at war and the soldier was protecting himself from being killed.

Foreign Policy: A person who understand that the use of force is a last measure but that does not mean it should never be used. Someone who understands how the term "walk softly but carry a big stick" should be implemented.

Further more I want a Senator that has no connections to Chicago politics at all.

Hell Maybe I should run?

 

Think about it

I weep for the liberty of my country when I see at this early day of its successful experiment that corruption has been imputed to many members of the House of Representatives, and the rights of the people have been bartered for promises of office.

The duty of government is to leave commerce to its own capital and credit as well as all other branches of business, protecting all in their legal pursuits, granting exclusive privileges to none.

The planter, the farmer, the mechanic, and the laborer... form the great body of the people of the United States, they are the bone and sinew of the country men who love liberty and desire nothing but equal rights and equal laws.

The people are the government, administering it by their agents; they are the government, the sovereign power.


A few wise words from a man who would not be bullied or coerced. Old Hickory himself Andrew Jackson

Thursday, April 23, 2009 

Salem Witch Trials

Here we go. I said this last year when it looked like all the mush heads were going to vote with their propagandised brainwashed grey matter. Now I was right. The far flung from reality and anti American crowd, pretending to run the show in Washington are on the hunt. We are going to see investigation after investigation of alleged crimes that are being politically pursued and not reasoned out.

The left will not be satisfied until they are able to pin some imagined wrong on former President Bush and ram through a false conviction of feel good leftist views. This is bad precedent big time. Not only are they twisting and spinning arguments they are purposely hiding and ignoring any involvement that they them selves may have had in these sham investigations coming down the pike.

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, promised an end to the culture of corruption. However as each hour goes by we find more and more corruption that she herself is tied into. Not to mention the lack of law and the Constitution that the left is abusing and ignoring at whim.

This fake human right/torture commission is only the beginning of the political drama that the left will parade in front of the world. Trying to embarrass and exploit this country to their own ends. A very, very, very bad mistake.

Despite the propaganda of the press and its biased support for a corrupt and incompetent Administration. The fat remains that this messiah is loosing popularity rather rapidly and it is not coming back. As Americans wake up to the real fascist in Washington and the shredding of the Constitution and arrogance being displayed. They, the public is getting tired and in some corners scared of the leftist theft of this country.

Is it a Greek tragedy? Is it a Shakespearean comedy of errors? This play being put on for the world show is definitely an attention getter and will not have a happy ending. Let us just hope that the ending will not turn out to be a real tragedy for the American citizen and freedom loving people.

Sow not what you reap, for you may reap not what you sow

 

Loose Weight, it will save the planet

We were warned that it would come. We saw it first with the hit jobs against fast food places. Then we saw it enter the school system. Then it came right at us full force in the face. It did not work well. Many balked at the intrusion into our lives. So now they take yet another approach and this time they will force it upon us.

What am I talking about? The anti Barbie doll crowd wants to impose their view of how we live and what we look like on us. This time it is with the green approach. You have to do it in order to save the planet. Become a goose stepping minon to the global warming mongers. You have to after all it is because you are over weight the planet is dying.

You consume more food, this means that more land is used in production of food. You drive more then others , thus you use more fossil fuel then others. You labor when you breath, thus you personally contribute more Co2 to the atmosphere then others. Lets face it it is you that is killing the planet.

Plus look at the bonus of loosing weight. you look better, there are less medical problems in your life. This helps out the medical profession and the push for nationalising health care. Just think Government will soon make you loose weight. After all it is their agenda to run your life because you have been irresponsible with it to start with.

Remember the Big Brother Obama Green movement knows what is best and you don't!

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 

The Lefts Bill of Rights

(what the amendment is in blue, and what the left want in red)

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress shall make law that disrespects any Christian or Judeo religion that insults Islam, prohibit the free exercise of and impede freedom of speech, support propaganda press, and limit the assembly of people who disagree with policies set forth by the government.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The people shall not be allowed the right to bear arms or secure the nation in a militia unless the weapons are provided to and supervised by a homeland security force of , by , and for the government.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Homeland security forces and United Nations militia shall be housed in the homes of known anti socialist homes without dissent at any time.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The right of the government to secure persons, houses, papers, and effects may be searched and seized without warrant if deemed to be subversive to the Nation.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Any person of a non progressive thought shall be held to answer capital, or infamous crime. If refusing to answer for alleged crimes they shall be harassed and forced publicly to admit with or with out trial for hate language and hate crimes. Private property of said people will be seized with out compensation and used for the betterment of the public good.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

In criminal and political prosecutions, the accused shall be represented by a government appointed legal aid in the world court. The right to have their side of the accusation petitioned by motion of a world jury. The right to hear charges filed in the world court at some point in the trial.

