I can not believe what I just read. A piece of Americana is lost do to political correctness and progressive thinking. How can D.C. comics actually do this to my childhood and opthers who grew up with their hero's one way then change them a 180 degree turn for some nonexisitant main stream that does not exisit except in radical circles.

Batwoman hero returns as lesbian
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5030518.stm

Batwoman's new look has been designed by artist Alex Ross
Comic book heroine Batwoman is to make a comeback as a "lipstick lesbian" who moonlights as a crime fighter, a DC Comics spokesman has confirmed.
Batwoman - real name Kathy Kane - will appear in 52, a year-long DC Comics publication that began this month.

In her latest incarnation, she is a rich socialite who has a romantic history with another 52 character, ex-police detective Renee Montoya.

52 will be published in the UK as a graphic novel by Titan Books in 2007.

The series is set in a world in which established superheroes like Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman no longer play a part.

Reinvention

The new-look Batwoman is just one of a wave of ethnically and sexually diverse characters entering the DC Comics universe.

Others include Mexican teenager Blue Beetle - who replaces the character's previous white incarnation - and the Great Ten, a government-sponsored team of Chinese superheroes.

Regular characters Firestorm and The Atom, meanwhile, have been reinvented as black and Asian heroes respectively.

The characters are part of a wider effort to broaden the make-up of comic-book creations in line with society as a whole.

Batwoman, who first appeared in July 1956, has not been seen since September 1979 when she was killed by the League of Assassins and the Bronze Tiger.


I thought it was bad enough when the guardians banished Hal Jordan to the far end of the known universe and brought in this usurper ( I dont care if he is black or not, he just isn't the caretaker of garden city you know).

Why the big push to change all the hero's to minorities. What happened to the Black Panther ... harlem's answer to Batman and daredevil. Iron Fist .... karate expert and bad guy butt kicker.

Whats next Superman becomes Arab.

The following words are the tail end of President Reagans speech given at Normandy 40 years after D-day. The are powerful and poingent. We should take to heart what is said and remember well.

(for full transcript go to following address)

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/rreaganddayaddress.html

We in America have learned bitter lessons from two world wars. It is better to be here ready to protect the peace, than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent. But we try always to be prepared for peace, prepared to deter aggression, prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms, and yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever.

It's fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II. Twenty million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.

We will pray forever that someday that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.

We're bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We're bound by reality. The strength of America's allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe's democracies. We were with you then; we're with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.

Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."

Strengthened by their courage and heartened by their value [valor] and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.

Thank you very much, and God bless you all.

[ INSPIREING!!!!!!!!!]

WOW!! What a movie, and it was just that a movie. A movie based upon a novel. Novel which is short for novelty, meaning entertainment. This is exactly what this movie was. Entertainment at a leval hollywood seems to fall so short of as of late.

Now before all you good catholics get your knickers in a twist, this is only a movie. I do not see where you are so insulted at this theory and not when hollywood makes Jesus gay.

The story is very intrigueing and full of twists and turns, (I have to go read the book now). Several plots within a plot. This is what makes movies entertaining. The acting was very good. All the critisism of Tom Hanks in my opinion is unwarrented as he plays a role much different from past roles. Very well done too.

Many inacuracies do exisits in this story making it not a documentary, or factual in any way. The templers history for one, not close to the truth in their ending. However if you are looking for some good family entertainment and discussion then this is a MUST see for the whole family.

Ron Howard proves himself again as a top notch director.

It is Memorial Day weekend. A weekend most Americans view as the start of the summer vacation season. What is Memorial Day and why should we at least take a moment to remember?

Memorial Day, originally called Decoration Day, is a day of remembrance for those who have died in our nation's service. There is evidence that organized women's groups in the South were decorating graves before the end of the Civil War: a hymn published in 1867, "Kneel Where Our Loves are Sleeping" by Nella L. Sweet carried the dedication "To The Ladies of the South who are Decorating the Graves of the Confederate Dead".While Waterloo N.Y. was officially declared the birthplace of Memorial Day by President Lyndon Johnson in May 1966, it's difficult to prove conclusively the origins of the day. It is more likely that it had many separate beginnings. It is not important who was the very first, what is important is that Memorial Day was established. Memorial Day is not about division. It is about reconciliation; it is about coming together to honor those who gave their all.

Memorial Day was officially proclaimed on 5 May 1868 by General John Logan, national commander of the Grand Army of the Republic, in his General Order No. 11, and was first observed on 30 May 1868, when flowers were placed on the graves of Union and Confederate soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery. The first state to officially recognize the holiday was New York in 1873. By 1890 it was recognized by all of the northern states. The South refused to acknowledge the day, honoring their dead on separate days until after World War I (when the holiday changed from honoring just those who died fighting in the Civil War to honoring Americans who died fighting in any war). It is now celebrated in almost every State on the last Monday in May (passed by Congress with the National Holiday Act of 1971 (P.L. 90 - 363) to ensure a three day weekend for Federal holidays), though several southern states have an additional separate day for honoring the Confederate war dead: January 19 in Texas, April 26 in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi; May 10 in South Carolina; and June 3 (Jefferson Davis' birthday) in Louisiana and Tennessee.

In 1915, inspired by the poem "In Flanders Fields," Moina Michael replied with her own poem:



We cherish too, the Poppy red
That grows on fields where valor led,
It seems to signal to the skies
That blood of heroes never dies.


She then conceived of an idea to wear red poppies on Memorial day in honor of those who died serving the nation during war. She was the first to wear one, and sold poppies to her friends and co-workers with the money going to benefit servicemen in need. Later a Madam Guerin from France was visiting the United States and learned of this new custom started by Ms.Michael and when she returned to France, made artificial red poppies to raise money for war orphaned children and widowed women. This tradition spread to other countries. In 1921, the Franco-American Children's League sold poppies nationally to benefit war orphans of France and Belgium. The League disbanded a year later and Madam Guerin approached the VFW for help. Shortly before Memorial Day in 1922 the VFW became the first veterans' organization to nationally sell poppies.

Traditional observance of Memorial day has diminished over the years. Many Americans nowadays have forgotten the meaning and traditions of Memorial Day. At many cemeteries, the graves of the fallen are increasingly ignored, neglected. Most people no longer remember the proper flag etiquette for the day. While there are towns and cities that still hold Memorial Day parades, many have not held a parade in decades. Some people think the day is for honoring any and all dead, and not just those fallen in service to our country. With antiwar protestors taking out their political views on those who have served, not understanding that the military right or wrong are only following orders set forth by their commander and chief. These misguided people shame what is a fine tradition.

There are a few notable exceptions. Since the late 50's on the Thursday before Memorial Day, the 1,200 soldiers of the 3d U.S. Infantry place small American flags at each of the more than 260,000 gravestones at Arlington National Cemetery. They then patrol 24 hours a day during the weekend to ensure that each flag remains standing. In 1951, the Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts of St. Louis began placing flags on the 150,000 graves at Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery as an annual Good Turn, a practice that continues to this day. More recently, beginning in 1998, on the Saturday before the observed day for Memorial Day, the Boys Scouts and Girl Scouts place a candle at each of approximately 15,300 grave sites of soldiers buried at Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park on Marye's Heights (the Luminaria Program). And in 2004, Washington D.C. held its first Memorial Day parade in over 60 years. Way too long of a time to pay respect for those who served and gave their all.

To help re-educate and remind Americans of the true meaning of Memorial Day, the "National Moment of Remembrance" resolution was passed on Dec 2000 which asks that at 3 p.m. local time, for all Americans "To voluntarily and informally observe in their own way a Moment of remembrance and respect, pausing from whatever they are doing for a moment of silence or listening to 'Taps."

The Moment of Remembrance is a step in the right direction to returning the meaning back to the day. What is needed is a full return to the original day of observance. Set aside one day out of the year for the nation to get together to remember, reflect and honor those who have given their all in service to their country.

