Friday, June 30, 2006 

The Facist antismokers on the move

Well it is now official. Colorado has forever pushed a second class status onto those who enjoy smoking. As of midnite tonight , Friday 30 June, it is against the law to smoke in resturants,and bars. Forceing those who enjoy a legal activityout into the weather.

Many of these do gooders are rejoiceing and paradeing around like a bunch of prepubescent teens who have discovered what sex might be. They have a gleen in their eye as now they are looking to ban smoking in your personal car, and in your home. Want to talk about big brother and an invasion of personal pricvacy and elimination of personal rights.

If you have not paid attention , let me clue you in on some part of the adgenda that these "its only for your health" s$%^heads are pushing. Law suits against the fast food chain are starting toline up. Remember when they tried to force fast food chains to use only orlean oil for their fries claiming it was healthier. All the people it made sick , not to mention it made fries taste terrible. Well here they come with this again.

If you have children better beware as there are inititives that want to ban you from smoking in the privacy of your own home. Why, because silly you have children. They want to ban it in your car and every where they can. My question to these jerks is this..... IF YOU HATE SMOKE THAT MUCH WHY DO YOU NOT SIMPLY OUTLAW THE ACTIVITY?

The reason they won't is two fold. One they want all the extra monies that the absurd tax on cigarettes brings in to fund thier welfare programs, and the second reason is power. It makes them feel good to know that they are able to control your life.

If smoking were as bad as they claim it would be outlawed!

I myself plan on saving some by quiting ........ not smoking but quit eating out at resturants and clubs ect. I figure seing how I do eat out alot now that by brown bagging it I can save myself from 50 to 80 dollars a week. Soon I will have my vacation fund up and a trip to some nonfacist place that will allow me to lite up before, during , and after my meal is on the way.

As for the next rude person who asks me in a disgusted voice on the elevator if I smoke .... be ready because I will ask you if you shower because the B.O. isnt me. I use SOAP!

Thursday, June 29, 2006 

Berkeley has money to Burn

This has to be the one of the more stupidest things that Berkeley has done. Talk abut a mute point and for God's sake get over it. The city of Berkeley is going to spend 10 million dollars to put on this upcoming ballot a IMPEACH Bush inititive.

How freaking stupid. Only Congress has this authority and even those idiots know there is no justification for impeachment proceedings.

Berkeley Wants Bush Impeachment Vote

http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/29/91459.shtml?s=ic

The left-leaning city of Berkeley will let voters decide whether to call for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

The City Council voted Tuesday night to put the advisory measure on the Nov. 7 ballot. The move is symbolic because only Congress has impeachment powers.

Some cities, including San Francisco and Oakland, have passed resolutions calling for impeachment, but supporters say Berkeley would be the first city asking voters to decide.

Only 5 percent of Berkeley voters are registered Republicans and Democrat John Kerry received more than 85 percent of the city's vote in 2004

The measure says the administration violated the Constitution with illegal domestic spying, justified the Iraq war with fraudulent claims and illegally tortured citizens.

The city will spend $10,000 to put the measure on the ballot.

"The whole idea is to start a grass fire surging up on this issue," Councilwoman Dona Spring said. "We hope other cities put this on the ballot as well. Just in the Bay Area we could get 2 or 3 million votes, which would be a very powerful statement."

HEY DONA ..... THE WHOLE IDEA IS LAME AND A WASTE OF MONEY. IF YOU LEFTIST COULD NOT GET THIS DONE DURING PRESIDENT BUSHES FIRST FOUR YEARS WITH ALL YOU TRIED WHY DO YOU WANT TO WASTE TAX PAYER MONEY LIKE THIS. DON'T YOU HAVE SOME WELFARE SOCIAL PROGRAM YOU CAN SLAP ONTO YOUR TAXPAYERS? COME ON THIS IS JUST ABSURD. TEN MILLION DOLLARS ON A MUTE POINT, WITH LEADERSHIP LIKE THIS NO WONDER WE ARE HAVING FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. THIS IS A PRIME EXAMPLE OF HOW WHEN YOU ELECT IDIOTS THEY SCREW YOUR WALLET.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 

No Greater Gift ...

No greater gift hath man to lay down his life for his fellow man.

(from Michelle Malkin .... http://michellemalkin.com/)

The DoD announced today the death of Staff Sgt. Raymond J. Plouhar, 30, of Lake
Orion, Mich.:

A U.S. Marine and one-time recruiter who appeared in Michael Moore's acclaimed documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" has died in a roadside bombing in Iraq.
Although Staff Sgt. Raymond J. Plouhar willingly appeared in a segment of the 2004 film, his father, Raymond, said Tuesday that his son didn't realize that it was for a movie critical of the war.

Raymond Plouhar said that all his 30-year-old son ever wanted to do was serve his country.

"I remember when he fell in the bathtub and cut his chin when he was 6 years old, and the only way I could get him to go to the hospital was to tell it was a MASH unit," Raymond Plouhar said. "I'm proud that my son wanted to protect the freedom of this country whether we all agree with the war or not."

The younger Plouhar died Monday of wounds suffered while conducting combat operations in the Al Anbar province of Iraq, the Defense Department announced Tuesday.

Plouhar, of Lake Orion, about 30 miles north of Detroit, was assigned to 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, First Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton, Calif.

He signed up for the Marines immediately after graduating from Lake Orion High School, where he wrestled and played football, his father said in a telephone interview.

The 57-year-old Plouhar said his son took four years off from active duty to serve as a recruiter in Flint after donating one of his kidneys to his uncle.

During that time, the Marine was filmed as part of "Fahrenheit 9/11," about the Bush administration's actions after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The 10-year Marine's sister and grandfather served in the Army. He had only 38 days left in Iraq and had been there a little more than four months during his most recent tour, his family said.

"I'm devastated, sad and proud," Plouhar said of his only son. "This just makes me devoted even more to his belief that people need help in Iraq, and he felt that he was helping."

He said his son was teased a lot as a young kid and protected people as he grew up.

"He liked to protect the underdog," the father said. "All of his buddies from school called saying, `He was my friend when nobody else would be.'"

(IF THIS DOES NOT CHOKE YOU UP INSIDE YOU HAVE NO HEART)

As a highly skilled marksman, he is trained to make split-second decisions in life and death situations. Likewise, he did not hesitate to react when he received the news of a family member in distress..
Second Marine Division's Sgt. Raymond J. Plouhar decided to give the gift of life - - in the form of one of his kidneys - - to his uncle, Tim Kennedy.

The sergeant from Surveillance, Target and Acquisition Platoon, Weapons Company, 2d Battalion, 2d Marine Regiment, was home on leave for Easter 1998, when his mother told him of his uncle's hospitalization.

Kennedy, a husband and father of two girls, was diagnosed with renal kidney failure, a potentially life-ending disease that required an organ transplant, according to Plouhar.

"As soon as I found out, I offered to be tested [as a donor]," said the Lake Orion, Mich., Marine.

Plouhar's wife, Leigh, was hesitant about his eagerness to donate at first.
"I was angry at him," she said." I was upset 'cause he didn't discuss it with me. He just decided to do it."

Leigh's concern centered on her own immediate family - - her husband and their toddler, Raymond.

"It took her a few months to agree," said Plouhar. "I explained to her that when they're in need, you help family. That's the way I was raised."

The Marine's command also ensured that he understood the repercussions of organ donation.

Plouhar sought the advice of his platoon sergeant at the time, Staff Sgt. Greg S. Tyler, now a scout/sniper instructor at Stone Bay.

"I told him to think of his family first," said Tyler of Santa Ynez, Calif. "I reminded him that this could affect the rest of his life."

"They (his command) were really supportive," Plouhar said.

He was also advised that he might be charged convalescent leave and would incur all medical costs if complications occurred. Additionally, he was advised that if he died during or after the operation, he would forfeit his serviceman's group life insurance benefits.

The infantryman knew the risks associated with the procedure and conducted his own feasibility assessment. He researched the disease and consulted with a U.S. Naval medical officer to preclude a hereditary condition.

"At age five, my dad lost a kidney, but has since lived a healthy life," he said in defense of his rational. "If I do develop problems later in life, donors in Michigan are considered top candidates for organ replacement."

Later in 1998, the II Marine Expeditionary Force Commanding General granted approval shortly before Plouhar deployed to the Mediterranean region with the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit.

The transplant was performed Jan. 9, which coincidentally is Plouhar's grandmother's birthday.

THIS IS WHAT JOHN MURTHA, AND JOHN KERRY CALL TERRORIST. A MAN WHO WAS GIVING AND CAREING. A MAN WHO LAID HIS LIFE DOWN FOR THOSE HE NEVER KNEW, IN A FORIEGN LAND. THIS IS NOT A TERROST BUT A REAL HERO!!!!

SEMPER FI SSGT ..... R.I.P.

 

Where is Murtha?

Just where is ol Murtha now. He has called the United States the biggest threat to world peace, however the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claims to have fired a chemical warhead rocket into Isreal.

With this breaking news tell me who is the real threat to world peace and humanity. A nation that is liberating people from oppresion and letting them taste the fredoms of democracy, or is it a group of punks looking to release genocide on another group of people.

TELL ME JOHN ...... WHO IS THE REAL THREAT BUDDY?

 

Is It about to hit the FAN?

GO ISREAL GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lets face facts here. The goat herders in Palestien claim to have chemical weapons. They kidnap an Isreali soldier, and hide him away. Now the reports are they have kidnapped an 18 year old settler and MURDERED him. On top of this the ollie oxen free brigade (al-Aqsa Martyrs) say they have fired a chemical ladden rocket into Isreal.

Isreal has shown great restraint up untill noew in trying to get their citizen/soldier back. (OUR GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO TAKE LESSONS IN THIS).

If these religious zelot camel jockey, goat herding, dung loving, italian table cloth wearing degenerates have actually fired chemical weapons into a civilian populance. Let the fire works begin. Why?

