Stupidity, or BDS?
In the previous post I mentioned the enviormental groups tryting to blame President Bush for the wildfires in California. Well here is one of those groups and what angle they are taking.
Before I get into thier out in left field ideas. More information is coming to light about the nature of what started these fires. As I posted, it is more conceivable in a conspirocy theory that ILLEGALS accidently started several of the fires then a government agent or agents starting them as posed by Randi Rhodes and Mike Malloy. It does appear that with the shooting of one arsonist and the capture of another that many of the fires are man made but not of a conspirocy nature. Facts in on one fire being started by a downed power line. Any ways lets move on to the nutbags.
http://action.foe.org/content.jsp?content_KEY=3406
Don't Let Bush Burn California
(excerpts from Friends Of Earth diatribe)
President George Bush is playing the hero again as he tours fire-ravaged California this week. Yet his expressions of concern are not likely to be taken well, since he has stood in the way of that state's effort to fight global warming emissions for the last two years!
(QUESTION, SHOULD NOT THE PRESIDENT WHOEVER IT MAY BE. GO AND VISIT DISASTER AREAS?)
No one fire can be blamed on global warming, but there is no doubt that changes in our climate are causing more fires that are more severe. The tragic events unfolding in California are yet another stark reminder that action is needed to combat global warming now, and the EPA should not stand in the way of California's lead.
(ONLY TRUE STATMENT IS THAT THE FIRES CANNOT BE BLAMED ON GLOBAL WARMING. WHOA TO THE TREEHUGGERS. WHAT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO THESE NUTJOBS IS THAT CERTAIN EFFORTS OF COMMON SENSE NEED TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE ENVIORMENT. IF YOU BUILD A HOUSE IN THE FORREST THEN CONSIDER NOT HAVING A TREE, AND BRUSH ALONG SIDE THE HOUSE, BUT A FEW YARDS AWAY.)
The rest of the artical goes on to talk about the Pavley Act of 2002. A good act that is not being implemented whole heartedly or followed by even these tree huggers. This act is for and about emission control. Now emission control and the wild fires connection is a bit of a stretch. Thgen to blame it on President Bush is nothing more then headline grabbing. This is the BDS (bush derangment syndrome), having nothing better to do then blame the President because of thier hatred for the man and what he stands for.
Before I get into thier out in left field ideas. More information is coming to light about the nature of what started these fires. As I posted, it is more conceivable in a conspirocy theory that ILLEGALS accidently started several of the fires then a government agent or agents starting them as posed by Randi Rhodes and Mike Malloy. It does appear that with the shooting of one arsonist and the capture of another that many of the fires are man made but not of a conspirocy nature. Facts in on one fire being started by a downed power line. Any ways lets move on to the nutbags.
http://action.foe.org/content.jsp?content_KEY=3406
Don't Let Bush Burn California
(excerpts from Friends Of Earth diatribe)
President George Bush is playing the hero again as he tours fire-ravaged California this week. Yet his expressions of concern are not likely to be taken well, since he has stood in the way of that state's effort to fight global warming emissions for the last two years!
(QUESTION, SHOULD NOT THE PRESIDENT WHOEVER IT MAY BE. GO AND VISIT DISASTER AREAS?)
No one fire can be blamed on global warming, but there is no doubt that changes in our climate are causing more fires that are more severe. The tragic events unfolding in California are yet another stark reminder that action is needed to combat global warming now, and the EPA should not stand in the way of California's lead.
(ONLY TRUE STATMENT IS THAT THE FIRES CANNOT BE BLAMED ON GLOBAL WARMING. WHOA TO THE TREEHUGGERS. WHAT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO THESE NUTJOBS IS THAT CERTAIN EFFORTS OF COMMON SENSE NEED TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE ENVIORMENT. IF YOU BUILD A HOUSE IN THE FORREST THEN CONSIDER NOT HAVING A TREE, AND BRUSH ALONG SIDE THE HOUSE, BUT A FEW YARDS AWAY.)
The rest of the artical goes on to talk about the Pavley Act of 2002. A good act that is not being implemented whole heartedly or followed by even these tree huggers. This act is for and about emission control. Now emission control and the wild fires connection is a bit of a stretch. Thgen to blame it on President Bush is nothing more then headline grabbing. This is the BDS (bush derangment syndrome), having nothing better to do then blame the President because of thier hatred for the man and what he stands for.