But what may be needed to return the solemn, and even sacred, spirit back to Memorial Day is for a return to its traditional day of observance. Many feel that when Congress made the day into a three-day weekend in with the National Holiday Act of 1971, it made it all the easier for people to be distracted from the spirit and meaning of the day. As the VFW stated in its 2002 Memorial Day address: "Changing the date merely to create three-day weekends has undermined the very meaning of the day. No doubt, this has contributed greatly to the general public's nonchalant observance of Memorial Day."

Unfortunately progressive thinking enlightened thinkers are forceing a forgetfulness to the meaning of this and another important holiday that pays respect to those who serve and have served. Several school districts in this country have adopted the policy of not having a day off (when a teacher or thier union opts for work instead of another day off ALL RED FLAGS should be sent up) that has school children attend class that day instead. Veterans day has been determined to be only a footnote during a political science class. Does this mean Memorial day will be next?

On January 19, 1999 Senator Inouye introduced bill S 189 to the Senate which proposes to restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day back to May 30th instead of "the last Monday in May". On April 19, 1999 Representative Gibbons introduced the bill to the House (H.R. 1474). The bills were referred the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Government Reform.

Sign the Petition
in support of bill S 189
To date, there has been no further developments on the bill. Please write your Representative and your Senators, urging them to support these bills.

As more and more evidance, ahh so called evidance is released from the prosecution to the defense we find more holes then a religiouse piece of swiss cheese in the case. (referance to all the holes in a slice ahkmed)

Several interesting e-mail responses have come in. As is appearing that Nifiong the prosecuter used this case to help him win reelection Joseph Gutheinz makes this comparrison.

Comparing LAX case to that of Scottsboro Nine


I am a college instructor who teaches criminal justice and a criminal defense attorney. In my entire career I have never seen such a bizarre and unfair case as the one against three Duke lacrosse players.

I teach a class about a similar case in American history, the Scottsboro Nine. In March 1931, a group of nine black teen-agers was charged with rape on incredibly flimsy evidence in Scottsboro, Ala. The nine were originally charged with the rape of two white women. Even after one woman testified that she lied about the rape, the nine teens continued to face rape charges and the threat of death by execution.

In the Scottsboro case, the two women were part-time prostitutes, but that didn't matter, nor did it matter that at least one of the boys was known to be physically unable to have sex, and two of the boys were only 13. Like Durham, the real issue was race.

In Scottsboro, nine young men were wrongly charged and condemned because they were black, and today the Duke lacrosse players have, in my opinion, been wrongly charged and condemned because they are white and the alleged victim is black.

The one constant with respect to the two cases is racism. I often ask my students if it possible for blacks to discriminate against whites in the same type of mindless ignorance as the KKK or the way the mob went after the Scottsboro Nine. The answer I receive is yes, and my students point to Durham as proof.


JOSEPH R. GUTHEINZ JR



I THANK JOSEPH FOR THIS OBSERVATION AND THE ABOVE IS HIS E-MAIL TO ME. I APPRECIATE THESE TYPE OF RESPONSES TO ALL MY PONDERING AND OPINIONS. IT PROVOKES THOUGHT AND IS RATIONAL IN FORM. WITHOUT NAME CALLING OR ACUSATIONS. AGAIN THANKYOU JOSEPH.

I blogged and asked the question what our elected officials were hiding or afraid of. By allowing the FBI to execute their search warrents into congressional offices, legislatures are throwing hissy fits. Now ABC is reporting another investigation.

ABC News's Blotter blog reports:

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert, is under investigation by the FBI, which is seeking to determine his role in an ongoing public corruption probe into members of Congress, ABC News has learned from senior U.S. law enforcement officials.
Federal officials say the information implicating Hastert was developed from convicted lobbyists who are now cooperating with the government.


However the department of Justice issued the current statement:

Statement from the department of Justice
WASHINGTON, D.C.

"Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department."


So we have hint of a possible investigation to the squeeky wheel on the search of Jeffersons office. This is why we as voters need to put it to these pompus jackasses in Washington ..... THEY ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW.

More outrage on fox and friends this morning as Lawyers cry foul to being investigated. You want to talk about spinning and forming grey lines to abuseing the Constitution. Here it is folks. Congress wants to reserve the right to when , who , and how they can be investigated for wrong doings.

The debate clause prevents first admendment rights from being violated by one branch of the government from another. It does not prevent the investigation and arrest of officials who break the law.

By Congress getting bent out of shape over a LEGAL act should raise all sorts of red flags to the voters. lawyers are the ones in office and it is lawyers who are being investigated. Is it not lawyers who know the loop holes in the law?

When the FBI went to the third branch of government to get a warrent, this indicates that there is no overiding vindictive act. What this shows is cooperation as it should be between these branches and an act of cleaning and keeping the rule of law as it should be.

If Congress can hide behind a grey line in the debate clause then the executive branch should be allowed to hide behind the first admendment on policy while the judicial branch can twist and abuse the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Civics classes must be made mandatory in High Schools again and qualified teachers hired to teach how this government is supposed to and designed to work. Only this way can the voter make an educated decision in electing their represenatives and stop this abuse of the Constitution.

If Congress is allowed to investigate, prosecute, and sentance its own members, then no one will be held to the letter of the law. Simplified the Legislature writes the law, the Executive branch signs it, and the Judicial branch determines its Constitutionality.

Congress does not have the right or the authority to be held as judge , jury , and executioner of the law.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.),raised concerns that the FBI’s unannounced seizure of congressional documents during a raid of Jefferson’s Rayburn office Saturday night violated the separation of powers between the two branches of government as they are defined by the Constitution. But why is he so concearned. As a matter of fact why are so many in congress upset?

Republican objections are independent of any facts in the corruption probe against Jefferson. Their complaints pertain solely to constitutional questions about the raid itself.

The issue is not clear-cut for both parties. Republicans have repeatedly cited the Jefferson probe as an example of Democratic malfeasance in the face of charges about their own “culture of corruption.” On the Democratic side of the aisle, the investigation itself undermines the effectiveness of their efforts to tar Republicans with the corruption issue.


Is this the real reason they are upset. At the possibility of being publicly exposed on a raid by the FBI. Instead of worring about who and how their fellow members in congress are betraying their constituants. The concern is on the investigation and seizure of office documents over a weekend.

The Jefferson raid is the most recent flare-up between Congress and the White House. In a statement distributed Monday night, Hastert made it clear that he was not given a heads-up about the FBI’s raid on Jefferson’s office.

In the Speaker’s lengthy statement, Hastert complained that the seizure of legislative papers, no matter how innocuous, was a violation of the “the principles of Separation of Powers, the independence of the Legislative Branch, and the protections afforded by the Speech and Debate clause of the Constitution.”

Now this is what bothers the most out of me. See the arrogance being demonstrated by Hastert. He is upset at the seizure of papers, papers that may be evidance in an investigation to wrong doing by an elected official. Claiming this is a violation of the seperations between Legislature and Executive powers. How is the execution of a search warrent a violation? Oh wait is it because it was issued against an elected official and instead of kowtowing to political correctness it was executed and turned up evidance in the hollowed halls of Congress?

Democrats were supportive of Hastert’s criticism and appear to support the Speaker in pursuing further action.

“No member of Congress is above the law,” House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) told reporters yesterday. “I am concerned about the unprecedented exercising of authority over a separate branch of government and the execution of a search warrant without any communication with the leadership of this House.”

Hoyer said he agrees with Hastert’s concerns and was less than defensive of Jefferson.

“The institution has a right to protect itself against the executive branch going into our offices and violating what is the Speech and Debate Clause that essentially says, ‘That’s none of your business, executive branch,’” Hoyer said.

So the real issue again is that elected officials are thinking that the are above the law by hiding behind the debate clause. In their minds anything in their offices are exempt from search then. So hide all your bribe monies and paper trails in your offices because unless you are forwarned. This just stinks to high heaven. The precedent that they want to set is absurd. If congress has to be warned and alerted that their illegal activities are being investigated then all investigations have to go public and all who are breaking the law have to be warned before the police can begin to look into their activities.