Pretty damn simple you bleeding hearet morons ....
1) Chemical weapons are banned by the Geneva Convention.
2) It is an attack against an INNOCENT populance.
3) Palestinians have been asking for it with unprovoked attacks and
Murder of Isrealies for years.
4) The palestineans never wanted peace and now they may rep what they have sown.

From Reuters

Gaza militants say fired chemical-tipped warhead
Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:39pm ET

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2006-06-29T013909Z_01_L29258645_RTRUKOC_0_US-MIDEAST-ROCKET.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

GAZA (Reuters) - A spokesman for gunmen in the Gaza Strip said they had fired a rocket tipped with a chemical warhead at Israel early on Thursday.

The Israeli army had no immediate comment on the claim by the spokesman from the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, an armed wing of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement.

The group had recently claimed to possess about 20 biological warheads for the makeshift rockets commonly fired from Gaza at Israeli towns. This was the first time the group had claimed firing such a rocket.

"The al-Aqsa Brigades have fired one rocket with a chemical warhead" at southern Israel, Abu Qusai, a spokesman for the group, said in Gaza.



An Israeli military spokeswoman said the army had not detected that any such rocket was fired, nor was there any report of such a weapon hitting Israel.


THE QUESTION REMAINS IF THEY HAVE FIRED A CHEMICAL WARHEAD HOW WILL ISREAL RESPOND AND WITH WHAT FEROCITY.

Monday, June 26, 2006 

Who is a threat?

This is just terrific. The Aksa Martyrs Brigades announced on Sunday that its members have succeeded in manufacturing chemical and biological weapons. Now this should send a cold shiver down every ones spine.

They dig tunnels, launch missle attacks, and keep killing innocents. Now they put into thier arsenol chemical and biological weapons. Weapons that are banned by international law. Where is the leadership from the Democratic party screaming about this. NO WHERE TO BE FOUND. Instead you have John Murtha out making absurd statements that the United States is the real threat to world peace.

Whos side is he on???????

Sunday, June 25, 2006 

People are getting fed up

As the ILEGAL Invasion debate heats up, more and more American Citizens are getting the picture. Those who favor open boarders are also trying to get special privlages under the law. They already recieve special discounts on education, lack of being hindered by health insurance as they recieve free medical that Citizens have to pay for. Along with not having to worry to much about breakjing the law. They easily brak the law then claim racism if they are stopped and asked about thier legal status to be here. No auto insurance wich forces American Citizens to have to pay more every time one of these migrant workers gets drunk or stoned and drives. Lower interest rates on home loans and preferential treatment all alround.

American Citizens are finally haveing enough of this crap. More and more organizations and petition drives are popping up nation wide. In an effort to force the LWA to be enforced with common sense towards American Citizens first.

The response from the activists is not surpriseing at all. They fire back with the same old rhewtoric of racism and oprresion. All lies and spin on the truth.

In San Bernidino county the response by these activists is asault and legal manuvering to keep thier privlaged staus safe:

Immigrant-Rights Activist Slaps Opponent, San Bernardino Police Say

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-immig24jun24,1,7049117.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

(excerpts follow)


In another twist to the brewing battle over an anti-illegal immigrant ballot measure in San Bernardino, an immigrant-rights activist was cited for battery Friday after allegedly slapping the proposal's author following a court hearing on the measure.

Roberto Valentine, a member of the Riverside-based group National Alliance for Human Rights, was questioned by San Bernardino County sheriff's deputies after the incident outside the courthouse in San Bernardino. If convicted, he could be fined or jailed for the misdemeanor.

The confrontation began outside the chambers of Superior Court Judge A. Rex Victor, where several dozen people waited to learn the fate of a voter initiative that would ban illegal immigrants from renting apartments in San Bernardino.

San Bernardino's city attorney, who has requested that the measure remain on the ballot, asked for the court review because of questions raised about the number of required signatures.

Valentine reached for Turner and was blocked by others in the crowd, but then appeared to strike Turner on the cheek with an open palm.

The court hearing was the latest test for the proposal, which has angered immigrant-rights groups since Turner began the initiative petition process in October.

His plan would effectively ban day-labor centers, punish employers who hire illegal immigrants and require city business to be conducted only in English.

In May, Turner submitted the required 2,216 signatures, forcing the City Council to consider the measure.


MORE AND MORE SUCH INITITIVES ARE BEING PROPOSED AND PUT ON THE BALLOTS. NO ONE IS AGAINST IMMIGRATION BUT IT IS FAIR TIME THAT THEY OBEY OUR LAWS AND ASSIMILATE TO OUR CULTURE. PAY THIER OWN WAY AND STOP SPONGING OFF THE SYSTEM.

AMERICANS ARE TIRED AND FED UP WITH SEVERAL GENERATIONS LIVING HERE WHO STILL CAN NOT SPEAK ENGLISH. AMEWRICANS ARE FED UP WITH NOT BEING ABLE TO ORDER A BURGER AND FRIES BECAUSE THE SERVER CAN NOT SPEAK ENGLISH.

AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF BEING INVOVLED IN AN AUTO ACCIDENT THEN FINDING OUT THE PERSON WHO CAUSED THE ACCIDENT DOES NOT HAVE INSURANCE. WHILE THE AMERICAN THEN HAS TO SUFFER NOT ONLY THE INSULT OF PAYING FOR REPAIRS BUT WATCHING HIS RATES GO UP.

AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF GOING TO THE HOSPITOL ON AN EMERGENCY AND THEN HAVING TO WAIT FOR HELP OR BE SENT SOMEWHERE ELSE BECAUSE THE E.R. IS FULL OF RUNNY NOSES AND HAYFEVER SUFFERES. THEN RECIEVING AN INFLATED BILL TO OFF SET THE AID ILLEGALS DO NOT PAY FOR.

 

Howell Raines, a joke

What an assertion being made by the former New York Times Executive Editor. He claims Fox makes up its news and the Fox fan base knows it but ignores the truth.

"The One That Got Away,” Raines new autobiography, he writes: "Fox, by its mere existence, undercuts the argument that the public is starved for ‘fair’ news, and not just because Fox shills for the Republican Party and panders to the latest of America’s periodic religious manias. The key to understanding Fox News is to grasp the anomalous fact that its consumers know its ‘news’ is made up."

He further writes "Fox Television showed us the future - outright lies and paranoid opinions packaged as news under the oversight of Rupert [Murdoch], a flagrant pirate, and Roger Ailes, an unprincipled Nixon thug.”

After these quotes is there any wonder at jelousy or perhaps a little envy at his own folly? Raines – who, ironically, resigned over made-up stories at the Times, now claims that Fox is not fair and balanced and is hiding an adgneda that panders to the right. Yet in his pouting he fails to mention any made up stories from the networks. Stories that were never checked out and ran with without basis, but with a politiacl slant in order to make sertain administrations look bad .... ie: Rathers anti Bush pieces, Courics fluff with Kerry, and Clinton.

No mention of this and the minute by minute pandering to the extreme left by the MSN. Raines book is more of the same whinning by the left. A new attack useing the same old lines.

What is sad here is that he tries to play off Foxes popularity by insinuating that followers of Fox are brainwashed right wing zelots. Those who would blindly follow any conservative notion blindly. What he fails to mention is that Fox is popular because it does not mix its news reporting and opinions. It does keep them seperate.

Fox shows an hour of news followed by an hour of commentary. Foxes commentators are popular because of their critics of both the left nad right. Despite some propagandist assertions Bill O'Rielly is neither left or right but a moderate. Neil Covuto covedrs buisness with common sense. He interviews and gets to the bottom of buisness topics.

Interruptions to the commentary shows are actual news reports from the Fox news desk. They are not made by the commentators but actual reporters who are held to basic standards of journelism. Not demeaning oped pieces past off as actual news.

Howell Raines need not look any further then the National Inquirer, or World News Daily for his next job. His own credentials speak loudly enough on his idea of what journelism is. Tabloid slant and immaginary aliens who have infiltrated the White House. Howell Raines is unemployed and looking for some way to make money. What better way then to appeal to the left conspiracy thinkers and run an anti Fox story.

Friday, June 23, 2006 

Money is not the Answer

Oh Good Grief. Here we go again. The answer from the left is always more money . Build this, pay this ..... we can buy the solution.

Actress Susan (I am better then you because my head is up my A$%)Sarandon says "Build Schools not Wall s in Mexico." Does she not know that qwe already send MILLIONS to Mexico as it is and the corrupt officials there just pocket as much as they can and do what they want. Thier schols falsely teach what happened in the Mexican American war and fail to talk about the treaty of Guadalupe.

So why is it she thinks if we build schools the problem of ILEGALS will go away. It is simple. A answer from the left that allows them to keep thier heads burried in the sand. Ignoreing the reality and truth of what is happening.

Sarandon: Build Mexico Schools, Not Wall

http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/22/214443.shtml?s=ic

Susan Sarandon, outspoken actress and liberal political activist, thinks the United States should help build schools in Mexico -- not walls along the border.

Visiting a preschool in a slum bordering a vast, municipal garbage dump in Tijuana, Mexico, Sarandon said education was the key to improving lives in Mexico. She criticized a U.S. congressional proposal to extend walls along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border.

The school was founded by New York educator David Lynch, who came to Tijuana in 1980 as a volunteer teacher. He later built the school for the children of Mexicans who eke out a living gathering recyclable material from the dump.

Sarandon, who has starred in movies such as "Thelma & Louise" and "The Client," has been supporting the project for years.

"I'm very proud, especially with the world careening out of control," she said. "People feel they have no control over their lives. I think this school is helping people to get control over their lives."

