Political Bias of the New York Times
In what I think is a more then Kerry flub of the tounge and pure political bias of the left MSM. The New York Times again thinks it is ok to release or point out the location of what is classifieds documentation. This time they claim the current administration has either on purpose or inadvertantly been aiding Iran in their quest for nuclear power.
Directing traffic on the internet to a location that revealed documentation to Saddam's pursuit of the big bomb. The New York times tries to in my opinion sway voters against the current/republican power base. However here is a key point.
The New York Times has lead the charge that "Bush lied." However in their pursuit of a leftist congress they have undone themselves by proving that the only lie was on their part with the WMD's. Here they so cleaverly point out that Iraq was within a year of produceing the bomb yet for the last several years claiming that no evidance was ever produced or found that Iraq was even contemplating weapons of mass destruction.
So now who has been lieing? Has it been the NYT, and the conspirocy theorists that claim it was in inside job to the bombng of the two towers. Or is it the worlds intelligence community that lied. Those who specilise in deciphering and studing information of elusive nature.
I find this highly intrigueing as you can not have it both ways. There was no WMD production and possesion, yet at the same time trying to develope such things. In order to develope you have to have some basic capability or intent to do so. This is what the left say never happened . Now in their pursuit to sway elections they claim this was the case (the possesion and intent on WMD's).
Which is it I ask again. Either they did or they didn't. I personally will lean to the evidance presented by at least five leading intelligence agencies. I will also go with the idea that the times is a politically biased, left leaning organization that will stoop to any level to undermine the current administration and its efforts to protect us.
Directing traffic on the internet to a location that revealed documentation to Saddam's pursuit of the big bomb. The New York times tries to in my opinion sway voters against the current/republican power base. However here is a key point.
The New York Times has lead the charge that "Bush lied." However in their pursuit of a leftist congress they have undone themselves by proving that the only lie was on their part with the WMD's. Here they so cleaverly point out that Iraq was within a year of produceing the bomb yet for the last several years claiming that no evidance was ever produced or found that Iraq was even contemplating weapons of mass destruction.
So now who has been lieing? Has it been the NYT, and the conspirocy theorists that claim it was in inside job to the bombng of the two towers. Or is it the worlds intelligence community that lied. Those who specilise in deciphering and studing information of elusive nature.
I find this highly intrigueing as you can not have it both ways. There was no WMD production and possesion, yet at the same time trying to develope such things. In order to develope you have to have some basic capability or intent to do so. This is what the left say never happened . Now in their pursuit to sway elections they claim this was the case (the possesion and intent on WMD's).
Which is it I ask again. Either they did or they didn't. I personally will lean to the evidance presented by at least five leading intelligence agencies. I will also go with the idea that the times is a politically biased, left leaning organization that will stoop to any level to undermine the current administration and its efforts to protect us.
