Churchills back
Our favorite left wing revisionist is back at Boulder. Despite being fired for his lack of credentials, plagerism, and just simple inaccuraces in his thought process. he is back and lecturing at the university of Boulder.
In a lecture tuesday October 2nd the mush brains in Boulder, good ol Ward has informed students that he will began what he told students would become a series of classes held at the school despite being fired from his position in July.
Eliciting applause and handshakes from the majority of the 30 (my what a big crowd, phhht) or so CU students and area residents who came to hear Churchills lecture, which he titled “ReVisioning American History: (appropriate title considering his spin and lack of truth presented) Colonization, Genocide and Formation of the U.S. Settler State.”
Churchill, who did not allow the Camera to attend the class, said the group would come up with various topics to discuss. (no cameras? I wonder why. Not wanting anyone to be able to question his questionable facts perhaps).
“I’ve been invited by people who are concerned with content of the mind,” Churchill said.
Content of the mind? Now does this elicit questioning or not? What content is he trying to credit? Facts he has distorted and twisted in his mind to be able to support his "revisioned" history.
Supposedly big supporters of the 1st Amendment, two organisers useing thug tactics, refused several other C.U. students from listening or even entering the event to listen to Churchill. Claiming that those turned away were agitators and not needed in this forum.
So it is ok for Ward and his followers to go to other events and possibly dissrupt and distort these events and speakers. However it is not ok for anyone to question his or thier lectures? A more then valid reason that the fairness doctrine needs to be defeated.
If as Churchill claims that there needs to be a free and open discussion on University grounds. Then both sides must have accss to the gray matter of the mush brains attending. You cannot form a reliable and informed opinion on a topic if you are not allowed to hear the opposite side of the argument.
In a lecture tuesday October 2nd the mush brains in Boulder, good ol Ward has informed students that he will began what he told students would become a series of classes held at the school despite being fired from his position in July.
Eliciting applause and handshakes from the majority of the 30 (my what a big crowd, phhht) or so CU students and area residents who came to hear Churchills lecture, which he titled “ReVisioning American History: (appropriate title considering his spin and lack of truth presented) Colonization, Genocide and Formation of the U.S. Settler State.”
Churchill, who did not allow the Camera to attend the class, said the group would come up with various topics to discuss. (no cameras? I wonder why. Not wanting anyone to be able to question his questionable facts perhaps).
“I’ve been invited by people who are concerned with content of the mind,” Churchill said.
Content of the mind? Now does this elicit questioning or not? What content is he trying to credit? Facts he has distorted and twisted in his mind to be able to support his "revisioned" history.
Supposedly big supporters of the 1st Amendment, two organisers useing thug tactics, refused several other C.U. students from listening or even entering the event to listen to Churchill. Claiming that those turned away were agitators and not needed in this forum.
So it is ok for Ward and his followers to go to other events and possibly dissrupt and distort these events and speakers. However it is not ok for anyone to question his or thier lectures? A more then valid reason that the fairness doctrine needs to be defeated.
If as Churchill claims that there needs to be a free and open discussion on University grounds. Then both sides must have accss to the gray matter of the mush brains attending. You cannot form a reliable and informed opinion on a topic if you are not allowed to hear the opposite side of the argument.