SHE IS RIGHT EDUCATION IS A KEY FACTOR IN STOPPING THE INVASION FROM THE SOUTH. HOWEVER WHAT IS TAUGHT IS MORE IMPORTANT THEN BUILDING NEW SCHOOLS. LOOK AT THE SHAPE OUR SCHOOLS ARE IN. A MORAL AND ETHICAL STANDARD OF TEACHING NEEDS TO BE SET. AS WELL AS A CHECK ON THE CREDENTIALS OF WHO IS HIRED TO TEACH. THIS MEANS QUALIFIED TEACHERS NOT JUST SOCIAL ENGINEERS WHO PUSH A POLITICAL LEFT WING ADGENDA.

 

Update In Miami

Over on Michelle Malkins blog she already has details of how the left are starting to play the race card on the arrests of these PUNKS.

JIHAD IN MIAMI
By Michelle Malkin

http://michellemalkin.com/

 

HomeGrown Jihadists

Chock up another one for the good guys. In miami 7 anti American wannabe murderers have been caught and are in jail. A fate to good for them in reality as they will be comforted with lawyers at public expense, three squares a day, cable television, freedom of thier oppressing cult that passes for religion. Being allowed their freedom to practice their prayers and read their little extremists propaganda, and preach to others trying to convert them to jihadist ways.

Locals say that these punks were training in the open, would do calestenics at night and wear their garb in public. These punks made no effort to hide thier training and conspiritor ways.

At least the FBI busted them, unfortunately I can hear the ambulance chasers lining up in a mass rush to protect their rights and claim it is ok to plot to kill Americans. I wonder how long it will take before the first motion to dismiss will be filed on grounds of the 4th amendment, saying rights were violated.

 

Links Added

Wooooaaaahhhhhhh Nelly. Stop hoarsey . I have finally , I think gotten new links to the Alliaince up on this site and looks to be operational. I invite all to follow and check out the sites. Comment and discuss topics on hand. Like I ask with my blog, think your responses through and if you disagree please back up your opinions with some fact and basis for your thinking in order to promote dialog.

If not well then be forwarned you may not like the replies you get. Remember you set the tone and leval of discussion.

Thank you for the patience all the way around and enjoy

Thursday, June 22, 2006 

Why the Silence?

Murtha, Kerry, Boxer, Pelosi, Durbin, Dean, and other supposed leaders are so quiet after the Truth of the atrocities commited to our American Soldiers by those stinking camel jockies and goat hearders in Iraq.

Not all of them have even offered condolences at the loss of these brave men, let alone stood up in front of the press and called for the capture and EXECUTION of these piggies. When our brave men adn women show compassion, go out of their way to give medical attention to, and treat these scum with dignity ... YES DIGNITY, under the Geneva convention but do not receive any human tresatment in return. What do our service men and women expect to recieve. TORTURE, RAPE, HUMILIATION, AND FINALLY EXECUTION. All of which are violations of the Geneva Convention.

After this last case of murder by these ragheaded goat herders on two of our brave men and women no statement of condemnation has been made.

Instead the socalled democorrupts make the same gobbled B.S. trivial lines. Calling for a pull out, calling our troops names and not once giving support to them

This latest incident just confirms that there should be NO QUARTER and NO MERCY shown to these dress wearing chicken Sh^7s. They must be treated as rabbid dogs and shot on site, dragged out of thier homes, and publicly executed on the spot!!!!

 

Peaceniks turn Violent

The good ol rainbow peacenik families annual tree hugging, condemn all get together turned ugly. Well not that it was ever a beauty in the first place. These pompus arrogant morons didnt bother to file for a permit, when confronted about it they got out of hand. The real tradjedy is no arrests were made after they assualted several Park Rangers.

Forest Service abandons checkpoint after incident with Rainbow group

By Matt Stensland

http://media.steamboatpilot.com/drudge/37737.html

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

CLARK — The Rainbow Family peace gathering turned hostile Tuesday when a group of attendees began hurling rocks and sticks at law enforcement officers, U.S. Forest Service officials said.

The incident forced the officers to abandon a checkpoint they had established near the entrance to the Rainbow gathering campsite in North Routt County, Forest Service spokeswoman Diann Ritschard said. Officers had not returned to the checkpoint as of Tuesday afternoon.

The incident happened at about 11 a.m. and involved Forest Service officers who were manning the checkpoint set up to issue citations to anyone attempting to enter the gathering. Citations were being issued because Rainbow Family members had not signed a free Forest Service special-use permit, which is required for gatherings of 75 or more people.

Before the Tuesday morning incident, Forest Service officials were blocking people from entering the gathering and telling them to "turn around," Forest Service spokeswoman Denise Ottaviano said.

Officials said a group of about 100 people -- some of whom already were inside the gathering area -- participated in the incident. Other participants included people waiting outside the checkpoint who were told they could not enter the gathering, Ritschard said.

No arrests were made, and the officers left the scene because they did not want to escalate the situation, Ritschard said. No officers were injured.

"This incident will be investigated, and we're not exactly sure what course of action will be taken," Ritschard said. "The Forest Service is deciding what action to take."

In addition to Forest Service law enforcement officers, a Routt County Sheriff's Office deputy also was at the checkpoint at the time of the incident, Ritschard said.

"The Forest Service is very serious about the safety of our officers and cooperators," Ritschard said.

Also Tuesday, an incomplete special-use permit application was submitted to the Forest Service, Ritschard said. She said the application contained profanity where the applicant was supposed to write the location of the gathering. The application can't be accepted as submitted, Ritschard said.

Between 60 and 70 illegal gathering citations had been issued to Rainbow gathering attendees as of Tuesday morning. As many as 20,000 people are expected to attend the official peace gathering from July 1 to 7. About 500 people already have arrived.

Citations will be issued to people who use the closed trails or ignore other regulations, including:

Public nudity

Camping within 150 feet of any running stream or body of water

Placing kitchen facilities, food preparation areas, gray water pits or slit trenches within 300 feet of any running stream or body of water

Placing kitchen facilities, food preparation areas, gray water pits or slit trenches within 150 feet of any open road

Cutting any standing trees in the area described as: north of Forest Road 505, west of Forest Road 498, south of the private property in Big Red Park and east of Forest Road 500.

Also, about 15 miles of National Forest system motorized trails (numbers 1204 and 1199) near the Rainbow gathering have been closed. Ritschard said the trails were closed to keep the public away from the gathering.

"Most people would enjoy (trails) more at a place that is less congested," Ritschard said.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 

Working on links

To those who are wondering if I will ever get around to getting the links up for the Alliance. The answer is yes!!!! I am just slow at it. I will be getting them up as soon as possible.

Monday, June 19, 2006 

The Future of Energy.

Inbetween news snippets this morningn the same commercial popped up on the telivision. B.P.'s future of energy. All these people asking what are you doing for us. This commercial just grates on my nerves as it is so much propaganda like THETRUTH.COM and thier misleading lies.

Where does the future of energy stand/ Lets look at who holds it up. The tree hugging crowd has for thirty years blocked through legal manuvers the building of any new nuclear plants, refineries, and the drilling for natural resources. Who yells the loudest about the price of fossil fuels? The tree hugging crowd. While they fill up thier F-250's and huge S.U.V.'s. which they drive and park in parking lots outside their offices. Not having any reason for such a large vehical other then to keep up with the Jones. The soccer mom crowd chaffers around the kiddies in thesze large vehicals with televisions for the kids to watch. Really unnecissary. I remember my mother packing us into the old squareback volkswagon and taking us and friends around as kids.

The tree huggers complain about any proposed hydro dams to produce electricity yet demend a congressional investigation when their homes drop below 80 degrees in the winter. They demend alternative sources yet at every turn they have lawyers waiting in line to stop the development and progress in alternative sources for fuel.

It just boggles the miond at the hypocracy the treehuggers have. If you doubt what I am saying just take a close look at any yuppie nieghborhood near you.

 

World Cup Soccer

The American team is now 7th I understand and a game out from playing the number one team Brazil. So why is the ratings of this sport so low in America. Is it a lack of understanding for the game? Is it the fact this sport is being shoved down our throats is more like it.

Lets face facts, untill the United States wins the Championship it will never be all that popular with Americans. Soccer is not an American sport and Americans just are not that interested in it. The loyal fan base in this country comes from those who have immigated both legally and illegally from around the world.

Americans love crash and burn, physical impact, and nachos and beer. Soccer just is not the setting for any of this unless the fans get involved in fights. Then Americans tune in and check out the bedlame that insues.

We all remember in high school the differances in the soccer team and the football team. The local town crowd shows up for the friday night game but is not there for the saturday or thursday afternoon soccer game. Why .... because soccer is for the most part boreing to Americans. If there were more PELE's playing maybe more would be interested in this game.

I know at work there are a couple of hard core soccer fans, they even started a pool for the winner of the World Cup. Despite alot of initial interest many are being dissapointed because they are not winning anything over the choices and to be honest other then those who are fans of the game .... all three of them , the rest do not talk about it except to ask if they won.

If the media wants to push sports upon us they need to consider what Americans want. A sport more like Rugby would be popular and get the ratings over soccer.

Sunday, June 18, 2006 

More Ilegal stats

Here are more stats on the cost of ILLEGALS.

Illegal aliens are guilty of 1 million sex crimes a year. Based on a one-year in-depth study, the Violent Crimes Institute in Atlanta estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each.


The study analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 and included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegals. The offenders located in 36 states topping the list are in California, followed by Texas, Arizona, New Jersey, New York and Florida.


The study arrives at the figure of 240,000 offenders, a conservative estimate, through public records showing that about 2 percent of illegals apprehended are sex offenders. This translates to 93 sex offenders and 12 serial sex offenders coming across our borders illegally each and every day.