Think about this. What Hastert and his fellow cronies on both sides of the isle are saying is that we are above the law. Pure and simple arrogance and why it is so important to clean house of all these bums. We as the citizens in this country are the true power and ruling authority of this nation. No man is above the law or below it. All are equal in justice. If elected officials are allowed to abuse thier offices and hide under a clause that is getting fuzzier by the minute then we are no longer a republic or a democracy.

What else are they hiding and trying to cover up? In what other ways have they sold this country and its citizens out. What are they afraid of? More charges of bribery and espinoge perhaps.

Surge of volunteers expected to help illegal immigrants cross desert

http://www.kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=4930696

A surge in the number of volunteers fanning out across Arizona's southern deserts to aid illegal immigrants is expected this summer.

The increase comes despite the ongoing prosecution of two volunteers arrested last summer on federal charges they intentionally conspired to transport illegal entrants, leaders of illegal immigrant aid groups said.

Shanti A. Sellz and Daniel M. Strauss, both 24, were arrested as they drove illegal entrants to a clinic on July 9 and face trial in October.

Leaders of two faith-based groups, No More Deaths and Samaritan Patrol, say they've signed up hundreds of volunteers to deliver food, water and medical aid to migrants illegally walking into the country from Mexico. No More Deaths alone has 500 registered volunteers, up from 300 last summer.

A third group, Humane Borders, puts water tanks in areas frequented by illegal migrants.

The groups are trying to reach an agreement with the U.S. Border Patrol spelling out legal ways they can provide humanitarian aid to illegal migrants.

DESPITE THE NOBILITY OF THESE MISGUIDED DOGOODERS, THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW. IF THEY ARE SO EAGER TO HELP THESE PEOPLE THEN WHY ARE THE ENCOURASGEING THEM TO DO SOMETHING STUPID. YOU DON'T HAVE TO WALK THROUGH THE DESERT TO GET TO AN AMERICAN CITY. ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS CROSS AT A PORT OF ENTRY SAY THEY ARE ON A DAY TRIP VISIT THEN DISSAPEAR INTO THIS NATION.

INSTEAD THEY WANT TO CONTIUNUE TO ENCOURAGE THESE ILEGALS TO TRUDGE INTO THE DESERT AND FACE THE CLIMATE AND CONDITIONS. NOT TOO SMART IF YOU ASK ME.

I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR ALL THESE DOGOODERS ...... ARE YOU GOING TO PAY FOR ALL THESE NEW PEOPLE'S MEDICAL, CAR INSURANCE, FICA TAXES? SO WHEN IT COMES TIME TO COLLECT ON THE BILL WILL YOU BE THERE TO HELP PAY OR ARE YOU GOING TO BE PREDICTABLE AND PASS THE BUCK TO THOSE WHO OBEY THE LAW.

Why are we still giving Mexico money to shore up their government and economy when they are not useing the money for that purpose. Those who come across the boarder whether legal or ilegal mexico is recieving billions of dollars in wire transfers.

Last year, Mexico received a record $20 billion in remittances from migrant workers. That is equal to Mexico's 2004 income from oil exports and dwarfing tourism revenue.

Arriving in small monthly transfers of $100 and $200, remittances have formed a vast river of "migra-dollars" that now exceeds lending by multilateral development agencies and foreign direct investment combined, according to the Inter-American Development Bank.

The money Mexican migrants send home almost equals the U.S. foreign aid budget for the entire world, said Arturo Valenzuela, director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Georgetown University and former head of Inter-American Affairs at the National Security Council during the Clinton administration.

Migration has caused significant social disruption in Mexico, though research is scant, said B. Lindsay Lowell, director of policy studies at the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University.

"We do know that it can break up families, and has done so in many traditional sending areas," he said. "The husband comes to the United States and stays for many years. His wife is on her own with the children. In some cases, the couple comes to the United States and leaves their children behind with relatives."

The migration is driven in part, experts say, by the large income differentials between the two nations. A rural Latin American migrant may earn 10 times in the United States what he or she can earn at home. Yet was not NAFTA supposed to change all this?

NAFTA was to bring new jobs, buisnesses and oppertunities to Mexico. However Mexico itself refuses to allow NAFTA to work by passing laws that still support a Constitution that is inherently biased against the companies and people who would aid in bringing Mexico out of the third world its government thives in.

Most illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America have not completed high school, although education levels are rising. Harvard economist George Borjas found that in 2000, 63 percent of Mexican immigrants had not finished high school.

New immigrants are much more broadly dispersed than previous waves. A lower percentage are going to the traditional magnet states such as California and New York. The fastest-growing destinations for new arrivals, according to demographer William Frey of the Brookings Institution, are North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Iowa and Nebraska.

This geographic dispersal may account in part for rising public discontent over immigration, many believe. Migrant workers have also shifted from the fields to the cities, working in hotels, restaurants and construction, where they are more visible to the public.

Mexico is aging too, which will eventually cause migration to ebb. Its population trails the U.S. age profile by 30 years. By then, demographers expect Mexico may be importing labor. So is this why bleeding hearts in Washington are selling out our already short social security system? A system in which will be unable to pay the supplementary income for retirement it was designed to do.

With the recent granting of social security benifits to ilegals this shortfall will come much sooner then later. By the useing of false social security numbers that are stolen identities of LEGAL Citizens who is to determine who has paid their 40 quarter/ 10 years of contributions.

While migration has long served as a safety valve for Mexico, the current wave may also be hindering the political and economic reforms that most agree are needed -- in education, taxes, energy, agriculture and law, where systemic corruption is a serious barrier to growth.

Unfortunatelty this corruption is deep seated in Mexico's government and they line their pockets while oppressing their own people. This is a huge factor in the move northward by these "migrants".

"The good news is that a million Mexicans were on the street recently demanding good jobs and good government and justice," Roger Noriega, former assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs, told a recent panel at the American Enterprise Institute. "The bad news is they were marching in someone else's country. Every day, thousands of Mexico's most industrious people leave their families behind ... leading many to wonder why Mexico's political class is not capable of creating economic opportunity for its citizens in a land rich in mineral wealth, hydrocarbons, agricultural potential and human capital."

Well it is easier to sit back in their air condition offices , take extravagant vacations, and pocket monies from the populance rather then develope a nation.

For all you do gooders who think America is the root of all evil and full of racists and bigots, maybe you need to look a little further south. Oh Hell open your eyes and take a look at Mexico and what they are doing when it comes to your "migrant workers" commonly known as ILEGAL ALIENS.

Mexico Works to Bar Non-Natives From Jobs

By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer

MEXICO CITY - If Arnold Schwarzenegger had migrated to Mexico instead of the United States, he couldn't be a governor. If Argentina native Sergio Villanueva, firefighter hero of the Sept. 11 attacks, had moved to Tecate instead of New York, he wouldn't have been allowed on the force.

Even as Mexico presses the United States to grant unrestricted citizenship to millions of undocumented Mexican migrants, its officials at times calling U.S. policies "xenophobic," Mexico places daunting limitations on anyone born outside its territory.

In the United States, only two posts — the presidency and vice presidency — are reserved for the native born.

In Mexico, non-natives are banned from those and thousands of other jobs, even if they are legal, naturalized citizens.

Foreign-born Mexicans can't hold seats in either house of the congress. They're also banned from state legislatures, the Supreme Court and all governorships. Many states ban foreign-born Mexicans from spots on town councils. And Mexico's Constitution reserves almost all federal posts, and any position in the military and merchant marine, for "native-born Mexicans."

Recently the Mexican government has gone even further. Since at least 2003, it has encouraged cities to ban non-natives from such local jobs as firefighters, police and judges.

Mexico's Interior Department — which recommended the bans as part of "model" city statutes it distributed to local officials — could cite no basis for extending the bans to local posts.