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

In suits of political correctness, where the value in controversy lies between $1.00 and $1,000,000.00, an automatic fine will be imposed to save the planet from global warming, not to exceed the $1,000,000.00 limit per accusation. All rulings are to be final and no appeal.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Excessive bail shall be required in all cases in which the environment and hate speech are defined as the primary charge.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The rights of the Constitution, shall only be applied when a judicial appointee deems them to apply to the people, and be appropriate towards the politically correct ends.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The powers of the individual State are to be superseded by that of the Federal Government at all times. If a conflict of interest accures, the Federal Government shall always be given the right of authority.

There you have it. The lefts new vision of the Bill of Rights. The new first ten amendments to the Constitution.

 

At what cost , the persecution of the Bush administration

The left wing fanatics are hell bent on putting President Bush and his administration in jail for ideological reasons. The real questions here is the president that they are trying to set. If they succeed in their unwarranted false persecution who else needs to go down then under these pretenses?

Seeing how Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Tom Daschale, just about everyone in Congress and the Senate had knowledge of what was going on . Should they not also be prosecuted as accessories as well? Instead of looking into their complacency, the pursuit of conservatives and Republicans only is what is happening.

This is nothing more then a cheap Venezuelan attempt to purge the government of any opposition to the lefts agenda. Seeing how the American voter was conned and lied to in order to vote for these socialist. We won't even begin to try and talk about the voter fraud that the courts are supporting from ACORN.

Back to topic.

If the courts here the made up false case of torture and other "high crimes" against the Bush administration then they have to take in charges against the Democrats in office as well. Including President Obama and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton as well. These two are not innocent of the same charges claimed against Bush.

Rush Limbaugh said it best. When he said that these liberals and socialist are in for hell he is right. The 2010 election is not that far away and we are already seeing a major buyers remorse out of the Obama supporters and Democratic party. Should the left push any harder on their lies and fraudulent accusations. They need to fear the whirl wind come 2011.

With the rules and Chicago way of doing things, the expectation of receiving a fair treatment of their crimes is false. A full investigation and prosecution if their real crimes will come down upon their heads like a cartoon anvil from above.

What we as responsible American Citizens must pay attention to, is the way the left and these socialist are twisting and spinning reality in order to achieve their agenda. We have many long years ahead in which we have tom work hard to undo the damage that is now being done by these clowns. A start will be to vote them out of office A.S.A.P. Then take the same action, but use the truth of their crimes and punish them as the situationist and criminals that they are.

We will not have to invent false charges and made up crimes. The lefts actions of today are breaking the laws now.

Pay attention how the left is spinning and hiding the truth of the so called crimes. The refusal to listen to the other side and the refusal to allow the full story out.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 

The Continual Flaunting of the Law

ENTRY WITHOUT INSPECTION IS A CRIME:

Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1325, crossing the border illegally is a crime–a misdemeanor for the first offense and a felony for the second and subsequent offenses.

SO what does our ever vigilant Sec. of Homeland Defense think of the law?

"because crossing the border is not a crime per se. It is civil. " or so interprets Janet "enforcing what law" Napolitano.

If you take the time to read the law you see that no where is it a civil offense but a criminal offense. A huge difference in punishment and enforcement. However the open border anti American sovereignty crowd wants to blur this line even further than it already is.

This is the ignorance we have in office and positions of authority and governance. Absolute incompetence, and complete disregard for the law of this country.

These people in power are the same ones who think that identity theft is a victimless crime as well. That is until they get their identity stolen then it is a capitol offense.

They do not agree with the law so now they do not want to enforce the laws. It is inconceivable that they would ever be allowed to hold office yet they do. So how does this effect this country? It is destroying this country that is what it is doing.

To bring some sort of order to the chaos that our socialist government is now creating. One must think like they do. If we do not agree that murder is a crime we should be allowed to commit murder anytime we feel like it, or rob a bank, steal a car etc. It fits their logic. If you do not agree then do not accept the law the way it is.

Janet Napolitano needs to be removed from office and have her treasonous feet held to the fire. Her policy enforcement and that of the Obama administration is a joke.

There is a web site that is pusdhing for the removal of this ignorant woman from office. here is the link:

http://firenapolitano.com/

check it out

Monday, April 20, 2009 

The Economy, The White House, and the LIES! AAAAAAAARRRRRGH

Sitting here listening to Neil Cavuto on FOX news I am livid. I am fed up with out right lies and spin that comes form those who think the American tax payer is stupid.