The study of the 1,500 cases shows a total of 5,999 victims and each sex offender averaging four victims. This places the estimate for victimization numbers around 960,000 for the 88 months examined in the study. Breaking down the 1,500 cases reviewed, this figures as follows:

525, or 35 percent child molesters
Of the child molestations, 47 percent of the victims were Hispanic,
36 percent Caucasian,
8 percent Asian,
6 percent African-American, and
3 percent other nationalities.
358, or 24 percent rapes
617, or 41 percent sexual homicides and serial murders
The victims ranged in age from 1 to 13 years, with the average age being 6! Not only were the victims raped, but 6 percent were also mutilated! The crime scenes were bloody, indicating angry perpetrator personalities. Most of the victims were rendered incapable of fighting back, then raped and murdered. The most common method of killing was bludgeoning, followed by stabbing.

The highest number of sex offenders, according to the study, came from Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua and Puerto Rico. Sixty-three percent of the sex offenders had been deported on another offense prior to the sex crime. Most of them had previous arrests for DUI, assault or drug-related offenses prior to the apprehension for sex offenses. Eighty-one percent drank or used drugs prior to offending.

GREAT JUST MAKES ME FEEL ALL THE SAFER COME CINCO DE MAYO TIME.

(INFO FROM NEWSMAX ... George Putnam http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/6/15/210942.shtml)

 

Colorado's cost for ILEGALS

After the leftist pushed through thier counter tabor admendments that will cost Colorado taxpayers millions on friviolus spending and welfare programs. A study was done to examine this.

The Rice report has sopme very starteling figures that need to be widely shared.

The total cost to Colorado of illegal immigration for Medicaid, K-12, education and incarceration is $1,025,518,839 per year. That number includes $64,531,983 of State General funds spent on Medicaid for illegals.

Rice also estimates an additional economic loss to Colorado workers of $2 billion ($2,030,807,803) caused by the downward drag of illegal labor to wages paid by Colorado employers.

This is only the cost to Colorado, what about the cost nation wide? If Colorado is looking at 2 plus BILLION dollars, the country has to be in the hundred Billion area.

The open boarder crowd says they are not costing us, or hurting us. Federal stats show that there are well over 250,000 felons that have snuck over the boarder. Thats CHILD MOLESTERS, RAPISTS, AND MURDERERS.

So what is the price we are willing to pay?

SOME MORE FACTS FROM THE RICE REPORT:

1 out of every 21 Coloradoians is ILEGAL.

In Colorado,of all the ilegal alien head of households, 11%getfood assistance,12% are on medicaid, 18% are useing major welfare programs.

In 2002, Ilegals accounted for 12% of all births.

Colorado is one of 15 states with more then 100% growth from 1990 to 2000 of the limited English proficiency population.

For every one person who moves to Colorado, TWO (2) arrive from other countries many which are ILEGAL ALIENS.

MANY MORE ALARMING FACTS CAN BE FOUND AT:

http://www.defendcoloradonow.org

CLICK ON THE STUDIES LINK, OPEN THE PDF FILE AND LEARN.

 

Hillary Panders yet again

Why does not the MSM ever report the truth when it comes to their leftist comrades? It is just amazing how with all the so called political journelist none of them pick up on her spinning of the law and the truth. The fact she has no platform other then to the crowd she is speaking to at the moment the press gives her a pass.

Here is some of what she had to say:

"Having lost so much of my own privacy in recent years I have a deep appreciation of its value and a firm commitment to protecting it for all the rest of you," she said, prompting laughter from the audience of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy.
(THE LAUGHTER MUST BE FOR THE FACT SHE NEVER LOOKED FOR THEIR PROTECTION.)

She ruefully called herself an "expert" in the loss of privacy. What lose I ask. As the first lady, a world public figure the lose of privacty is FBI files on republicans then hid them from investigators?
(THE PRIVACY SHE REFERS TO IS THE COVER UP SHE MANAGED TO ATTAIN WHILE UNDER INVESTIGATION ON SOME OF HER MORE QUESTIONABLE ACTIONS WHILE HER HUSBAND WAS SLEEPING AROUND WITH INTERNS. HILLARY WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE SHE WAS THE TARGET OF A VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIROCY WHEN IN FACT ALL SHE WAS WAS A SUSPECT IN AN INVESTIGATION. SHE LOSED NO MORE PRIVACY THEN ANY OTHER PERSON WHO MAY HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW.)

Hillary urged creation of a "privacy bill of rights" Friday to protect people's personal data. Hillary also waded into the debate over anti-terror eavesdropping. For almost a year, Democrats have hammered at the Bush administration over the National Security Agency's program of domestic wiretapping without warrants from judges. The administration insists it is both legal and necessary.

Well it is legal, and not only did it have judicial oversight in the form of warrents it has checks and balances. What is Hillary and the Democrates afraid of. Why are they so opposed to LEGAL searches and information gathering? They are afraid (demonstrated in their figned outrage over the search of a congressional office) that their underhanded actions become public. Her goal is to make it much harder for lawenforcement. Not a ralley to protect personal rights.

The fact it is necessary in the gathering and protecting of U.S. citizens, if you have nothing to hide then why worry.

The administration's refrain has been, "Trust us,'" said Clinton. "That's unacceptable. Their track record doesn't warrant our trust. ... Unchecked mass surveillance without judicial review may sometimes be legal but it is dangerous. Every president should save those powers for limited critical situations."

"Trust us", isnt that what we heard for 8 years under her hubby? The fact her track record is very questionable, not to mention that her leadership abilities are suspect. I wonder what she considers a critical situation? The fact that there are organized groups of paramilitary terrorists who want to see not just you and me DEAD. But our very way of life. A way of life Hillary claims to support and defend. If this does not qualify as a critical situation then what does according to Hillary.

Again she panders to the left leaning progressive thinking crowd that give true liberals a very BAD name.

Saturday, June 17, 2006 

Personal Spending is FEMA's responsibility

The L.A.Times tries hard to spin the lack of or more appropriately the irresponsible spending that accured during the aftermath of hurricane Katrina on FEMA. Yes it is true that FEMA had some very poor managment. It did rack up some very strange spendatures. However to blame FEMA for the complete lack of common sense and extravegant spending that the hurricane victems made.

What the times is esurting is that it is governments job on everthing and that the individual has not to worry about personal responsibiltiy. This is one of the base principles of far radical leftist thinking. Government will take care of and provide for the people.

Here is how the times sums up its opinion of the Hurricane Katrine, Fema debacle:

It's easy, and necessary, to criticize FEMA's across-the-board incompetence in responding to the largest displacement of Americans since the Civil War. But obsessing about the spending habits of refugees comes perilously close to blaming the victim.

SO WHO IS TO BLAME THEN WHEN RELIEF MONEY IS HANDED OUT AND PEOPLE COME BACK FOR MORE MONEY BECAUSE THE NEW TELEVISIONS AND TATOOS THE HAVE DOESNT PUT FOOD ON THE TABLE AND A TEMPORARY ROOF OVER THEIR HEADS ..... LETS BLAME FEMA. HOW ABOUT BLAMING THOSE WHO ARE AT FAULT ... MAYBE FOR ONCE THE VICTEM IS RESPONSIBLE.

A hurricane of fraud?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-fema17jun17,0,4807430.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials

 

Pompusidiocy

POMPUSIDIOCY ..... the ability to demonstrate a lack of common sense while displaying an overabundance of inflated egomania.

prime examples of this ..... the leaders of the democratic party.
Prime Minister/Aberjahadin(spelled something like
that) of Iran
Kieth Oberman
The Dixie Chicks
Jessie Jackson
John Murtha
John Kerry
you get the picture

 

Dixie Chicks just do not Get it.

On March 10th, 2003, Natille Maines opened her mouth and showed disrespect for the President of the United States and her personal ignorance. The flap that reared up lead by their fans ( I was one, note: was) seemed mind boggeling to the Dixie Chicks.

Why are people so antidixie chick they wondered. How dare they censor our music and burn our cd's. How dare anyone in the country music industry speak out against us. This thinking spouted by lead singer Natile Naines made the rounds of talk shows and other leftist outlets.

Now, with a new album out and thier video getting airtime on VH1 Natile and the sisters open thier mouths again and demonstrate why singers and performers should be seen and not heard.

"The reaction was as if Natalie had said 'Death to the President' or something," says violinist and vocalist Maguire. (Maguire is one of trio in the chicks)

"It was the bullying and the scare factor," shudders banjo and guitar player Robison. "It was like the McCarthy days, and it was almost like the country was unrecognisable."

[Amazing how they shift, and twist what really happened to them. It was not a so called McCarthyism. It was the fans holding the Chicks to the first admendment. Showing the Chicks that say anything you want is fine BUT YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT YOU SAY. The claim of a witch hunt against them is amazing. The fact that the vast majority of thier once fans did not care for the Chicks left leaning political views and voiced the FAN opinion just wasn't fair to the chicks. (SARCASM ON THAT COMMENT)]

"A lot of artists cashed in on being against what we said or what we stood for because that was promoting their career, which was a horrible thing to do," says Robison, the other sister in the group.

Alot of artists cashed in .... yeah maybe they did, maybe it was the fact that those artist wanted to show that even if they personally did not agree with the war they would still support the troops and the Country in this time. Most of these stars had the intelligence to distance themselves from maroons like the chicks. Obviously the chicks are jelouse of the fact others did not loose their fan base.

Now here has to be the quote of the week. Maines oopens her mouth and shows just how stupid, lack of common sense, and basicly what a material self centered bitch she is.
"The entire country may disagree with me, but I don't understand the necessity for patriotism," Maines resumes, through gritted teeth. "Why do you have to be a patriot? About what? This land is our land? Why? You can like where you live and like your life, but as for loving the whole country… I don't see why people care about patriotism."

Lets look at her nonreality based thinking is on this statement. First she is correct, we do not have to agree with her at all. This the fans demonstrated by complaining to the radio stations and CMT music channel. Forceing the nonplaying of Chicks songs. Why do you have to be a patriot she asks. HMMMMM, good question. No one says you have to be. I do not see any organization running around twisting arms and demanding you be a patriot. I do see organizations and groups coming out and saying we do not agree with Natiles left views and and anti American feelings.