After being contacted by The Associated Press about the issue, officials changed the wording in two statutes to delete the "native-born" requirements, although they said the modifications had nothing to do with AP's inquiries.

"These statutes have been under review for some time, and they have, or are about to be, changed," said an Interior Department official, who was not authorized to be quoted by name.

But because the "model" statues are fill-in-the-blanks guides for framing local legislation, many cities across Mexico have already enacted such bans. They have done so even though foreigners constitute a tiny percentage of the population and pose little threat to Mexico's job market.

The foreign-born make up just 0.5 percent of Mexico's 105 million people, compared with about 13 percent in the United States, which has a total population of 299 million. Mexico grants citizenship to about 3,000 people a year, compared to the U.S. average of almost a half million.

"There is a need for a little more openness, both at the policy level and in business affairs," said David Kim, president of the Mexico-Korea Association, which represents the estimated 20,000 South Koreans in Mexico, many of them naturalized citizens.

"The immigration laws are very difficult ... and they put obstacles in the way that make it more difficult to compete," Kim said, although most foreigners don't come to Mexico seeking government posts.

J. Michael Waller, of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, was more blunt. "If American policy-makers are looking for legal models on which to base new laws restricting immigration and expelling foreign lawbreakers, they have a handy guide: the Mexican constitution," he said in a recent article on immigration.

Some Mexicans agree their country needs to change.

"This country needs to be more open," said Francisco Hidalgo, a 50-year-old video producer. "In part to modernize itself, and in part because of the contribution these (foreign-born) people could make."

Others express a more common view, a distrust of foreigners that academics say is rooted in Mexico's history of foreign invasions and the loss of territory in the 1847-48 Mexican-American War.

Speaking of the hundreds of thousands of Central Americans who enter Mexico each year, chauffeur Arnulfo Hernandez, 57, said: "The ones who want to reach the United States, we should send them up there. But the ones who want to stay here, it's usually for bad reasons, because they want to steal or do drugs."

Some say progress is being made. Mexico's president no longer is required to be at least a second-generation native-born. That law was changed in 1999 to clear the way for candidates who have one foreign-born parent, like President Vicente Fox, whose mother is from Spain.

But the pace of change is slow. The state of Baja California still requires candidates for the state legislature to prove both their parents were native born.


HOW ABOUT THEM CRACKERS EH OPEN BOARDER CROWD. MEXICO IS DEMANDING ITS CITIZENS BE GIVEN RIGHTS HERE IN AMERICA YET THEY DENY THE SAME RIGHTS TO THOSE WHO LOOK TO MEXICO FOR A BETTER WAY OF LIFE. FOR MEXICO IT IS A ONE WAY STREET. MEXICANS FIRST THE REST NEVER. MAKING LAWS AND HAVING A CONSTITUTION THAT DENIES FORIEGNERS EQUALITY UNDER MEXICAN LAW.

NOW THAT YOU BLEEDING HEART OPEN BOARDER PEOPLE ARE GETTING YOUR WAY AND FORCEING AMERICAN LEGAL CITIZENS TO TAKE A BACK SEAT TO FELONS (THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN USEING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO LIVE AND WORK IN AMERICA) HOW ABOUT TAKING YOUR WHININNING TO MEXICO AND REFORM THEIR OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT THAT LOOKS TO BE RATHER BIGOTED!!!!!!!

Director John Mitchell or sleezey pornographic pusher? Now this is the question that should be asked about his new movie SHORTBUS. A movie that pushes live sex to its viewing audiance. Something you only see in pornos. This rated r movie is being heralded by critics as a trip into American life that should be celebrated and not humiliated.

Director John Mitchell's claim of sex is a natural thing is not argumented. That in itself is a stupid statement on his part. As any biology student learns in day one. However he puts an antiBush spin to sex.

In an amazing diatribe of leftist paranoia sex is now something the current administration is against.

"It's a little bit of a cri de coeur to us, a little bit of a call to arms" against the prevailing conservatism, he told a media conference, adding that this country was living in "the era of Bush, which is about clamping down, being scared."

The 43-year-old, whose previous work was "Hedwig and the Angry Inch," about a transsexual rock singer, said the film was his own small act of defiance against Bush.

"If you can't do elections you might as well do erections," he said.

See how it is spun and goes back to the myth of a stolen Florida election. That the conservative movement in this country wants to stiffle even sex.

One scene likely to create controversy in the United States and some other countries shows a gay threesome in which one participant joyfully bellows "The Star Spangled Banner."

Although the first half of the film is filled with sex, including orgies and masturbation, the act itself is not meant to be erotic but rather to challenge the audience and make it confront issues such as loneliness, the illusion of self-sufficiency and other seemingly unrelated problems, Mitchell said.

Self dilusion by John Mitchell into claiming his form of smutt is to tackle problems we face as a society, with leftist logic of looseing rights and blamming President Bush for this does not make for entertainment.

"Sex is not that interesting unless it's put into an artistic context, or you're having it yourself," Mitchell said.

The opening sequence prepares audiences for what is to come, with three different sex scenes.

One features a young man performing oral sex on himself in front of a camera, another a young man masturbating as he is whipped by a dominatrix and the third a couple having acrobatic sex in their apartment.

None of these scenes sound artistic to me. They do sound a little perverted and not really worth watching. I suppose for some though this will be a great movie revealing thier own sexual habits.

The movie SHORTBUS falls into the same catogory as all porn. To some it is artistic and entertaining. To others it touches topics that are not polight in pub lic circles. Then to the rest it is smutt.

To me it is just another wannabe director with leftist view trying to take a jab at America.

Shortbus is a statement about cinema, but it is also a commentary on the United States which Mitchell said viewed sex too negatively.

"I really believe our country specifically needs to take a look at that stuff. You crush something, it pops up somewhere else, it comes back to haunt you.

This is why a threesome of gay men with one singing the national Anthem is included.

JUST MORE SMUTT FROM THE ENTERTAINMENT WORLD WHO IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH NEW IDEAS.

Well, some cheer and some jeered. Boos and applause sounded around the nation in ball parks as the news of Barry Bonds hitting number 714 was announced.

So is this a good this a good thing or a bad thing. Many would say it has tainted baseball forever. That unless an asterik is placed next to Bonds name the record is not right. Claims of illegal steroid use and possible other drugs to achieve this phenominal record run rampent. A book has even been writen nameing names and outlinning how steroids are abused in proffesional baseball.

Do we stand up and congratulate this, or do we sneer and hurrumph it? Personally I ignore it as I find baseball is no longer a sport I care to watch. Millionares who complain about not getting enough money to stand around and scratch themselves on national t.v. They lost my support in thier last strike.

I just think that this latest chapter in baseballs much tainted history is worth noteing. Have an asterik or no asterik, hitting 714 home runs is an achievment. Billy Wagner , closer for the mets sums it up as it stands:
"They should celebrate in baseball. There's no guilty verdict yet."

What is wrong with our elected officials? As a country we are faceing several crippeling issues. Budget shortcomes, and an energy shortage.

So what does our elected officials in Washington do. They vote to increase spending on a social security system that is going broke. As it stands now there ios more money going out then coming in. Payments being made to those who have not paid in dime one or who have not paid in their full 40 quarters/ 10 years of contributions.

A compromise immigration bill pending right now in the U.S. Senate (sponsored by Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Mel Martinez (R-FL)) comes at a time when our nation is facing an enormous crisis on the entitlements front. A recent report moved the year in which Social Security will go broke from 2041 to 2040. Congress cannot afford to keep the promise of Social Security to its own citizens, let alone illegal workers.

Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) has offered an amendment to the pending Senate immigration bill that would reverse this law to ensure that law-breakers are not rewarded for their past work at the expense of immigrants who have waited in line and American citizens.