I am calling the White House and its lieing staff out. This bogus B.S. of you are getting a tax cut if you make less then $250,000.00 a year. If you make less then this you receive a tax credit not a cut. I concede that point. However the FACT that cost of living taxes are going up on every thing else does not change the fact that taxes are increasing.

Do they think that just because we receive an extra $13 dollars a week that is not taxed yet but when we do our taxes next year the tax tables will not have changed. That the extra 676 dollars we get will put the majority in a higher tax bracket is something we do not see? Are they the ones who are really stupid?

HELL YES THEY ARE!

If taxes ( being called an increase in fees) goes up on energy consumption, phone bills, the Internet for crying out loud. These are taxes and going up is an increase. Do they not understand this on the left or are they so greedy that they think the average American will never notice this?

I say each and every one of the spin doctors that come on television and lie about this needs to be called to the carpet on it. I say if they want to stifle our voice we sing louder and stronger. Shout down this tyranny that the left is creating. They are no better then the thieves calling themselves pirates in Somalia.

Quit trying to deceive the people with the spin of "you are getting a tax cut". Call it what it is a TAX CREDIT at best. Do not lie about the increases in cost of living.

On top of it all for GOD's sake, stop saying you inherited this when Obama and his cronies are the ones who have doubled and tripled the deficit.

Sunday, April 19, 2009 

Obama Lets the World Dog The United States

Once again we see our ever fearless passive leader go forth and let the world insult and lie about the United States of America. This time it is not kowtowing to the left of Europe but to the vile oppresive dictators in Latin and South America.

His first stop was to listen to the lies and spread them himself about the U.S. border with Mexico. The corrupt government of Mexico listed and twisted the facts about the danger spilling across the border from their lack of being able to handle the drug cartels. The fact that it is the Mexican governments corrupt military supplying a vast arsenal of American made weapons to thugs, thieves and degenerates. Obama and Hillary go along and recite the same lies.

Next stop is the Caribbean where the Latin summit occurred. Here we have some of the worlds worst perpetrators of human rights violations spew forth their contempt for democracy and freedom. Calling the United States a terrorist state. What does our ever vigilant and edjumacated ivy league President do? Nothing. He sits there and lets a man like Daniel Ortega denounce the United States.

Calling us terrorist and imperialist.Why, because we helped throw his corrupt backside out of power in the 80's. This is why. This man if his country had any brains would have executed him.
Nope, they end up releasing him from prison then voting him back into office. Idiots!!!!!

Next we begin talks with Fidel Castro and Cuba. For over 50 years we have boycotted this oppressive regime. There is good reason too. Fidel is corrupt, oppressive, and has tried to put nuclear weapons in our back yard. Sounds like a good reason to me to isolate him. We could have blown that tiny island off the map but for the sake of the Cuban people we did not.

Noe Hugo Chavez down in Venezuela is building air bases, military outposts, and weapons factories. He is also aiding and supplying terrorist and drug cartels with weapons and military advisers in their battle to overthrow Democratic Governments, Columbia and Brazil. As well as simply adding instabbility to Latin and South America with Leftist indoctrination, and class warfare.

Why does not President Obama say something about the truth oif the matter. He does not, is it because he is so out of touch with reality that he believes this garbage that these dictators are saying? More probable then not.

Lets face it he definaetly is not the sharpest tool in the shed. He says our economy is now getting better do to his stimulus. In fact more Americans are now out of work then in the last 25 years.
President Obama has not just lost this country respect in the standings of the world, but with the majority of the American public. He may be a personable man, and his likability is in the 60% range. However check the numbers when it comoes to respect for the office. More people feel he has no back bone, leadership in a crisis, or a clue on how to be a President.

By him allowing this country to be bad mouthed without a reply from him or the State department, demonstrates he either agrees. Or that he is indeed clueless.

Thursday, April 16, 2009 

An Historical comparison to the 1773 and 2009 Tea Parties

As the left and their propagandist public relations wing (the media), poo poo April 15Th 2009 and how it is just radicals and extremist, or an anti Obama movement sponsoring the events. First we must recognise that the count is still increasing and that the amazing numbers being turned in by the "little" Tax Tea Parties is where the movement is the strongest.