This land IS our Land Natile. We love America from the left coast to the Statue Of Liberty. Remember the purple mountain majesty? We love that too. From the hot arid part of Texas you come from to the frosty mornings in Alaska. We love this land Natile. This is AMERICA, we love America!!!!

Part of loving America is loving all of it. Maybe some parts more then the others, and a few people more then others, but we love America. Those of us who are willing to stand up and defend bafoonish, morons like you Natile, you call patriots. Most of us call ourselves AMERICANS.

The DIcxie Chicks are more then welcome to express their opinions. It is thier right as AMERICAN CITIZENS to do so. It is our right on the same hand to express our opinions about the Dixiw Chicks and what they say.

As for loving all of this land, maybe the Chicks need to get out of their air condition busses and see America. Not just the cushy places they stay but the farmer who does work, the small town mechanic, the volunteer fireman, the guy who is driving their equipment truck, and other blue collar folk. The backbone of this country. I'll bet if asked these people would say they love this country and all the land.

Personal responsibitlity. Say what you like, but remember you reep what you soe.

Friday, June 16, 2006 

The Numbers Just get BIGGER AND BIGGER

At first we heard it would only be 10 million, now look at the figures.

Washington Times

14 million aliens forecast to get amnesty

More than 9.9 million illegal aliens now in the United States will receive amnesty under an immigration-reform bill passed by the Senate, though about a quarter will do so fraudulently, and the bill allows for 4.5 million family members to join them in the United States, according to a report.

"Of the 14.4 million illegals and their family members who will receive amnesty, we estimate that 13.5 million will eventually become permanent residents, which means they can stay as long as they wish and apply for citizenship," according to the report released yesterday by the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).
The report, written by CIS Research Director Steven A. Camarota, said the projected 14.4 million figure does not include other expected increases in legal immigration allowed by the bill. The Heritage Foundation predicted in a report last month that the number could total 193 million in the next 20 years.

MY GOD ... 193 MILLION ILEGALS IN THIS COUNTRY. WHERE IS THE RULE OF LAW? WHY IS AMERICA BECOMING THE CESSPOOL FOR THE WORLD. EVERYDAY I READ MORE AND MORE REPORTS OF ILEGALS COMMITING CRIMES AND BEING ALOUD TO GET AWAY WITH IT. WITH NO FEAR OF DEPORTATION AND OVERCROWDED PRISONS AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT WILL BE LONG GONE IN 20 YEARS REPLACED WITH A THIRD WORLD NATION MEEKING OUT A LIFE OF POVERTY AND CRIME.

 

Who are the real Vandals along the Boarder

With the reconquistas spilling out their vile name calling and lies, this act of criminal intent against not only personal property but America itself.

Minuteman Border Fence Vandalized

June 16, 2006 10:04 AM MDT

Minuteman Border Fence Vandalized

By Mark Stine, KOLD News 13

There are holes in a border fence put up by the Minuteman Project. Volunteers with the border watch group built it last month near Palominas. But someone tore it up.

The new Minuteman fence resembles the current border fence and it now has even more similarities because parts of it are in pieces.

"We expected some sort of statement from across the border, but we didn't think they'd go this far," says Jack Ladd as he drives along the new Minuteman border fence that sits on the edge of his ranch, and assesses the damage. "If anything, it's going to show the people of the United States it's even worse than what they thought."

An 800-foot section of the three mile barbed wire fence was cut.

"Cut so cleverly that it could not be repaired, it has to be restrung because it's cut right here at the post," says Carmen Mercer of the Minuteman Project.

"It's very disappointing and of course we'd like to know what happened. If it was reaction from the other side, if it was reaction from, I don't know, question mark there."

The Minutemen aren't surprised someone wanted the new barrier destroyed, but they are surprised the culprits weren't caught in the act.

"Especially over the lengths that it was done. It's just surprising to me that it was not getting the attention of the border patrol when it happened."

And since the act of vandalism, the volunteer group is increasing security along the fence line to keep it from happening again.

"We'll be there to prevent that, you better believe it."

The Minutemen say they've reported this vandalism to the Cochise County Sheriff's Department and hopefully they will be able to find out who destroyed the fence.

OH HEY THIS FENCE IS BLOCKING MY WAY OF ENTERING AMERICA ILEGALLY. LETS CUT IT DOWN.YOU MIGHT THINK THAT THIS WAS DONE BY THOSE LEFTIST IN BOULDER WHO THINK ALL PROPERTY IS PUBLIC WHEN IT COMES TO THIER RIGHT TO GO HIKING.

 

What are the Authorities doing?

This is a travisty beyond belief. Just what in the hell are the authorities being paid for? The fact that they (our officials) refuse to enforce the immigration laws but to not do anything to this REPETE OFFENDER (a reminder that this is the type of person who open boarders claims is only looking for a better life ... but at whos expense now with a body count of 2)

Man not deported after 14 arrests.

http://www.fairviewobserver.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060616/NEWS03/606160405/1321/MTCN06

Gustavo Reyes Garcia, 28, has accumulated dozens of criminal charges and been arrested 14 times in Nashville without being flagged by federal authorities for being in the country illegally.

He caught their attention after he was accused of killing two people on June 8. It was his 15th arrest. (AN ILEGAL ARRESTED 15 TIMES! WHY WASN'T HE DEPORTED OH SAY 7 ARRESTS AGO? NOW 2 PEOPLE ARE DEAD AT THE HANDS OF THIS MIGRANT)

Garcia stands accused of drinking, getting behind the wheel of an SUV and killing Mt. Juliet couple Sean and Donna Wilson while fleeing from police last week.(OH FLEEING POLICE .... WAS HE PROFILED THEN. WILL HE USE THAT LAME EXCUSE AS A DEFENSE?)

Garcia's past charges include four DUI arrests, evading arrest, and two separate incidents in which he was accused of leaving the scene of an accident where there was bodily injury.

Law enforcement officials could not explain yesterday how he managed to escape the attention of immigration authorities in the past.
(COULD NOT EXPLAIN? HELL THIS GUY IS A DRUNK REPETE DRUNK DRIVEING REPETER. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SERVING TIME AFTER HIS FOURTH DRUNK DRIVING ARREST. AS A MATTER OF FACT WHAT IN THE WORLD WAS HE DOING STILL ALOUD TO DRIVE AFTER PREVIOUSE ARREST? HE DIDNT FALL THROUGH THE CRACKS HE WAS IGNORED AND SET LOOSE ON AMERICAN CITIZENS.)

Thursday, June 15, 2006 

Owens finds a backbone

With the Colorado Supreme Court playing political correctness and pandering to the open boarder, reconquista, LaRaza, and any other minority squeeky wheel, Gov. Bill Owens finally decides to get tough on an issue.

After the court voted down the Defend Colorado Now petition with a 4 to 2 vote on a technicality they have overlooked or ignored many times in the past. A past that is disgustingly politically aligned with a leftist adgenda. Owens has threatened to call the state legislature back into session if the court keeps playing games.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/9376189/detail.html

DENVER -- Backers of a proposal to cut off most state services to illegal immigrants headed to a rally at the state Capitol Thursday as they wait to see if the state Supreme Court will reconsider its ruling blocking the measure from November's ballot.

Gov. Bill Owens says he will call state lawmakers back to work if the court doesn't reverse itself.

Defend Colorado Now said it already has about 34,000 petition signatures in hand and up to 20,000 more people have signed petitions still being circulated. Director Fred Elbel said the group hopes people will return those petitions Thursday and take new petition forms to circulate.

On Monday, the court ruled 4-2 that the measure couldn't appear on the ballot because it violated a constitutional requirement that initiatives deal with only one subject. Attorney General John Suthers has said he plans to appeal.
(THE COURT IGNORED THIS ON THE GAY MARRIAGE AND RIGHTS INITITIVES).

It's too late for backers to introduce a revised proposal, so they want to keep collecting signatures in case the court clears the measure. The deadline for submitting petition signatures to get on the ballot is Aug. 7.
(EVEN THOUGH THE WORDING ON THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE SAME SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN 2004)

An appeal to the Supreme Court must be filed by June 26. There's no deadline for the court to decide on whether to reconsider but Owens said he would give the court several weeks to decide before calling lawmakers back.
(THE COURT OF COURSE WILL TRY TO PROLONG THIS A LONG AS THEY CAN TO KEEP IT FROM THE VOTERS WHO STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS INITITIVE).

 

Vandels vs Coconspiritors

Not only is the temperature heating up but so is the activity in the AMERICAN (THATS THE UNITED STATES NOT ATZLAN) southwest.

Americans fed up with those who coconspire, and aid ILEGALS to enter this country are dumping water stations out. Spilling the subversive support of rehydration of ILEGALS onto the ground.

Note how all through this story the newspaper has a tone of support for the open boarder crowd and an anomosity towards those hard working TAXPAYING CITIZENS who are saying enough is enough and trying to stop the flow of ILEGALS into this country by ending aid to them.

Amber Lyon Reports
Vandals drain desert water tanks intended for illegal immigrants.

"We try to save people from dying from dehydration," said Paula Mich, a volunteer with Humane Borders.

Mich, along with hundreds of other Humane Borders volunteers, travels into the wilderness each day to refill tanks with water meant for the lips of illegal immigrants crossing the border.

Marked with a blue flag, the jugs are placed deep in the desert just outside Tucson in areas where volunteers say the most illegal immigrants have died from dehydration.

"We save lives by doing this," said Humane Borders Volunteer Frank Saavedra. "I don't know how many, but if it's only one it's worth it."

Not everyone agrees with Humane Borders placing water tanks in areas heavily trafficked by illegal immigrants.

Mich says vandals have been coming out to the water stations, pulling the caps off the tanks and dumping the water out into the desert.

The volunteers also say vandals are destroying the blue flags that fly atop 30-foot poles in the middle of the desert -- flags the immigrants look for when seeking out a water station on their journeys.

