Obama showing his dislike for Israel
Despite the spin by the drive by media, the lies that come out of President Obama's mouth , and the lefts insistence that they support Israel. The facts of the matter display the truth better then any thing else. Now people need to look at what is happening.
Does anyone recall a Samantha Powers. She is proud of the following quote of hers:
"alienat[e] a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing...billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel's military, but actually investing in the state of Palestine."
She also subscribes to the far out notion that the war in Iraq was done at the request of Israel.
From the American thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/samantha_power_and_obamas_fore_1.html
Power also advocates that America send armed military forces, "a mammoth protection force" and an "external intervention", to impose a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. This directly contradicts her criticism of the invasion and "occupation" of Iraq and her call for the removal of American forces from that nation. On the one hand, Power abhors American efforts to remake an Arab nation, but takes the contrary view when it comes to inserting American forces in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in order to impose a settlement. These troops, if sent, would be seen as occupiers and be sitting targets for Arab extremists. The colonial image of America and charges of imperial overstretch would echo throughout the Arab world.
As Noah Pollak wrote in the New York Times a while back:
"Martin Kramer points us to an interesting quote from the 2003 book Ethnic Violence and Justice, in which Samantha Power, one of Barack Obama's foreign policy advisers, asks a question of David Rohde, a reporter who covered the intifada for the New York Times. The quote is as follows:
Samantha Power: I have a question for David about working for the New York Times. I was struck by a headline that accompanied a news story on the publication of the Human Rights Watch report. The headline was, I believe: "Human Rights Report Finds Massacre Did Not Occur in Jenin." The second paragraph said, "Oh, but lots of war crimes did." Why wouldn't they make the war crimes the headline and the non-massacre the second paragraph?
The misrepresented article by Powers is: "MIDEAST TURMOIL: INQUIRY; Rights Group Doubts Mass Deaths in Jenin, but Sees Signs of War Crimes." go read it yourself, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9402E2D81031F930A35756C0A9649C8B63
Samantha Powers is just yet another in a growing list of radicals that are being placed into our government. A government that is being run by extremists and racists. Where is the liberal tolerance crowds outrage at this? It is nowhere to be found. Why, because deep down the tolerance crowd is not tolerant at all but full of hatred. Hatred that is equivalent to that of the Islamic world that cries they are peaceful yet goes on murder sprees.
Does anyone recall a Samantha Powers. She is proud of the following quote of hers:
"alienat[e] a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing...billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel's military, but actually investing in the state of Palestine."
She also subscribes to the far out notion that the war in Iraq was done at the request of Israel.
From the American thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/samantha_power_and_obamas_fore_1.html
Power also advocates that America send armed military forces, "a mammoth protection force" and an "external intervention", to impose a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. This directly contradicts her criticism of the invasion and "occupation" of Iraq and her call for the removal of American forces from that nation. On the one hand, Power abhors American efforts to remake an Arab nation, but takes the contrary view when it comes to inserting American forces in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in order to impose a settlement. These troops, if sent, would be seen as occupiers and be sitting targets for Arab extremists. The colonial image of America and charges of imperial overstretch would echo throughout the Arab world.
As Noah Pollak wrote in the New York Times a while back:
"Martin Kramer points us to an interesting quote from the 2003 book Ethnic Violence and Justice, in which Samantha Power, one of Barack Obama's foreign policy advisers, asks a question of David Rohde, a reporter who covered the intifada for the New York Times. The quote is as follows:
Samantha Power: I have a question for David about working for the New York Times. I was struck by a headline that accompanied a news story on the publication of the Human Rights Watch report. The headline was, I believe: "Human Rights Report Finds Massacre Did Not Occur in Jenin." The second paragraph said, "Oh, but lots of war crimes did." Why wouldn't they make the war crimes the headline and the non-massacre the second paragraph?
The misrepresented article by Powers is: "MIDEAST TURMOIL: INQUIRY; Rights Group Doubts Mass Deaths in Jenin, but Sees Signs of War Crimes." go read it yourself, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9402E2D81031F930A35756C0A9649C8B63
Samantha Powers is just yet another in a growing list of radicals that are being placed into our government. A government that is being run by extremists and racists. Where is the liberal tolerance crowds outrage at this? It is nowhere to be found. Why, because deep down the tolerance crowd is not tolerant at all but full of hatred. Hatred that is equivalent to that of the Islamic world that cries they are peaceful yet goes on murder sprees.