Unofficially we are hearing that over 250,000 nation wide attended these protests and the numbers are still growing. The nay sayers claim that this is nothing as we had over 100,000 in the streets of L.A. in favor of amnesty. A little reminder on that. The majority them selves were illegal and many came from all over the country to attend in one area. I am sure if there was a call for just one Tea march in one city it would get 100,000 people to attend from all over the country as well. Another fact is maybe companies would let their employees off work for this one as they did for the amnesty march.

The myth, rumors, miss information that is being spread as to why people protested is really astonishing. A direct look back wards in our own history would give a better explanation as to why Americans came out in the numbers that they did.

First to those who think that the numbers were to small for the Tax Day Tea Party of 2009 are to small to matter. Let us not forget that only 7000 people were hanging around the Boston docks when as little as 200 men dressed as Native Americans ( that is Indians for the non politically correct). Climbed aboard three different ships and dumped teas belonging to the East India Trading company into the harbour. Thus the beginning of the revolution (metaphorically).

The Boston event was what could be considered the final straw. The one that broke the camels back. Actual resentment of taxation goes back a bit further then 1773. A continual lack of representation in the English Parliament, ( lack of representation? sound familiar) for the colonies set with an increase in fees and tariffs (again sound familiar?). Lead to a high level of frustration by the colonials who found that these fees were way to high and unable in many cases pay for.

Three key acts are pointed out in history as fuel for the fire of the revolution. The Stamp Act in 1765, the Townsend Acts in 1767, and finally the Tea tax in 1773.

The Townshend Acts were British legislation intended to raise revenue, tighten customs enforcement, and assert imperial authority in America. They were sponsored by Chancellor of the Exchequer Charles Townshend, hence the name, enacted on June 29, 1767. The key statute levied import duties on glass, lead, paint, paper, and tea. Its purpose was to provide salaries for some colonial officials so that the provincial assemblies could not coerce them by withholding wages. A tax but not on wages. Sounds like a fee hike that we see today does it not. Hikes in Electric consumption, natural gas usage. Charges for the use of your cell phone when calling emergency numbers (the 9-1-1 fee).

The Townsend Acts run parallel to what the stimulus package of 2009 and the Obama budget creates. No increase in the wages of certain people, yet in the overall picture and increase in the loss of net income do to an increase in hidden taxes (fees). To put it bluntly, it is a tax increase just not in my and your wages. We are going to and are paying more in taxes. Not only on the local, and state levels where the biggest increases are happening, but on the federal level as well.

The Stamp act, which took effect earlier, in the year 1765. Was a tax imposed on legal and commercial documents as well as printed material such as newspapers and pamphlets, all of which had to carry a special stamp. Without this stamp the documents were not recognised. This again is not a wage tax but affects the net income of the taxpayer. Forcing them to pay an additional tax on something that they need. Yet it did not affect their paychecks per say.

These acts of a government, the British Parliament, were imposed upon citizens in the colonies with out any representation given for the colonist.

So how does the lack of representation here compare to what is happening today? In today's environment we have a lack in leadership, responsibility and job description by our elected officials. The argument of no representation can be argued. Officials in Washington have been duly elected in most cases. Voter fraud and appointments not withstanding.

We have officials in Washington who are going through the motions of office and not fully exercising their true responsibility. The prime example, a lack of reading the stimulus package by their own admission. What kind of leadership is this?

In the 1760's and 70's people had the feeling of no say in what the government was doing. On the fees and increases being placed upon their income and restrictions upon their ability to improve their living standard.

Today we see the growing resentment in the very same feelings that lead to the American Revolution over two hundred years ago. The lack of say in fee hikes, rising prices in commodities do to taxes placed upon consumption products (gas, energy,transportation of goods, etc.). Thus a lack in or of representation.

Yes we can say that there is a definite feeling of buyers remorse from the election cycle in 2008. The people are not happy with the direction of the change promised and the fading hope that is coming with it.

 

Is there a connection?


Could there be some truth to the rumor of Obama goose steppers coming soon to control the populace. A civilian defense that is a s well armed and trained as the military. A new version of Hitlers brown shirts enforcing political correctness in the streets, schools , and homes of the American citizen.


The recent report from the DHS that says military veterans, those American citizens who call for law enforcement, and even the Catholic Church because they oppose abortion. All named as right wing radicals. In other words those who think of the big picture while protecting their personal freedoms and rights are to be considered extremists.


Lets throw in a few more dots to connect here and it does look plausible. The push for more mental health care for those who served. A good thing , but wait it comes with the legal marker that would prevent non active military personnel from purchasing fire arms do to the fact this mental health care will categorise these vets having mental problems when they don't. A disqualified for the legal purchase of fire arms.