"Flags have been destroyed, and not in this station but in others. They've put bullet holes [the water tanks]," Mich said.

Mich also says each week Humane Borders finds at least one or more of their 70 water tanks vandalized, an act these volunteers say can kill.

"If they're planning on getting their water at that location and they get there and there's no water, then the next time they could get water could be not before they die," Saavedra said.

Russ Dove, a local immigration activist, says he understands why people trash the tanks.

"The vandal issue is a sign that Americans have had enough," Dove said, "and from observation, I think it's only going to get worse."

Dove says Humane Borders is helping illegal immigrants, some he calls criminals, cross the border safely.

"These are robbers, rapists, murders. This is simply aiding and abetting criminal activity," Dove said.

The volunteers, however, say the border crossers are innocent, crossing in search of a better life.

"We're going to continue to do this regardless of how many empty tanks we find," Mich said. "We're going to continue to do this."

NOTE THE OPEN DEFIANT DISRESPECT FOR AMERICAN LAW. THE OLD BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL LEFTIST ATTITUDE "IF IT SAVES ONLY ONE LIFE".

WELL HELL LETS PUT THE SHOE ON THE OTHER FOOT. IF IT ONLY SAVES ONE LIFE, A RAPE, A CHILD NOT BEING MOLESTED ISNT IT WORTH STOPPING ILEGALS COMING ACROSS THE BOARDER.

 

Wrong yet Again

We are definately getting closer to the election. Unfortunately instead of coming up with something positive and leading the Democratic party is embraceing the same old cliches, piss poor atitudes, and rhetric that lost them the last elections.

There is good things happening in Iraq despite what the MSM says and reports. The culture of corruption is more prominate on their side of the isle then the republican but spin the truth and see what is reported and what is denied.

Who are the real extremists and name callers ..... look to the election in North Carolina and the despicable comments made from the Democrats.

On the national scene it is the same old same ol. As the leftists will only support extreme stances and simple absurdities.

Here look at Fiengolds comment:

Feingold was the first senator to call for a timetable to bring back troops, a popular position at the Take Back America conference.


"Run, Russ, run," some chanted as the Wisconsin senator stepped to the podium. Others wore buttons and stickers with the same sentiment.


"They got it wrong in Iraq," Feingold said to applause. "Iraq was a mistake."

"There will not be progressive change in this country this year or any other year if we think we can win by default, or by running out the clock," he said.

So instead of showing some of this backbone he calls for, finding a leading strategy that is good for America, and being a leader he claims to be. The reiteration of the same old slock is all that is offered.

 

Interesting reading

A very well writen and interesting read. Posting over on the blog .... Just another Neocon with a clue. Carnivore looks at the immigation issue and makes some good points. Here is the web addy for the blog:

http://neoconwithaclue.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, June 14, 2006 

Who is the Alarmist? Gore

As Al Gore goes around promoting his scare tactic movie. Blaming man on the climate changes, and global warming the truth is coming out from the scientific community that actually works on figureing out global changes and climate trends.

Appearing before the Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development last year, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years." Patterson asked the committee, "On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"

Patterson concluded his testimony by explaining what his research and "hundreds of other studies" reveal: on all time scales, there is very good correlation between Earth's temperature and natural celestial phenomena such changes in the brightness of the Sun.

Dr. Boris Winterhalter, former marine researcher at the Geological Survey of Finland and professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, takes apart Gore's dramatic display of Antarctic glaciers collapsing into the sea. "The breaking glacier wall is a normally occurring phenomenon which is due to the normal advance of a glacier," says Winterhalter. "In Antarctica the temperature is low enough to prohibit melting of the ice front, so if the ice is grounded, it has to break off in beautiful ice cascades. If the water is deep enough icebergs will form."

Dr. Wibjörn Karlén, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden, admits, "Some small areas in the Antarctic Peninsula have broken up recently, just like it has done back in time. The temperature in this part of Antarctica has increased recently, probably because of a small change in the position of the low pressure systems."

Gore tells us in the film, "Starting in 1970, there was a precipitous drop-off in the amount and extent and thickness of the Arctic ice cap." This is misleading, according to Ball: "The survey that Gore cites was a single transect across one part of the Arctic basin in the month of October during the 1960s when we were in the middle of the cooling period. The 1990 runs were done in the warmer month of September, using a wholly different technology."

Karlén explains that a paper published in 2003 by University of Alaska professor Igor Polyakov shows that, the region of the Arctic where rising temperature is supposedly endangering polar bears showed fluctuations since 1940 but no overall temperature rise. "For several published records it is a decrease for the last 50 years," says Karlén.

Dr. Dick Morgan, former advisor to the World Meteorological Organization and climatology researcher at University of Exeter, U.K. gives the details, "There has been some decrease in ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic over the past 30 years but no melt down. The Canadian Ice Service records show that from 1971-1981 there was average, to above average, ice thickness. From 1981-1982 there was a sharp decrease of 15% but there was a quick recovery to average, to slightly above average, values from 1983-1995. A sharp drop of 30% occurred again 1996-1998 and since then there has been a steady increase to reach near normal conditions since 2001."

Concerning Gore's beliefs about worldwide warming, Morgan points out that, in addition to the cooling in the NW Atlantic, massive areas of cooling are found in the North and South Pacific Ocean; the whole of the Amazon Valley; the north coast of South America and the Caribbean; the eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, Caucasus and Red Sea; New Zealand and even the Ganges Valley in India. Morgan explains, "Had the IPCC used the standard parameter for climate change (the 30 year average) and used an equal area projection, instead of the Mercator (which doubled the area of warming in Alaska, Siberia and the Antarctic Ocean) warming and cooling would have been almost in balance."

Gore's point that 200 cities and towns in the American West set all time high temperature records is also misleading according to Dr. Roy Spencer, Principal Research Scientist at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. "It is not unusual for some locations, out of the thousands of cities and towns in the U.S., to set all-time records," he says. "The actual data shows that overall, recent temperatures in the U.S. were not unusual."

Carter does not pull his punches about Gore's activism, "The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science."

What so the scientists c\say about Gore's movie? Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment: "Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."

Carter is one of hundreds of highly qualified non-governmental, non-industry, non-lobby group climate experts who contest the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are causing significant global climate change. "Climate experts" is the operative term here. Why? Because what Gore's "majority of scientists" think is immaterial when only a very small fraction of them actually work in the climate field.

Now that more truth is exposed and to take a line from the leftists .... the truth is Gore is useing scare tactics to promote his scewed point of view on a situation he has no knowledge or education about.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006 

New Conservative Blog Alliance

A new blog alliance is being established on the blogsphere. I was contacted by a founding member.
Tip to his blog ...
http://histereenow.blogspot.com/2006/06/right-flank-newbies.html

I am proud to accept his offer to join and will get the links up soon. I look foward to spreading some common sense, cause a little thinking to happen, and help show how far to the left this country has fallen.

I invite all readers to go and look, check out the links and participate in discussions through well thought out, fact based responses.

 

Colorado the fight Continues

It is far from over here in Colorado. The State Supreme court may be playing political correct games but the citizens of Colorado are speaking out. Here is a letter form Defend Colorado Now.

June 12, 2006
DCN update: Colorado Supreme Court Ruling

In late January, 2006, the Defend Colorado Now (DCN) initiative was
challenged in the Colorado Supreme Court by opponents who claimed the
initiative title was not a single subject as required by Colorado statute.
Although the Court quickly issued rulings on other initiatives this year,
saying they were single subject, the Court delayed issuing a ruling on the
DCN initiative until June 12.

On Monday, June 12, 2006, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a ruling on
the DCN initiative saying in effect that they do not want Coloradans to
vote on the initiative in November. The Court, in a 4-2 ruling, stated
that the initiative was not a single subject. (see ruling:
http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/opinions/2006/06SA20.pdf ).

Yet in 2004, the same court issued a ruling that said the title of the
initiative was indeed of a single subject. (See ruling:
http://www.defendcoloradonow.org/info/about.html#history ). Why the
about-face? We can not imagine that the Supreme Court would partake of
judicial activism. We do know, however, that we have rallied thousands of
volunteers and tens of thousands of voters on the DCN initiative. Polls
show that voters overwhelmingly want illegal immigration stopped. We will
have no problem collecting the required number of signatures and we
envision the initiative being passed by a majority of Colorado voters.
Perhaps the Court does not envision this future.

We are not giving up - not by a long shot. The people of Colorado have
spoken on the illegal immigration crisis and DCN will continue to respond
to their wishes, even though their elected public servants and judges do
not. We will be filing a motion for rehearing and we stand a chance of
reversing this decision. We and our volunteer supporters will continue to
collect petition signatures. This issue is too important to cast aside.
Our children and grandchildren will judge our actions taken today.

Volunteer circulators: please collect as many as signatures as you can and
then mail your petitions back to us this week. Please continue to collect
signatures - we can send you fresh petitions. Call 303.863.8203 to get
new petitions.

Sincerely,


Fred Elbel

Defend Colorado Now
www.DefendColoradoNow.org
PO Box 280289
Lakewood, CO 80228


WE AS CITIZENS MUST LET OUR VOICES BE HEARD ON THIS TOPIC. WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUPPORT THIS INITITIVE, SHOULDNT YOUR VOICE BE HEARD ON THE TOPIC. POLITICALLY CORRECT MOVEMENTS WANT TO SILENCE YOU AND DENY YOUR RIGHTS. RIGHTS GRANTED NOT ONLY IN THE STATE CONSTITUTION BUT IN THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION.

WRITE, CALL, VISIT YOUR STATE LEGISLATURE AND LET THEM KNOW WE HAVE A VOICE AND DEMAND THE RIGHT TO DECIDE THIS ISSUE.