SA 3985, known as the Ensign admendment was defeated in a vote. Here we have an actual proposal that makes sense. Stateing that hey we are not going to count any money sent in to the S.S.A under FALSE and STOLEN numbers. If you want credit for your social security benifits we will start you at day one and begin to count the contributions.

Instead of useing a common sense approach our elected numbskulls want to continue their lack of fiscal responsibility and let ILEGALS (WHO WILL BE GIVEN AMNESTY) monies from the welfare/social programs when many have not payed into it.

This is just taxation and redistribution of wealth by socialist!!!!!

Now the next VERY QUESTIONABLE thing these bozos did was to vote down relief for the soaring fuel prices. Offshore drilling, the tapping into known deposits that could reduce the cost at the pump. Lead by enviormental activist friendly reps from Florida and California this measure was defeated.

The siteing of "It may reduce tourism in our states". Hey guess what .... Tourism will be reduced because the average LEGAL family will not be able to afford a vacation to your states. Seing how you want to take our monies and keep fuel at high prices and make the LEGAL citizens pay extra on your fiscal mumbo jumbo policies.

SO tell me whats wrong with this?

Incredable, no other way to describe it. In Texas there are jobs paying 18 an hour that are being given to ILEGALS. These are not unskilled labor service jobs either, but skilled jobs that require some sort of training to get.

http://www.kfdm.com/engine.pl?station=kfdm&id=14706&template=pagesearch.shtml

Camille Briggs BUNA BASED SOUTHEAST TEXAS INDUSTRIES SAYS IT HAS EXHAUSTED EFFORTS TO FIND QUALIFIED WORKERS IN SOUTHEAST TEXAS.
COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES SAY THEY'VE BEEN FORCED TO GO ACROSS THE BORDER TO SEEK OUT EMPLOYEES.

THE COMPANY'S ATTORNEY PETITIONED THE VIDOR CITY COUNCIL TONIGHT TO ALLOW THEM TO HOUSE UP TO 100 DOCUMENTED MEXICAN WORKERS ON SITE ... TO FILL ITS NEED.
REPRESENTS FROM LOCAL LABOR UNIONS EACH TOOK TURNS VOICING THEIR DISAPPROVAL OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INDUSTRIES DURING THURSDAY'S VIDOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS INDUSTRIES' ATTORNEY ... JIM WIMBERLEY IS ASKING THE VIDOR CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW HIS CLIENT TO HOUSE DOZENS OF MEXICAN WORKERS IN A FENCED IN AREA ON SITE.

WIMBERLEY SAYS THE COMPANY HAS WORKED FOR MONTHS TRYING TO HIRE LOCAL SKILLED LABOR, BUT HAS COME UP SHORT.

(HAVE THEY LOOKED TO PITTSBURGH, LOT OF UNEMPLOYED STEEL WORKERS THERE!!!!!)

SO THE COMPANY WANTS TO HIRE UP TO 100 MEXICAN WORKERS UNTIL THE JOB MARKET IMPROVES OR UNTIL THE JOB IS DONE.

Jim Wimberley/Southeast Texas Industries
"The maximum they could stay here is 10 months. You can bring in another crew in for 10 months then our contract would be up."
Camille Briggs/Reporting
"The company plans to house up to 100 Mexican workers on the property next to its main building. Their food, lodging and utilities would be paid for by the company. Union members say if they are paying them $18 an hour ... That just doesn't add up."
Jerry Wayne Pillsbury/Pipefitters Union.

PILLSBURY BELIEVES THERE ARE PLENTY OF LOCAL WORKERS AVAILABLE AND WILLING TO WORK IF THE COMPANY IS PAYING A FAIR WAGE.


(YOU BET THERE ARE LOTS OF AMERICANS WHO WOULD DO THIS WORK BUT WHAT IS FAILED TO BE SAID IS THAT THE COMPANY DOES NOT WANT TO PAY ANY BENIFITS. THIS IS WHY THE PUSH TO HIRE MEXICANS TO DO THIS JOB. IF THEY OFFERED THE JOB TO AMERICAN CITIZENS AND OFFERED TO HOUSE THEM I AM SURE THEY WOULD GET PEOPLE WILLING TO WORK.)

( DO THE MATH .... 12 HOURS A DAY 7 DAYS A WEEK ..... 18 AN HOUR = $1386.00 STRAIGHT TIME. NOW ADD OVERTIME TO THIS AND YOU GET $2274 A WEEK. ON A TEN MONTH CONTRACT THEY WILL PAY $90,960.00 DOLLARS. OH YEAH JOBS AMERICANS WON'T DO .... MY ASS!!!!
IF THEY DO NOT PAY OVERTIME IT IS STILL $53,840.)

What a very sad sad sad day in American history. As we face a threat not only from radical Islamofacist, but an invasion from south of the boarder that threatens our way of life as we know it.

The Senate and the current administration is trying to play to both sides of the fence without doing a single thing. The false sense of securing the boarder with the falsehood of putting the National Guard on the boarder, then voting to build at least 370 miles of fence along a 2000 mile boarder. All this is not only insulting but appeasing to foriegn governments who are unfriendly to America.

This plan to put Guardsman on the boarder but not allowing them to enforce the law is ludicrice. It is shamefull and a waste of resources. The Guardsmen will not be secureing anything other then the coffe maker and being gophers for the Mexican Consulates who seem to be running our Boarder Patrol.

With the INS agents who are to to now go to the boarder will never make it. They will be busy training the guardsman in paper shuffle. As soon as the training is complete the guardsman will have done their time and a new group will be sent in to be trained. So with this process going on when will these Agents ever get out to the boarder to enforce THE LAWS? The answer is simple .... they won't.

So far the only thing that looks promiseing from our lack luster government is this 370 miles of fence. At least it is a start.

Senate OKs Border Fence, Backs Citizenship

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/17/D8HLNOKO0.html

The Senate endorsed a chance at citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants Wednesday but also voted to build 370 miles of triple- layered fencing along the Mexican border in increasingly emotional debate over election-year immigration legislation.

The Senate had voted 83-16 in favor of construction of the fence and 500 miles of vehicle barriers, the first significant victory in two days for conservatives seeking to place their stamp on the measure.

The developments unfolded in a volatile political environment. The White House struggled for a second day to ease the concerns of House Republicans who contend that Bush favors amnesty for illegal immigrants, and demonstrators massed a few blocks from the Capitol demanding immigrant rights.

Construction of the barrier would send "a signal that open-border days are over. ... Good fences make good neighbors, fences don't make bad neighbors," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. He said border areas where barriers already exist have experienced economic improvement and reduced crime.

NOW IF WE CAN ONLY CONVINCE MEXICO TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIER CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND THE REAL POWER IN MEXICO THE DRUG LORDS.

Well for 48 hours I have not blogged hopeing to get some sort of reply or input on any redeeming factor to the assailants of a ONE DAY OLD CHILD. Either you all agree that there is nothing redeemable to these perverted sick puppies or are afraid to respond.

Being afraid to respond I find hard to believe as I have been called every name in the book for some of my other comments. So a lack of being able to find one single reason to try and reabilitate these people is why the silence.

I guess even the most enlightened thinkers are in agreement that they wouold not one of these sicko's set free to live next to them and their children.

If you are not sure of what I am speaking about then read the previouse blog.

The following is food for thought to all those who are progresive thinkers, and of the enlightened set. I ask for your comments and thoughts. Before you answer to the following blog, I want you to think real hard about this story and consider that the victem is your child, or sister, brother. Is there really any redeeming factor, or quality to the assaliant.

This case envolves a ONE DAY OLD CHILD. I can think of no more sick or disgusting act then a sexual assault upon a child. Here is the story.

2 charged with rape of newborn
Newborn placed with relatives after both parents arrested in McKenzie

The Jackson Sun

http://www.jacksonsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060513/NEWS01/605130304/1002

McKenzie police have charged two Carroll County parents with raping their child.