Next the dots of the recent Tax Tea Party attenders. Labeled by our ever fair and more then balanced MSM who says that all who attended are anti government, anti Obama wackos.


Today's trip to our southern friend Mexico by the open border supporting administration. The acceptance of Mexico's spin that now all the border violence is all America's fault because we are all drug addicts. That there is no real threat from Mexico. Remember that quote. No real threat. Despite the fact that just this week anti aircraft guns were taken from the Cartels.


So if we take these dots and line them up. We can arrange them into a fashion in which it would look like the lies about the border are a setup. That the push to make conservatives into the enemy of this country and the removal of the second amendment rights of veterans lead to a creation of goose stepping political correct police that will abolish the last remnants of the constitution.



Maybe , maybe not. Just something to think about as Janet Napolitano now backtracks as fast as she can from her support of the DHS report that did label conservatives as right wing extremists.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009 

More pics of Denver and the Tea party
















 

More Signs from Denver











Plenty of more signs, more support for responsible government. Basicly two thousand Coloradoians who are not pleased with Obama and his cronies in Washington D.C.




 

Denver's Tea Party












A good showing and turn out on the West steps of the State Capital in Denver Colorado today.

Looks like maybe two thousand showed up.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 

The Enemy is within the gates


This is amazing. Not only is it crazy but absurd, ludicrous, stupid, and dangerous. Not only does this woman have no background to be appointed to this position, her stance on defense issues are very anti American military. What am I talking about? The appointment of Rosa Brooks to a high level position as an advisor to the defense department.


Who is Rosa Brooks? Rosa Brooks is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times and a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she specializes in international law. She also serves as Director of Georgetown Law's Human Rights Institute.

She has also served as a senior advisor at the US Department of State’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, a consultant for the Open Society Institute and Human Rights Watch, a fellow at the Carr Center at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, a board member of Amnesty International USA, a Term Member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a lecturer at Yale Law School, and a member of the Executive Council of the American Society of International Law. All of which are left leaning organizations that so not support or think highly of the United States and its Military.

Her left wing associations continue. She currently serves on the board of the National Security Network, serves on the steering committee of the White Oak Foreign Policy Leaders' Project, the steering committee of the Connect US Fund's Project on Foreign Policy Priorities for the Next President, and on the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Council on Fragile States.

All these groups and organizations have a one track mind. The elimination of Capitalism and America.

Am I being an alarmist? HELL YEAH! This woman will be given access to top secrete plans, numbers, information that the left (certain Socialist, Islamic and Communist states ) would love to get their hands on.

As one who believes that international law supersedes the American Constitution. Is there any concern out of Washington that she may just spill the beans and work against what out our nation was founded on?

Here we have a person who thinks the rights of the pirates are more important then those who they take hostage and steal from. This is a person who thinks that terrorist have special civil rights. Rights that are no where to be found in the Geneva convention, or the rules of war. She would rather prosecute those who defend this nation instead of going after those who would willingly kill American women and children.
What in the hell is going on in Washington. We have tax cheats being put in charge of the economy, and now those who hate the military in positions of authority over the military. The inmates are running the asylum, and the enemy is within the gates.

 

Remember this face


Remember this face!


Is it the face of tyranny and oppression? Or is it the face of a misguided fool. One who despite the position in government has not a clue as to what is truly a threat to this nation and its people, or is this person really working as hard as she can to subvert and destroy this nation.


Promoting an agenda that censors and lies about those who believe in the true meaning of freedom and the documents that we hold dear.

Janet Napolitano is the Sec. of Homeland Defense. In her current position she is charged with the protection of this nation on the home front and its borders. Yet she favors open border policy, publishes reports that hold no statistical data or truth only conjecture against those who do not follow her belief in amnesty.

The recently released report on right wing "extremists" is just more propaganda that is misleading and wrong.

 

New Link

I would like to welcome and thank both at the same time all readers and the bloggers over at "This Ain't Hell, but you can see it from here" to The Tree of Liberty.

My apologises for not having read this blog before. To those who follow this blog please go over and check them out if you have not read there before.

 

Is the White House paranoid?


Is President Obama and his minions in office paranoid, or just doing their best to stigmatise anyone who would politically and ideologically oppose them.


The current 9 page DHS report has absolutely no specifics but innuendo on those who may be conservative in thought and fiscal responsibility. It specifically states a fear of those who past and presently serve in the military.


"Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists," it says. "DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities."


To even suggest that honored members of the military would stage, invite, or plan an all out military coup of the government is insulting and shows their disdain and disrespect for those who wear and have worn the uniform. The fact that many who are out of service still hold the oath taken to "defend the Constitution from both enemies domestic and foreign". While those still on active service take this oath very serious.