STOP ILEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF OUR TAX MONIES TO FORIEGNERS AND HELP OUR OWN CITIZENS IN NEED NOW. SIGN A PETITION TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, June 12, 2006 

Colorado sells OUT

Defend Colorado Now has been delt an absurd blow below the belt by the Colorado Supreme court. A court that forgewts who it is supposed to be defending in judicial matters.

Defend Colorado Now has been circulating a petition to allow the voters to decide whether or not tax payers should be fitting the bills for ILEGAL ALIENS. The proposed bill would stop free medical for ILEGAL that citizens have to pay for. While ending welfare to ILEGALS as well when there are citizens who need it.

Here is what the sell outs on the supreme court said.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday that a proposal to deny most state services to illegal immigrants cannot appear on the November ballot.
The proposed constitutional amendment, promoted by Defend Colorado Now, violates a state constitutional requirement that initiatives deal with only one subject, the court said in an unanimous opinion.
The measure aimed to decrease public spending for the welfare of illegal immigrants in Colorado and restrict access to administrative services, the ruling said.

Here is thier phone numbers:

Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey (303) 861-1111 Ext 271
Justice Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. (303) 861-1111 Ext 248
Justice Alex J. Martinez (303) 861-1111 Ext 261
Justice Michael L. Bender (303) 861-1111 Ext 241
Justice Nancy E. Rice (303) 861-1111 Ext 266
Justice Nathan B. Coats (303) 861-1111 Ext 255


A tecnicallity is what the supreme sell outs are dening this petition on. In the meantime Colorado taxpayers have to continue to foot the bill for ILEGALS while also paying for the same sevices as citizens.

Saturday, June 10, 2006 

Victory for Justice

yes thats right. It is a victory for common sense and for justice in America. Arizona stands behind Maricopa county and the enforcement of human smuggleing and coconspirators.

Arizona Upholds Immigrant Smuggling Law

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/09/D8I511001.html

By JACQUES BILLEAUD
Associated Press Writer


A judge on Friday upheld an Arizona law that made immigrant smuggling a state crime, rejecting arguments that it was never intended to target immigrants _ only the human traffickers they hire.

Judge Thomas O'Toole said there was no evidence that lawmakers "intended to exclude any prosecution for conspiracy to commit human smuggling."

Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas has used the law to charge more than 200 people, most of them immigrants accused of paying to be smuggled into Arizona.

Defense lawyers and the law's author said it was intended to apply only to smugglers. Defense attorneys also called it an unconstitutional attempt by the state to regulate immigration, which they contend is under the exclusive control of the federal government.

The Arizona Legislature passed the law in August amid growing frustration over the state's porous 375-mile border with Mexico and the huge health care and education costs for illegal immigrants and their families.

The Pew Hispanic Research Center estimates that 500,000 of the state's population of about 6 million are illegal immigrants.

In the case decided Friday, 48 illegal immigrants were charged as conspirators to human smuggling after they were discovered in a pair of furniture trucks in March about 50 miles west of Phoenix. Some have pleaded guilty to solicitation to commit human smuggling, a lower-tier felony that carries up to a year in jail.

Timothy Agan, one of the attorneys who challenged the law, said he plans to appeal the ruling to the Arizona Court of Appeals.

The law's use has been limited mostly to Maricopa County, the state's most populous county and a hub for smugglers transporting illegal workers across the country.

COMMON SENSE PREVAILS IN THE FACT THAT ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW IS NOT BEING SWAYED YET BY THE BLEEDING HEART OPEN BOARDER CROWD. OF COARSE THIS WIL END UP IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. LETS JUST HOPE COMMON SENSE HAS BEEN RESTORED THERE.

 

Unpopular ????

Here is a question for those liberal progressive thinkers who keep saying the war on terrorism is unpopular.

Why then has the Army made its recruitment goals yet again, making it 12 straight months. Hey you progressive liberal thinkers ... put this is your dope pipe and smoke this ...... THATS 12 MONTHS THE ARMY HAS MADE ITS RECRUITMENT GOALS.

If the war is unpopular then why are people enlisting?

Thursday, June 08, 2006 

The Left: What a JOKE

They just won't give up thier spin and the fact they are wrong. Before you read what this BAFOON had to say today about the elimination of the number two schmuck Abu Musab Zarqawi. Write this address down and get ready to write a letter.


Contact info for Rep. Stark:

WASHINGTON, DC
239 Cannon Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-5065
202-226-3805 (fax)

FREMONT
39300 Civic Center Dr.
Suite 220
Fremont, CA 94538
510-494-1388
510-494-5852 (fax)

E-mail: PETEMAIL@HR.HOUSE.GOV

Now here is what this moron had to say about the fine work done by our Military.

The death of terrorist leader Abu Musab Zarqawi in Iraq was a stunt to divert attention from an unpopular and hopeless war. "This is just to cover Bush's [rear] so he doesn't have to answer" for Iraqi civilians being killed by the U.S. military and his own sagging poll numbers, said Rep. Pete Stark, California Democrat.

What reality is this idiot in. Oh yeah Presdient Bush and Donald Rumsfield have kept this punk under wraps all along untill a time that poll numbers dictated his removal.

When will the left ever give credit when credit is due without spinning their absurdities and political adgenda on it.

 

Justice comes to Zarqawi

What a great day. One wakes up verey rarely to good news being reported by any of the MSM. Today is one of those days. Lt.(coward) Ehren Watada should be able to relax a little now.

With forensics being performed on the remains of the thug Al-Zarqawi evidance is coming in that this punk is dead. A brief firefight and then an air strike put an end to a murderous punk.

The question remains who is going to become the next thug to step up and cowardly attack innocents in the name of Allah now.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006 

A Coward and a Disgrace

It is said that a soldier is the last person who wants to go to war. This is true. The last ones who want to go are those who are the first to go. For with pride and intestinal fortitude the go forth to do a job others are AFRAID to do.

When you take the oath, you swear uphold and defend the Constitution of The United States from enemies both foriegn and domestic. You may find yourself in some sink hole, smelling of rot and who knows what else in some third world piss tank. Then again you may end up in a lush dream post some where.

Bottom line is this person signs a contract. A contract, you know a legal document that two parties agree to with give and take by both sides. In this case you give 8 years of your life for money and travel. Which means the government can send you anywhere at anytime for any reason. Why you are getting paid, you swore an oath. However to some an oath and contract do not mean anything other then a strange concept that applies to everyone else but them.

Lieutenant Watada is one of these disgraceful, cowards who think he can go back on his word. Not only is he both a coward and disgrace to the Uniform he PRETENDS TO WEAR, but he is an insult to all those brave souls who proudly and commendabley wore that uniform before him.

This piss poor excuse for an officer needs to be drummed out in full DISGRACE, PUBLICLY STRIPED OF HIS RANK AND ALL BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN WHO SERVED AND HAVE SERVED TURN THEIR BACKS ON THIS PIECE OF GARBAGE.

This wannabe signed up, signed the contractg after hostilities in Iraq began in 2003. he knew full well the chance he would someday have to go and lead men in war. Especially with the world events going on when he signed up.

Not only is this THIEF guilty of stealing tax payer money in order to get a collage education he is guilty of disobeying a LAWFUL ORDER.

As a LT in the Army his job is not to make policy or hold public forums on national policy. His job is to go and enforce that policy by what ever means he is told to.

Lieutenant Watada is guilty of several articals under the U.C.M.J. .... uniform code of military justice. A code that is more restrictive and morally just then public law.

Artical 94 states:

ART. 94. MUTINY OR SEDITION
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.

(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court- martial may direct.


Article 85—Desertion:

“(a) Any member of the armed forces who—

(1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently;

(2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or

(3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another one of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States remain away therefrom permanently is guilty of desertion.

(c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) Desertion with intent to remain away permanently.


(a) That the accused absented himself or herself from his or her unit, organization, or place of duty;

(b) That such absence was without authority;

(c) That the accused, at the time the absence began or at some time during the absence, intended to remain away from his or her unit, organization, or place of duty permanently; and

(d) That the accused remained absent until the date alleged. Note: If the absence was terminated by apprehension, add the following element

(e) That the accused’s absence was terminated by apprehension.

(2) Desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service.


(a) That the accused quit his or her unit, organization, or other place of duty;

(b) That the accused did so with the intent to avoid a certain duty or shirk a certain service;

(c) That the duty to be performed was hazardous or the service important;

(d) That the accused knew that he or she would be required for such duty or service; and

(e) That the accused remained absent until the date alleged.

(3) Desertion before notice of acceptance of resignation.


(a) That the accused was a commissioned officer of an armed force of the United States, and had tendered his or her resignation;

(b) That before he or she received notice of the acceptance of the resignation, the accused quit his or her post or proper duties;

(c) That the accused did so with the intent to remain away permanently from his or her post or proper duties; and

(d) That the accused remained absent until the date alleged. Note: If the absence was terminated by apprehension, add the following element

(e) That the accused’s absence was terminated by apprehension.


Article 88—Contempt toward officials:

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) That the accused was a commissioned officer of the United States armed forces;

(2) That the accused used certain words against an official or legislature named in the article;

(3) That by an act of the accused these words came to the knowledge of a person other than the accused; and

(4) That the words used were contemptuous, either in themselves or by virtue of the circumstances under which they were used.


Article 92—Failure to obey order or regulation:

Any person subject to this chapter who—


(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;

(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or

(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) Violation of or failure to obey a lawful general order or regulation.


(a) That there was in effect a certain lawful general order or regulation;

(b) That the accused had a duty to obey it; and

(c) That the accused violated or failed to obey the order or regulation.

(2) Failure to obey other lawful order.

3) Dereliction in the performance of duties.

(a) That the accused had certain duties;

(b) That the accused knew or reasonably should have known of the duties; and

(c) That the accused was (willfully) (through neglect or culpable inefficiency) derelict in the performance of those duties.