Jonathan Wayne Goodrum, 19, and Kristina Louise Sawyer, 18, are charged with raping their 1-day-old girl before she was taken home from McKenzie Regional Hospital about six weeks ago, said McKenzie Police Lt. Tim Nanney.

While both parents have been charged, Sawyer's bond was reduced because police still are investigating what role, if any, she played in the possible rape of her child, Nanney said. She was charged because "I could not exclude her from being part of it, so I had to charge her also," he said. "I could not exclude her at the time from being a participant of it."

Nanney said hospital officials notified police of the possible rape after noticing injuries to the child's rear during a routine examination given before newborns are released from the hospital.
"There were some skin tears in and around the private (back) area of the child," he said.

Now tell me that, and it does not matter who did this. That there is something redeemable in the person who commited such an act of depravity. This was a child only ONE DAY OLD. Not only is it sick to have happened to a child but one that has not even been released from the hospitol yet.

I would like to here from those enlightened thinkers who think that this person can and should be rehabilitated. Then I would like to know if you would allow this person to move into the house next door or apartment next to your children.

I have my own ideas of what the punishment should be but want to hear yours.

Poor Boston Collage, they loose a man of respect and moral high , baaawwwww hahahahahahaha. I am sorry I have to laugh at the letter of resignation form this proffesor. Lets have a look at his goodbye shall we.

Condoleezza Rice at Boston College? I quit
By Steve Almond | May 12, 2006

An open letter to William P. Leahy, SJ, president of Boston College.

I am writing to resign my post as an adjunct professor of English at Boston College.

I am doing so -- after five years at BC, and with tremendous regret -- as a direct result of your decision to invite Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to be the commencement speaker at this year's graduation.

[THE TRUTH ... I WILL NOT WORK IN AN ENVIORMENT THAT SUPPORTS OR EXTENDS THE HAND OF FREE SPEECH TO THOSE WHO OPPOSE MY LEFT LEANING IDEOLOGY.]

Many members of the faculty and student body already have voiced their objection to the invitation, arguing that Rice's actions as secretary of state are inconsistent with the broader humanistic values of the university and the Catholic and Jesuit traditions from which those values derive.

[THE TRUTH ... THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN BRAIN WASHED BY MYSELF AND OTHER LEFTIST WILL OPPOSE THE THOUGHT OF SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT SUBSCRIBE TO SOCIALISM.]

But I am not writing this letter simply because of an objection to the war against Iraq. My concern is more fundamental. Simply put, Rice is a liar.

She has lied to the American people knowingly, repeatedly, often extravagantly over the past five years, in an effort to justify a pathologically misguided foreign policy.

[THE TRUTH ... I DO NOT SUPPORT THE FACT THE UNITED STATES SHOULD OR IS A SUPER POWER. ALL WHO WOULD TRY TO BRING DEMOCRACY TO THE WORLD ARE EVIL AND LIARS.]

The public record of her deceits is extensive. During the ramp-up to the Iraq war, she made 29 false or misleading public statements concerning Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda, according to a congressional investigation by the House Committee on Government Reform.

[THE TRUTH .... BECAUSE THE MSM AND OTHER COCONSPIRITORS DID NOT FIND A SMOKING GUN , DIDNT LOOK FOR ONE EITHER. THE INTEL PRESENTED BEFORE THE WAR MUST BE AND IS FALSE. THE WHOLE WORLD IS WRONG AND I AM RIGHT.]

To cite one example:

In an effort to build the case for war, then-National Security Adviser Rice repeatedly asserted that Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapon, and specifically seeking uranium in Africa.

[THE TRUTH .... WE SENT A PARTICIAN INSPECTOR TO NIGERIA AND BETWEEN DINNERS AND OTHER DIVERSIONS HE DID NOT SEEK ANY INFORMATION ON YELLOW CAKE. NO ONE RAN UP TO HIM AND PRESENTED EVIDANCE OF IRAQ SEEKING YELLOW CAKE. HE DID NOT BOTHER TO CONFIRM A SALE THAT WAS KNOWN AND PROVEN , THEREFORE THE YELLOW CAKE IS A LIE AND THE BRITISH ARE DUPES FOR TELING US OF THIS PURCHASE.]

In July of 2003, after these claims were disproved, Rice said: ''Now if there were doubts about the underlying intelligence . . . those doubts were not communicated to the president, the vice president, or to me."

Rice's own deputy, Stephen Hadley, later admitted that the CIA had sent her a memo eight months earlier warning against the use of this claim.

[THE TRUTH ... WITH OUR OWN LEFTIST IN THE CIA AND OTHER PARTS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT, WE WARNED/LIED ABOUT ANY THREAT OR POSSIBLE FUTURE THREAT AND WERE IGNORED. HOWEVER THANKS TO OUR BROTHERS IN THE LEFTIST MEDIA WE TWISTED THE TRUTH ON FACTS AND CLAIM INTELL WAS WRONG. WE WERE IGNORED AND THIS WE DO NOT TOLERATE.]

In the three years since the war began, Rice has continued to misrepresent or simply ignore the truth about our deadly adventure in Iraq.

Like the president whom she serves so faithfully, she refuses to recognize her errors or the tragic consequences of those errors to the young soldiers and civilians dying in Iraq. She is a diplomat whose central allegiance is not to the democratic cause of this nation, but absolute power.

[THE TRUTH .... SINCE SOLDIERS DIE IN WAR , AND THERE ARE CIVILAIN CASULTIES NOT OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP WE CLAIM THAT THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION IS ABUSEING ITS POWER. THE ADGENDA OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION IS NOT THE ADGENDA WE WANT AND THEREFORE IS ALL ABUSE AND LIES.]

This is the woman to whom you will be bestowing an honorary degree, along with the privilege of addressing the graduating class of 2006.

It is this last notion I find most reprehensible: that Boston College would entrust to Rice the role of moral exemplar.

[THE TRUTH ... I FEEL THAT THERE ARE MORE DESERVING PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE SAME POLITICAL ADGENDA AS MYSELF. THESE ARE THE ONES WHO DESERVE AN FALSE DEGREE THAT WE CAN PROP UP AND BE PROUD OF. IF WE SUPPORT THOSE ON THE LEFT WITH AKOLADES THEN ONLY OUR IDEAOLOGY WILL BE TAUGHT.]

To be clear: I am not questioning her intellectual gifts or academic accomplishments. Nor her potentially inspiring role as a powerful woman of color.

[THE TRUTH .... I CANNOT QUESTION HER INTELLIGENCE AS SHE IS SMARTER THAN I.]

But these are not the factors by which a commencement speaker should be judged. It is the content of one's character that matters here -- the reverence for truth and knowledge that Boston College purports to champion.

[THE TRUTH .... THE FACTORS IN WHICH WE SHOULD JUDGE A PERSON ARE AS FOLLOWS. DO THEY SEEK THE SAME GOAL AS US. ARE THEY ON OUR SIDE. ARE THEY ANTI MILITARY AS THIS IS A WASTE OF OUR TIME. DO THEY AGREE THAT DIPLOMACY AND KOWTOWING TO THE WORLD ORDER IS BETTER THEN HAVEING A NATIONAL SOVERIGNTRY. THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO LOOK FOR AND SUPPORT.]

Rice does not personify these values; she repudiates them. Whatever inspiring rhetoric she might present to the graduating class, her actions as a citizen and politician tell a different story.

Honestly, Father Leahy, what lessons do you expect her to impart to impressionable seniors?

That hard work in the corporate sector might gain them a spot on the board of Chevron? That they, too, might someday have an oil tanker named after them? That it is acceptable to lie to the American people for political gain?