Although if one were to crunch numbers and play odds there may be one in a couple of thousand who harbours the thought of removing Obama from office with force. It does not mean that all members are this way. In fact the conclusion after calling many who wear the uniform and talking to them about their feelings. They seem to want to be more active politically and will exercises their right to vote.


It would seem that with each new day under the left leaning power hungry administration, we are inundated with more and more reports that show a tendency to a mass paranoia out of Washington. A false sense that they are in jeopardy of being violently removed from office.


Is their own guilty feelings of being part of a culture of corruption getting to them? Are they so afraid that their lack of leadership and backroom dealings will lead to the truth of their corruption being found out by the masses that they are trying to deceive?


For those who love the Constitution and their freedoms and rights granted under the Bill of Rights. You need to pay attention to the bunk that these jokers are trying to push.

 

DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS

Three cheers and a hallelujah for the Great State of Texas. At least there is some hope out there for the Constitution of the United States of America.

From the Drudge report:

AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of states’ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“I believe that our federal government has become oppressive in its size, its intrusion into the lives of our citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state,” Gov. Perry said. “That is why I am here today to express my unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I believe that returning to the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution and its essential 10th Amendment will free our state from undue regulations, and ultimately strengthen our Union.”

Perry continued: "Millions of Texans are tired of Washington, DC trying to come down here to tell us how to run Texas."

[VIDEO] (not linked here)

A number of recent federal proposals are not within the scope of the federal government’s constitutionally designated powers and impede the states’ right to govern themselves. HCR 50 affirms that Texas claims sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not otherwise granted to the federal government.

It also designates that all compulsory federal legislation that requires states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties, or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed.

Just what does the Tenth amendment say?

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So what does this mean?

''The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.''

1 ''The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.''

2 That this provision was not conceived to be a yardstick for measuring the powers granted to the Federal Government or reserved to the States was firmly settled by the refusal of both Houses of Congress to insert the word ''expressly'' before the word ''delegated,''

3 and was confirmed by Madison's remarks in the course of the debate which took place while the proposed amendment was pending concerning Hamilton's plan to establish a national bank. ''Interference with the power of the States was no constitutional criterion of the power of Congress. If the power was not given, Congress could not exercise it; if given, they might exercise it, although it should interfere with the laws, or even the Constitutions of the States.''

4 Nevertheless, for approximately a century, from the death of Marshall until 1937, the Tenth Amendment was frequently invoked to curtail powers expressly granted to Congress, notably the powers to regulate commerce, to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, and to lay and collect taxes.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, 5 Marshall rejected the proffer of a Tenth Amendment objection and offered instead an expansive interpretation of the necessary and proper clause 6 to counter the argument. The counsel for the State of Maryland cited fears of opponents of ratification of the Constitution about the possible swallowing up of states' rights and referred to the Tenth Amendment to allay these apprehensions, all in support of his claim that the power to create corporations was reserved by that Amendment to the States.

7 Stressing the fact that the Amendment, unlike the cognate section of the Articles of Confederation, omitted the word ''expressly'' as a qualification of granted powers, Marshall declared that its effect was to leave the question ''whether the particular power which may become the subject of contest has been delegated to the one government, or prohibited to the other, to depend upon a fair construction of the whole instrument.''

(found reference at : http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment10/01.html#2 )

(Numbers indicate case law, footnotes located at above web address.)

Now if only Colorado's Governor Ritter had the knowledge to stand up for the State and not fall into goose step with the power grab coming from Washington D.C.

 

Another dropping poll for Obama


In an addition to Robert Shrum and his reading of poll results., Here is the latest Rasmussen. Obama has only a +2 rating. Yet Shrum claims that Obama has hiogh favorable poll results. HMMMM notin this one. A +2 does not seem very high to me.

 

Robert Shrum: does he smoke something illegal?

Have you read the latest garbage from Robert Shrum? Well first who is this guy and why is what he says nothing more than spin from the left hiding the truth of what is happening.

Robert Shrum, in order to know where he stand we must know where he sits ( a very wise saying from Mike Rosen on KOA 850 Denver). ROBERT M. SHRUM has been a senior adviser to the Gore 2000 presidential campaign. The chief strategist for the 2004 Kerry-Edwards campaign, he is currently a Senior Fellow at New York University's Wagner School of Public Service.

So now we know that he is clearly a left winger and his agenda is tilted to one side of the spectrum.

