We all know that President Obama has a creditability issue. During his campaign and the vetting process of the majority of his cabinet and administration. He threw many under the bus , then backed up and ran over them a second time.

Now he is feeling the heat from his poor policy decisions. So what does he do? He plays the blame game. Not being man enough to have even a dialog with any conservative on any issue that has relevance to today's economy and world situations. Barrack Obama is distancing himself from the economic problems he is only making worse.

In his weekly press call he disputes that anything is his fault.

"I did think it might be useful to point out that it wasn’t under me that we started buying a bunch of shares of banks. It wasn’t on my watch. And it wasn’t on my watch that we passed a massive new entitlement -– the prescription drug plan -- without a source of funding. And so I think it’s important just to note when you start hearing folks throw these words around that we’ve actually been operating in a way that has been entirely consistent with free-market principles and that some of the same folks who are throwing the word 'socialist' around can’t say the same."

So when the New York Times reporter asked whose watch it did happen on, Obama had this to say.

"Well, I just think it’s clear by the time we got here, there already had been an enormous infusion of taxpayer money into the financial system. And the thing I constantly try to emphasize to people if that coming in, the market was doing fine, nobody would be happier than me to stay out of it. I have more than enough to do without having to worry the financial system. The fact that we’ve had to take these extraordinary measures and intervene is not an indication of my ideological preference, but an indication of the degree to which lax regulation and extravagant risk taking has precipitated a crisis."

Then when confronted with the Socialist question of are you or aren't you. His response tried to dodge the facts. A simple yes would have sufficed.

"You know, let’s take a look at the budget – the answer would be no."

Yet anyone who does look at the budget would conclude differently on this.

"Let’s just take a look at what we’ve done.If you look on the revenue side what we’re proposing, what we’re looking at is essentially to go back to the tax rates that existed during the 1990s when, as I recall, rich people were doing very well. In fact everybody was doing very well. . . . We said that we’d give a tax cut to 95 percent of working Americans. That’s exactly what we have done."

Well a simple examination of the truth and the facts would show that. I have to say it. Obama is lieing. His proposals are higher taxes, a redistribution of wealth. Taking and punishing achievement and rewarding laziness and slackers. The return of higher tax rates that DID exist in the 1990 is a move to socialism not freedom from government oppression.

The return of the welfare state that a Conservative legislature forced President Clinton to reduce is the reward for those who work. The theft of their hard earned monies to pay those who lack initiative.

Yep , Obama is not man enough to stand up and admit who he is or take responsibility for his actions.