Article 99—Misbehavior before the enemy :

“Any member of the armed forces who before or in the presence of the enemy—

(1) runs away;

(2) shamefully abandons, surrenders, or delivers up any command, unit, place, or military property which it is his duty to defend;

(3) through disobedience, neglect, or intentional misconduct endangers the safety of any such command, unit, place, or military property;

(4) casts away his arms or ammunition;

(5) is guilty of cowardly conduct;

(6) quits his place of duty to plunder or pillage;

(7) causes false alarms in any command, unit, or place under control of the armed forces;

(8) willfully fails to do his utmost to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy any enemy troops, combatants, vessels, aircraft, or any other thing, which it is his duty so to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy; or

(9) does not afford all practicable relief and assistance to any troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft of the armed forces belonging to the United States or their allies when engaged in battle; shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) Running away.

(a) That the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy;

(b) That the accused misbehaved by running away; and

(c) That the accused intended to avoid actual or impending combat with the enemy by running away.

(2) Shamefully abandoning, surrendering, or delivering up command.

(a) That the accused was charged by orders or circumstances with the duty to defend a certain command, unit, place, ship, or military property;

(b) That, without justification, the accused shamefully abandoned, surrendered, or delivered up that command, unit, place, ship, or military property; and

(c) That this act occurred while the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy.

(3) Endangering safety of a command, unit, place, ship, or military property.

(a) That it was the duty of the accused to de-fend a certain command, unit, place, ship, or certain military property;

(b) That the accused committed certain disobedience, neglect, or intentional misconduct;

(c) That the accused thereby endangered the safety of the command, unit, place, ship, or military property; and

(d) That this act occurred while the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy.

(4) Casting away arms or ammunition.

(a) That the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy; and

(b) That the accused cast away certain arms or ammunition.

(5) Cowardly conduct.

(a) That the accused committed an act of cowardice;

(b) That this conduct occurred while the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy; and

(c) That this conduct was the result of fear.

(6) Quitting place of duty to plunder or pillage.

(a) That the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy;

(b) That the accused quit the accused’s place of duty; and

(c) That the accused’s intention in quitting was to plunder or pillage public or private property.

(7) Causing false alarms.

(a) That an alarm was caused in a certain command, unit, or place under control of the armed forces of the United States;

(b) That the accused caused the alarm;

(c) That the alarm was caused without any reasonable or sufficient justification or excuse; and

(d) That this act occurred while the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy.

(8) Willfully failing to do utmost to encounter enemy.

(a) That the accused was serving before or in the presence of the enemy;

(b) That the accused had a duty to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy certain enemy troops, combatants, vessels, aircraft, or a certain other thing; and

(c) That the accused willfully failed to do the utmost to perform that duty.

(9) Failing to afford relief and assistance.

(a) That certain troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft of the armed forces belonging to the United States or an ally of the United States were engaged in battle and required relief and assistance;

(b) That the accused was in a position and able to render relief and assistance to these troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft, without jeopardy to the accused’s mission;

(c) That the accused failed to afford all practicable relief and assistance; and

(d) That, at the time, the accused was before or in the presence of the enemy.


Article 107—False official statements:

Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) That the accused signed a certain official document or made a certain official statement;

(2) That the document or statement was false in certain particulars;

(3) That the accused knew it to be false at the time of signing it or making it; and

(4) That the false document or statement was made with the intent to deceive.

THIS IS TOWARS HIS COMMISION. FOR HE OBVIOUSLY DEFRAUDED THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO GET HIS EDUCATION PAID FOR WHILE PLANNING ON NOT SERVING.

THESE ARE ONLY A FEW OF THE ARTICALS HE SHOULD BE TRIED UNDER NOT TO MENTION WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE CATCH ALL. ARTICAL 134 CONDUCT UNBECOMING.

This puke is a COWARD and a DISGRACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, June 05, 2006 

Which President is this?

This is an awsome write up about an American President that most will swear up and down is one rather then another. The truth will surprise you as to when and who this is about.

Is He the Worst President in American History?

by Mike Bellah

Depending on whom you read, he is either the worst or the most undervalued president in American history.

Fans see him as straightforward and unpretentious, simple and sincere.

His detractors interpret this as simplistic, uneducated, naive and ignorant.

Supporters say he is confident, funny and bold.

Some say arrogant, flippant and reckless.

He inherits a country evenly and deeply divided by opposing ideologies.

Critics say that he is himself the reason for much of the division. His election, they say, split rather than united the nation’s citizenry. They remind him often that he did not win a majority of the popular vote.

He inherits a war set in motion before his election and propagated by those opposed to the American idea of freedom.

Some say he provoked the war himself, that he overstated the case, that he prodded the enemy into action.

His stated goals are clear: to free oppressed people and to protect the long-term security of the nation.

He is accused of having a hidden agenda, of engaging the enemy for his own political gain and to further his own financial interests.

He believes war is unavoidable.

His critics say the war is unjust and unnecessary.

He believes freedom is non-negotiable.

His detractors say that compromise is possible, but that he would rather use brute military force.

He proceeds slowly and reluctantly towards armed conflict.

Some say he rushes to war.

He tries to gain consensus among the nation’s leaders.

He is accused of going it alone, of using the war powers of the president rather than the consent of Congress.

He gives frequent speeches laying out his reasons for a just war and his vision of the freedom it will win. He is candid about his intentions.

He is accused of moving in secret, of muzzling the press and silencing opposing viewpoints.

He stakes his presidency on the belief that all people are entitled to freedom and liberty.

He is accused of suppressing civil liberties, of violating the very Constitution he claims to uphold.

He mobilizes a trained and well-equipped army.

Yet the enemy proves ingenious and stubborn in its resistance. Its warriors fight on their own turf and are able to kill many brave American soldiers.

These casualties make the war and the president increasingly unpopular. If the tide doesn’t turn soon, he will not be elected to a second term.

His opponent for the upcoming election is a decorated military officer who advocates an end to the war, even if it means allowing the oppression to continue.

This Republican president is known for championing human rights.

His critics say that he and his army deny the human rights of POWs.

A religious man, his speeches are peppered with references to God and Scripture.

He is accused of using God for his own ends, of being a hypocrite.

He stays the course, refusing to give in or give up.

Nearing the end of his first term, conventional wisdom says he will be remembered as American’s worst president, that he will never receive the thanks of a grateful nation.

Only history can vindicate him.

And history does.

In 1864 Abraham Lincoln is the most undervalued president in American history.


From Mike Bellah

http://www.bestyears.com/worstpresident.html

Bet you thought he was describeing President Bush, didn't you.

 

LaCrosse team Reinstated

What a load of hooey and phooey from the administration at Duke University.

"I am, I know, taking a risk in reinstating men's lacrosse," school President Richard Brodhead said Monday in a statement. "The reinstatement is inevitably probationary."


What a risk, really sticking his neck out here (phhhhhhtttttt)..... not.

Brodhead said he didn't decide to reinstate the team until this weekend, after all remaining players agreed to a mission statement that emphasizes academics, tolerance and a code of conduct that, among other things, prohibits underage drinking, university officials said.

While evidance is loading up in the defenses favor on the allegations of rape from the three acused players. Duke is trying to still score points in the politically correct world.

Holdiong a still distateful and unsupportive attitude for the accused, the team, and the former coach. Duke administrators want every one to think they are being open and fair in their decision to allow the team to play next season under strict supervision and new rules of conduct.

Duke would really put their neck on the line if they showed support for innocent untill proven guilty and issues an apology when these three are found not guilty.

 

Cuban Sponsered Terrorist

As Hugo Chavez makes ties with Cuban Dicktator Fidel Castro, we need to look at why having Castro as a friend is not good for the average American.

DLN - National Liberation Directorate - Organization created in Cuba to
support revolutionary groups throughout the world. Responsible for planning
and coordinating Cuba's terrorist training camps in the island, covert
movement of personnel and military supplies from Cuba, and propaganda
apparatus.

ELN - National Liberation Army - Organized by the Castro regime, this
Colombian Marxist insurgent group was founded in 1965. Its main terrorist
activities includes kidnapings and extortion targeting foreign employees of
large corporations. Now rumored to be recieving finacial support from Chavez.

FALN - Fuerzas Armadas de Liberacion Nacional - A Venezuelan guerrilla
organization trained by Cuba in violence and terrorism. Many of its members are in positions of government under Chavez. Helping him maintain rule.

FMLN - Farabundo Mart National Front - Formed in 1970, the FMLN is a
terrorist Marxist-Leninist organization intent on establishing a communist
revolutionary regime in El Salvador. The FMLN was extremely active in its
terrorist campaign, receiving assistance from Nicaragua and Cuba. Younger members have branched out and are involved with MS -13. (hmmm, these punks are into extortion, murder, prostitution,drug running and thats just what they do here in the United States)

MRTA - Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement - Marxist-Leninist revolutionary
organization formed in 1983 and supported by the Castro regime. The MRTA's
intent was to establish a Marxist regime in Peru through terrorism, although
Peru's counter terrorism program diminished the groups' ability to
effectively carry out terrorist attacks. (Peru didnt play games with them, they went after these terrorists and eliminated them, exposeing them publicly to what they were doing and their lies as well as making them dissapear.)

THESE ARE JUST A SMALL SAMPLE OF CUBA'S MEDELLING IN CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA. THERE ARE MANY MORE GROUPS WORLD WIDE THAT CUBA HAS HELPED CREATE AND SPONSERED. MANY MUSLIM GROUPS , PLO, FATAH, AS WELL AS COMMUNIST INSURGENTS IN AFRICA.

ALL ARE PART OF CASTRO'S DREAMS, NOW PARTNERING WITH CHAVEZ. NOT A PEACEFUL MIX IS IT.

About me

  • I'm Devious Mind
  • From Denver, Colorado, United States
  • Good judgemnt comes from experiance. Experiance comes from bad judgement. Karma, its a bitch.
My profile
Powered by Blogger