[THE TRUTH .... WE CANNOT SUPPORT SOMEONE WHO DEMONSTRATES ALL WE OPPOSE AS LEFTISTS. IF STUDENTS START TO REALIZE THAT THEY ARE JUDGED BY THEIR DEEDS AND HAVE SELF IMPORTANCE THEN THEIR DEPENDANCY ON THE STATE WILL DISSOLVE. WE MUST HAVE A DEPENDANT CITIZENRY TO ENSURE A POWER BASE FOR THE LEFT TO RULE OVER. THE IDEA OF EVERYONE IS THE SAME AND NOONE HAS ANY ABILITY BETTER THEN ANOTHER MUST CONTINUE TO BE TAUGHT SO THAT WE CAN MAINTAIN CONTROL OVER THE POPULANCE THROUGH SOCIAL PROGRAMS THAT BLEED THE RICH DRY, WHILE WE REDISTRIBUTE THEIR MONIES INTO OUR POCKETS.]

Given the widespread objection to inviting Rice, I would like to think you will rescind the offer. But that is clearly not going to happen.

Like the administration in Washington, you appear too proud to admit to your mistake. Instead, you will mouth a bunch of platitudes, all of which boil down to: You don't want to lose face.

In this sense, you leave me no choice.

I cannot, in good conscience, exhort my students to pursue truth and knowledge, then collect a paycheck from an institution that displays such flagrant disregard for both.

[THE TRUTH .... FATHER YOU LEAVE ME NO CHOICE BUT TO MAKE A PUBLIC SPECTACLE OUT OF THIS. DO MY BEST TO EMBARISH YOU AND THE COLLAGE. I MUST SHOW THAT BOSTON COLLAGE IS FAILING TO PURSUE A LEFT LEANING DOCTRINE. I WILL BE LEFT WITH NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE BUT TO TRY AND BLACKMAIL YOU INTO STAYING TRUE TO THE SOCIALIST IDEAOLOGY.]

I would like to apologize to my students and prospective students. I would also urge them to investigate the words and actions of Rice, and to exercise their own First Amendment rights at her speech.

[THE TRUTH ... FOR ALL THOSE WE HAVE BRAINWASHED AND NOW ARE FEELING ABADONED DO NOT LOOSE FAITH IN THE LEFTIST DREAM.WE CAN STILL WIN THE DAY BY ABUSEING THE BILL OF RIGHTS, TWISTING THEM TO OUR GOALS AND PUNISHING ALL WHO OPPOSE OUR GOALS. HEAR ME NOW LEFTIST BROTHERS AND SISTERS, WE CAN STILL STIFFLE THE VOICE OF TRUTH AND REPLACE IT WITRH OUR SPIN AND DIATRIBE OF LIES.]

A very interesting letter of resignation from the old prof don't you think?

Anyone who looks at the arbitron ratings can see that Air America is done, over, finished, shoot the poor thing and let it be done. Yes there are several markets that it actually is doing well in but nationally it rates lower then an infomercial.

Yes there is a market for liberal talk. A rather large market I believe. The problem is not with the idea or concept of having an opposing view to talk radio as it stands today. The problem lies in who the air talent is and who produces the shows.

What has made talk radio such a hot commodity is the way it is run. Yes there are a few shows that are hardliners and do not let debate happen. The vast majority and more succesful shows run on the basis that hey we are conservative. We stand here on our opinion, where do you stand, and base your argument on facts not emotions.

A lively debate that encourages the free exchange of facts, not emotions. When emotional callers get on the air it is simetimes fun to listen to them make fools out of themselves. This on an every minute account does not make for good radio however. This is why the far left accuses talk radio of being one sided. Far from the truth. Just because emmotional callers are not allowed their rants on air does not make it unfair, thats bad showmanship.If one listens to talk radio on a daily basis you can easily hear when a caller has no valid point and has no clue to what they are argueing. When the caller bases their view with solid facts or reasoning the host will most times on most shows debate the caller. This is good radio.

This is why Air America has bombed. The lack of talent to host the shows. A one sided emotional drivel that does not allow for open debate on any topic. If you call in to Air America with a dissenting point of view , the host ridicules you. Refuses to listen to your point of view and gets 9 out of 10 times hysterical over an opposeing view.

Air America could have been a reasonable outlet for the left, if and only if they did not jump on the extremist boat and hire the wrong talent ... rather hire the lack of talent.

I always thought that the Pope was in charge of the Catholic Church yet lookking at what is happening with the Church I wonder. Is it the Cardinals who secretely control and run things. The Church has always had a political adgenda. There is no denying this. Behind the scenes for centuries there has been a cardinal who with threats of excomunication to world leaders have shaped and forced policy.

Now the Church is being threatened from within its own ranks. Is the Pope really just a figurehead and has no power other then raise money and lead prayer? Link to Michelle Malkin for the full story [ http://michellemalkin.com/]

BELGIAN CHURCHES ISLAMIFIED
By Michelle Malkin · May 07, 2006 04:41 PM

This story is really scary as to what these folks are doing inside the church. I see it as a desecration to a religion by members of another religion. But this has the blessings of the Belgion Bishops. The church of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour, Brussels is being turned into a Muslim center for Islam. Having tents set up inside the church and starting fires inside.

The Bishops have even gone as far as to move and cover up religious items so that it does not offend the Muslims. What does the Pope think about this? Is he the leader or not. Does the phrase turn the other cheek mean to kowtow and stop believing in ones own religion?

For pictures and alittle more insight go to The Brussels Journel

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1053

the artical : Allah Takes Over Church

Again this is just one instance of the Catholic Church being taken over by political extremists. Here in the United States we have to deal with in California, Cardinal Roger Mahony. A man who thinks the law does not apply to him, ILEGALS, or to the pediphiles under his protection in the Church.

SO who actually runs the Church anyway?

In the topsey turvey world of international intelligence, our politicians show their inept understanding of what it takes to run such organizations. The debate is on who should and should not be in charge of the CIA.

A leading Republican came out against the front-runner for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, saying Sunday the spy agency should not have military leadership during a turbulent time among intelligence agencies. Why not is a good question. Here is a man who has spent years in the field of intelligance gathering. Yet because he is military it should disqualify him.

Members of the Senate committee that would consider President Bush's nominee also expressed reservations, saying the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters. A false assumption by politico's. The fact he is military means the chance of him running a tighter ship with fewer Valerie Plames and other leakers who seek self gratification by betraying this country with self seving intrests. By being from the military and haveing a distinguished career like his he has a better understanding of the needs that are to be met. Setting goals and following through on achieving these goals.

If Hayden were to get the nomination, military officers would run the major spy agencies in the United States, from the ultra-secret National Security Agency to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

"You can't have the military control most of the major aspects of intelligence," said Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The CIA "is a civilian agency and is meant to be a civilian agency," she said on ABC's "This Week."

A second committee member, GOP Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, added, "I think the fact that he is a part of the military today would be the major problem."

Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., mentioned fears the CIA would "just be gobbled up by the Defense Department" if Hayden were to take over.

See right there is the problem. By putting a military person in charge certain elected members of governbment are afraid that they will loose their person power of persuasion on the CIA. Bringing up fears of a possible military coup. False statments of the military taking over all the governments intel agencies. The truth far from this. If Gen. Hayden is approved the stars will be removed from his shoulders. The CIA will still be controled by a political oversight commitee that will as always play politics with the countries security. The fact that by having a military man in charge who understands the inner workings of the different agencies and able to smooth over and around certain interagencie territorial pompusness would be a plus .... not a hinderance or a bad thing.

Bottom line it boils down to the fact that elected officials will more then likely loose their personal p.c. control and adgenda pressure on stirring the agency on their adgenda and not the best interest of the nation.

Just recieved this information and needed to pass it on to all.

Sunday, May 7, 2006
Defend Colorado Now alert: attend May immigration panel debates TOMORROW!

Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform (CAIR) will be hosting a May
Immigration Forum
TOMORROW, Monday May 8, 2006
at the Smoky Hill Library, 5430 S. Biscay Circle, Centennial

A second Forum will be held on Monday, May 15
at the Koelbel Library, 5955 South Holly Street, Centennial

The Arapahoe Library District will co-host these public events from
6:30pm-8:30pm. A panel discussion on immigration-related issues will be
moderated by Mr. Adam Schrager, 9NEWS Legislative Reporter.