Lets look at some of the rather insulting wrongful conclusions he makes in his column:

The pettiness plays out on every conceivable stage—from the do-nothing, denounce-everything Republican minority in Congress, to the do-anything Republican attempt to overturn the Senate election in Minnesota, and the say-anything attacks of right-wing talk radio. Democrats, who had every reason to be bitter after the 2000 election, actually gave Bush a job approval rating almost ten points higher than the one Republicans now begrudge Obama—and they did so during the floundering, pre-9/11 muddle of the Bush Presidency.

The pettiness, it was not pettiness when the democratic party was out of favor in Washington and sat in contempt of their jobs by blocking and filler busting anything that the Republican party put forth.

The do nothing attempt to get to the bottom of obvious voter fraud and rigged election in Minnesota. Shrum neglects to mention all the major transgressions that were perpetrated by the democrats in fraudulent vote counting, for instance. In certain precincts they had more votes then voters.

Next the one thing all the left loves to attack. Talk Radio. Why because to borrow a Jack Nicholson line, THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH, so they spin and twist, then lie about what is said, especially when it exposes their corruption. Remember Nancy Pelosi Robert. She promised to end the culture of corruption, oh wait that was only if it was with people who disagreed with her. Meaning she ignores the real corruption in her own back yard and party.

Then the old tired line of Bush lied people died. Pre 9/11 blame game. Robert face the truth . There is enough blame to go around , so do not start to point fingers on this as more then a fair share go back to the democrats, your candidate Al, and his buddy Bill.

Shrum has this to say about President Obama :

a President who pursues sweeping economic change while conquering hearts and minds overseas and coolly dispatching the shoot-to-kill order that freed an American ship captain from Somali Pirates.

One can not argue the sweeping economic change . It is a change that when it comes to fruition we will be devastated with debt. However to spin ans say coolly dispatching the shoot to kill order. This is the spin and lie of the week. The Navy is already charged with protecting the lives of American Maritime personnel. What Obama did was to restrict and hinder the Navy in freeing Capt. Phillips sooner. Obama showed no leadership and now tries to take credit for something he almost screwed up.

Shrums article goes on to talk about Newt Gingrich , the sour soul in the Republican party. How more Republicans are identifying themselves as independent and leaning to the Democrats for companionship. He calls for more moderation in the conservative movement.

He neglects to mention that in reality more and more Democrats are questioning and going against the Obama administration and its agenda then being supported by RINO's. He neglects the fact that the RINO's are now being rooted out and held accountable. In other words his column is nothing more then liberal propaganda given credit as being gospel. Where as it is nothing new but more regurgitated lies and spin from the left in more attempts to brainwash the uninformed.

Monday, April 13, 2009 

Forgive the Pirates, they were teenagers

Just what does this mean?

Sec. of Defense Robert gates said, confirmed by a Pentagon spokesman, "The Somali pirates who took a US merchant captain hostage for five days were heavily armed but inexperienced youths." adding that they were only aged 17 to 19 years old.

So what? Who cares. These youths tried to seize a ship under the flag of another nation. It was an act of piracy! A CRIME people, not a Sunday joyride in daddies car. These youths took automatic weapons and RPG launchers, tried to hold others hostage for ransom, and they are doing it still.

Is Sec. Gates suggesting that we should feel guilty and ashamed that they were not trained as well as the U.S. Navy SEALS? What is going on here? Why the outpouring concern for criminals and terrorists.

Should we go in and train these thugs so that they can better execute their crimes in a more efficient manner. Is this what they are saying? When will these liberal progressive thinkers realise that they are out of touch with reality. That criminals are criminals and their actions should not be rewarded.

That just because they may be teenagers the act of piracy is still an act of piracy and best not be taken lightly.

When are we going to get some back bone in the government and do what is right, not what is popular. To be frank and brutally honest. These pirates, like the terrorist need to be isolated and killed. No mercy. No reeducation crap. These people will not show mercy to their victems. So why do we have to play by these false rules that only the United States is held accountable for.

Leftists, progressives, and liberals all retort that if we don't play fair, and take a hard line we lower ourselves to their level and invite more violance.

News Flash people. It is past time to make a stand. By going down this path of capitulation we are inviting more and more acts against us.

Put simply, there comes a time and place when you have to stand up to the school yard bully. you can run to the teachers all you want. However when you are the teacher and have no one to run to what do you do? Take a stand and when push comes to shove be more then ready to not only shove back but get in to the mud and fight.

Bullies do not understand a time out, or a talking to. They do however understand a black eye and a bloody nose.

