In todays politically correct enviorment it seems that certain acts are considered free speech. Well that is if it is done by only those in a minority. If a minority protests those they do not like it is ok. However lets put the shoe on the other foot. Lets say if the majority protested the minority is this racism?

If the minority claims it is then it is. Thats Political correctness at work.

Now you ask what am I eluding to. Well I am talking about those subversives in Derechos Humanos and other open boarder activists. Recently Sheriff Joe Arpaio held a book signing for a book (duh) that he had writen, at the Barnes and Nobel in Tucson, Thursday, July 10, 2008.

Now we all know that Sheriff Arpaio has a low tolerance for those who break the law. He is old school and does not believe in the humanitarian p.c. approach of rehabilitation. He goes with what works. He makes you do the time for the crime.

Lately this American Hero has taken a hard line against a certain group of criminals. Yes CRIMINALS, amazing huh. That a Sheriff would choose to ENFORCE THE LAW. The group targeted, ILLEGAL ALIENS. Yes the law breakers who ignore immigration law and enter this country without permission.

Now what is the issue of free speech. Well it seems that those who wanted to protest the sheriffs book signing decided to burn in effigy the Sheriff. Well the efigy is more or less a spin on what was used. There is a vast differance between a dummy dressed and marked to look like a person and the piñata that they used.

The piñata was treated like a piñata. It was beaten and torn assunder with sticks. Then it was set alite. Leading the protest was a Pima county official, Isabel Garcia Public Defender.

Now a big problem is that she is a represenative of the court. Even though she makes a living defending criminals. She represents law and order. Yet here she goes out and leads a violent protest that includes chants of harm, inuendos of harmful acts, and basiclly threats to the life and health of Sheriff Arpaio.

A county official. Amazing huh. Not really. She after all is of the minority right?
Therefore its not racim to attack a white man who supports ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW. To run around carring the head of the pinata in the aftermath of the demonstration as a trophy. No it is free speech right?

No it is a perversion of the 1st amendment. All these claims that you havce a right to say what you want is correct, TO THE POINT only if you remember you are to be held responsible for your words and actions. Something these protestors refuse to remember. Other wise why do whe have slander/liable laws. Why do they take any threat against a sitting president serious. After all it is free speech.

Free speech comes with self responsibility as well. You can not just yell fire in a movie theatre. Words have an outcome.

Now if AMERICAN CITIZENS were to hold a protest outside of the Pima county law offices of the public defenders. Protesting this Isabel Garcia. Calling her what she is, a subversive, open boarder antilaw enforcement bigot. Well then the protest would be called racist. Especially if she was burned in effigy. Then we would have hate crime charges and investigations into a socalled threat of her life. All because the show is put on the other foot.

The reply would be she was only burned in effigy as a protest to the open boarder and support of ILLEGAL ALIENS movements.

Make no mistake about it. This was not a protest as they claim against Sheriff Arpaio. This was a public display of threats, bodily harm, and racist hatred to a MAN who ENFORCES THE LAW.