The prosecution 1, Defense 3. Once again the prosecution looses another what should have been a slam dunk. I pray that God shows mercy to anyone who may harm my family or people I care about because the justice system has collapsed into a quagmire of self indulgeing fame wanting egos in jury pools.Obviousely facts are not important and logic is ignored. How can it be that within minutes of a verdict it is announced that one jurer has a book deal and others are seeking interviews with not only American press but with the international press. I could not believe my eyes when I saw the interviews on BBC.
What self indulgent people are there that get picked to pass judgement on someone? The decision to find Michael Jackson innocent was based on the fact the jury did not like the victems mother. What does she have to do with what may or may not have happened? Any way this is the common factor used by the jury on making their judgment. " As a whole we just did not like the mother".

First the prosecution allowed jury tampering and racial intimidation to decided a botched slam dunk in the O.J. case. Then in the Robert Blake case another dismal presentation by the prosecution may have possibly allowed yet another murder walk. I am amazed that a guilty verdict was rendered in the Peterson trial. Wss it because Scott did not have a whole lot of money? Or was it that he was an average white male? No I think it was because in that case a jury actually looked at the facts presented and rendered a proper verdict. No stars or racial implications. Just the facts and a murdered pregnant woman.

Lets take a look at the facts that I heard. In the Jackson case a male 40 plus in age, allowed young boys to sleep with him in his bed. Does this not send up some sort of red flag. Second his home did have child pornography hidden in his hidden room off of the bedroom. Now a hidden room off of the main bedroom that had a bed and other material.... again a red flag. Alcohol was withion reach of these children. This is ireresponsible, again a red flag. Now maybe Michael did not do anything but his holding his own child over a balcony and this other distinctly shows a man who should not be left alone with little boys and small children.
I can go on and on about the fact he has a historyu of paying large settlements to others who have accused him of molestation. Again another major red flag. I for one think that where there is smoke , the chances are there is a fire.
I suppose that the larger and most important question is one seldom asked . What parent would allow their child to spend the night with a person of Michaels questionable mental state. Then who in the future is going to allow their child to spend time with Michael now. More than likely lots of piss poor parents are going to be lineing up and pushing their children at him. Amazing how soon we forget.
If anything has come out of this whole trial we have learned two very important things. One Michael is definately creepy. The other is that people never learn. I guess there is a third and more important lesson here. One that I am sure many are going to argue. But third I have learned that the average jurer is like a deer in the headlights. Once the spot light is upon them they fold like a marionette for its puppettier. Bending and yielding to emotion and the flicker of promised fame.

I walk away still believing that Michael is guilty, O.J. did it, peterson got what he deserved and that if I see Robert Blake on the street I am heading the opposite way. Why, because there is no justice.