If here in America a teenager takes a gun and robs a liquor store. Chances are he will be tried as an adult and face prison time. If he pulls a gun on a police officer he runs the risk of being shot. This goes for the pirates. They pull a gun an try to take property in international waters that does not belong to them then they need to beware.

Do not try and make me feel guilty about the conditions in Somali as a justification for 17 to 19 year old being excused for committing crimes. Do not play the race card or the fat American living off the backs of others either!

 

Sexting, yes, no?

This is news? The fact that little Johnny has done something that his parents should have taught him better of?
.
It is sad that little Johnny did something that as a society we have deemed socially immoral and now Johnny has to pay the price and register as a sex offender. Oh shucks my heart aches, (NOT).

Just because Johnny evidently has parents who did not take the time to sit down and discuss such behavior with him. We as a society must feel guilty for Johnny. I say BULL $%^#.

So what is sexting? Well if you have not heard it is where teenagers take pictures of themselves and send it via text, over the phone/Internet in nothing but their birthday suits. For those who do not know , that means naked pictures of themselves.

So is this a crime guilty of punishment of being a registered sex offender? Hmmmm, technically it is child pornography, and that is a punishable offense. So if a child, or minor, (that is all who are under the legal age, which is 16 for consent in most jurisdictions) commites an act that violates law we need to go easy on them.

There once was a time, oh so long ago where we held the parents of these children responsible for the behavior of that child. Now it seems that no one is responsible and if the child does something wrong they get a pass. This is yet an other example of progressive thinking and its failures.

When we entitle youth to rights that they are not ready for they do stupid things. It is human nature to screw up. Yet with each screw up there comes responsibility and consequences. If a child assaults another child it is assault period. Does that mean that we lock the child up forever? No, it means though that if it was out of anger or for viciousness then punishment needs to fit the act.

Should a child be a sex offender for sexting? Well it is child porn. It does demonstrate a lack of any moral judgement and decision making. It demonstrates that some parents who think it is OK do not have any moral values themselves.

If the child is a chronic sexter then there is a major problem and being labeled a sex offender might be the right punishment. After all if you are ticketed for urinating in public you can also be punished as having to register yourself as a sex offender.

Maybe a removal of cell phones from the hands of the youth is an option, but heaven forbid if we stigmatise the child for doing something wrong. that would only make the child think about their acts and the consequences. This we know is never the right thing to do. Teach the children right from wrong.

Sunday, April 12, 2009 

White House denies negotiations

Vice Adm. William Gortney, head of the U.S. Naval Central Command, said in a Pentagon briefing from Bahrain, “The United States government policy is to not negotiate.”

Well and good. Nice public relations comment now that Capt. Richard Phillips is once again a free man. However then why did it take so long, and the Captain have to make a second escape attempt in order to be freed? Why was there F.B.I. negotiators on hand and finally why did the navy send a small boat with a negotiator out towards the life raft . One that was shot upon by the pirates and forced to turn around.

Why the news reports of negotiations falling apart and then the demand of 2 million dollars made public?

Not to compound this but should not at least the Sec of State Hillary Clinton have at least made this statement to the world press. If not the President himself Obama come out and made the statement that we do not negotiate.

Neither said a thing until now that it is over. The statement comes from the navy in a press conference.

Could it be as simple as this. The State department was going to pay off these pirates even though we had assets in place to take the Captain back and free him. That if not for the second escape attempt in which the navy SEALS capitalised upon , killing three of four pirates and securing Capt. Phillips. That the White House and staff want to show leadership by taking credit for events that unfolded without their (lack) leadership.

No matter, the bottom line is good. Richard Phillips is free and three pirates are dead.


Here is what our President had to say about the whole situation, during and now that it is over.

“I am very pleased that Captain Phillips has been rescued and is safely on board the USS Boxer. His safety has been our principal concern, and I know this is a welcome relief to his family and his crew.

I am also very proud of the efforts of the U.S. military and many other departments and agencies who worked tirelessly to secure Captain Phillips’s safe recovery.

We remain resolved to halt the rise of piracy in this region. To achieve that goal, we must continue to work with our partners to prevent future attacks, be prepared to interdict acts of piracy and ensure that those who commit acts of piracy are held accountable for their crimes.

I share the country’s admiration for the bravery of Captain Phillips and his selfless concern for his crew. His courage is a model for all Americans.”

About me

  • I'm Devious Mind
  • From Denver, Colorado, United States
  • Good judgemnt comes from experiance. Experiance comes from bad judgement. Karma, its a bitch.
My profile
Powered by Blogger