Panel members will cover a wide range of local issues, including the
controversial Defend Colorado Now, a proposed state ballot initiative that
would deny local government services to illegal immigrants. Confirmed
panelists include: Fred Elbel, of Defend Colorado Now; Frosty Wooldridge,
immigration activist; Rich Jones, of the Bell Policy Center; James
Johnson, representing Keep Colorado Safe.

Stan Weekes, forum organizer and CAIR spokesman, said, “Immigration is now
the most important issue in the state, and the discussion will be decided
by the voters, educated at these kinds of forums.” The forums are free
and open to the public.

Pre-Registration is requested, but not necessary. Call 303-693-7449 to
register for Smoky Hill; registration for Koelbel is 303-220-7704.

I have to laugh and giggle at this. I mean it is just deserts for those who break the law, support breaking the law, and advocate breaking the law. If you are a criminal you should always be looking over your shoulder for the man to come and drag you away.

This is just exactly what seems to be hitting Queens New York.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/415624p-351089c.html

Rumors fly as feds deny immig raids



BY LESLIE CASIMIR
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Rumours are rampant in the city's immigrant communities that federal agents are swooping down into neighborhoods and plucking undocumented workers from restaurants, car washes and even soccer fields.
"My employees are nervous to come to work now," said Ana, a Woodhaven, Queens, hair salon owner who called the Daily News to report an unsubstantiated raid of a Latino food restaurant on Jamaica Ave. and 104th St. "I really don't know what to tell them."

The stories are not true, advocates and immigration officials say.

Yet, they continue to spread quickly among tens of thousands of New Yorkers who live and work without legal papers - and for whom the fear of deportation, real or not, is ever present.

Dozens of organizations held an emergency meeting in Queens on April 28 to discuss the paranoia, said Monami Maulik, executive director of Desis Rising Up and Moving or DRUM.

The false rumors seem to have started after the federal Department of Homeland Security announced last month that it was stepping up efforts targeting employers who hire undocumented workers.

(HERE IS THE REAL SHAME. THE FACT IT IS ONLY RUMORS AND THE FEDS ARE NOT DOING THE JOB THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING.)

Soon after, on April 19, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement carried out a multicity raid, hitting 52 work sites operated by IFCO Services, a pallet supply company headquartered in Houston, including one factory on Long Island. A total of 1,200 workers and several managers have been arrested.

At about the same time, immigrants throughout the nation started asserting themselves with massive marches and rallies, said Kavita Pawria, legal and policy organizer at DRUM. Many New Yorkers who attended the rallies said they had decided to participate despite fears of being arrested.

(IMMIGRANTS? PHHHHHTTT!! YOU MEAN ILEGALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS FLAUNTING THE FACT THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW WITHOUT ANY FEAR OF PUNISHMENT)

"It's happening at a particular moment when immigrants have been very vocal," Pawria said. "There's so much mistrust."

Rosa, a Mexican immigrant from Queens, told The News that a Bronx car wash on Fordham Road and Webster Ave. was raided last week by immigration officials. Immigrants playing a soccer match also were arrested at a park in Westchester County recently, she believed.

But neither roundup actually happened, according the the feds.

(AGAIN THAT IS A SHAME THE FEDS DID NOT DO THEIR JOB)

Marc Raimondi, a spokesman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the stories are all false and he stressed that the agency is not haphazardly targeting undocumented immigrants.

"We don't do random sweeps - we do targeted enforcement actions," he said. "We've said all along our enforcement actions are intelligence driven. They are not random."

NOW THIS IS THE PROBLEM. THEY SPEND TO MUCH TIME SITTING IN THEIR OFFICES DEBATEING ON WHAT WILL BE THE BETTER P.R. AND LESS LIKELY TO CAUSE LAW SUITS BY ACTIVIST LAWYERS. THEY SHOULD BE DOING NATION WIDE RANDOM SWEEPS. PUT THE FEAR OF THE LAW INTO THOSE WHO WILLINGLY BREAK THE LAW. THE SWEEPS NEED TO INCLUDE ARRESTS OF THE EMPLOYERS WHO HIRE ILEGALS OVER CITIZENS.

DO NOT TELL ME EVER AGAIN ABOUT IT IS JOBS AMERICANS WON'T DO. THIS LIE IS JUST THAT A LIE. IT REALLY IS A MATTER OF INVASION AND THE FACT THAT EMPLOYERS ARE POCKETING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BY PAYING BELOW MARKET WAGES WITHOUT BENIFITS AND THE TAXES ON THE WAGES.

More examples and atrocities from the Islamic Peaceful religion. A religion that claims tolerance and openess. With each and every day that passes the truth of this male dominated, oppresive, and conflicting wantabe religion comes to the surface.

Not to long ago we all heard of the reported murder of Atwar Bahjat. A reporter trying to tell the truth of what was happening in her country. About those who are causeing dissent and making violance upon the innocent. A woman who was proud to be Muslim and devote in her beliefs of a peaceful resolution to form a new leading government in the middle east.

What really happened to her? How was she repayed in her struggle for exposeing the truth. Read excerpts from the following and learn.

http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/004507.html

May 07, 2006
The Killing of Atwar Bahjat
Greyhawk

Two men drove up in a pick-up truck, asking for her. She appealed to a small crowd that had gathered around her crew but nobody was willing to help her. It was reported at the time that she had been shot dead with her cameraman and sound man.

We now know that it was not that swift for Bahjat. First she was stripped to the waist, a humiliation for any woman but particularly so for a pious Muslim who concealed her hair, arms and legs from men other than her father and brother.

Then her arms were bound behind her back. A golden locket in the shape of Iraq that became her glittering trademark in front of the television cameras must have been removed at some point — it is nowhere to be seen in the grainy film, which was made by someone who pointed a mobile phone at her as she lay on a patch of earth in mortal terror.

By the time filming begins, the condemned woman has been blindfolded with a white bandage.

It is stained with blood that trickles from a wound on the left side of her head. She is moaning, although whether from the pain of what has already been done to her or from the fear of what is about to be inflicted is unclear.

Just as Bahjat bore witness to countless atrocities that she covered for her television station, Al-Arabiya, during Iraq’s descent into sectarian conflict, so the recording of her execution embodies the depths of the country’s depravity after three years of war.

A large man dressed in military fatigues, boots and cap approaches from behind and covers her mouth with his left hand. In his right hand, he clutches a large knife with a black handle and an 8in blade. He proceeds to cut her throat from the middle, slicing from side to side.

Her cries — “Ah, ah, ah” — can be heard above the “Allahu akbar” (God is greatest) intoned by the holder of the mobile phone.

Even then, there is no quick release for Bahjat. Her executioner suddenly stands up, his job only half done. A second man in a dark T-shirt and camouflage trousers places his right khaki boot on her abdomen and pushes down hard eight times, forcing a rush of blood from her wounds as she moves her head from right to left.

Only now does the executioner return to finish the task. He hacks off her head and drops it to the ground, then picks it up again and perches it on her bare chest so that it faces the film-maker in a grotesque parody of one of her pieces to camera.

The voice of one of the Arab world’s most highly regarded and outspoken journalists has been silenced. She was 30.

DID THESE VILE RUFFIANS WHO ARE NOTHING MORE THEN COWARDS AND PIG FARMERS, DO ANYTHING ELSE TO THIS POOR WOMAN?

Other gruesome details from a family friend: She had nine drill holes in her right arm and 10 in her left, he said. The drill had also been applied to her legs, her navel and her right eye.

OH MY YES THIS IS JUST A PEACEFUL RELIGION WHO ONLY WANTS OPENESS AND TOLERANCE IN THE WORLD. WITH THUGS AND COWARDLY WANT A BE MEN WHO HAVE TO IMPOSE THEIR WILL BY TORTUREING A WOMAN WITH DRILLS AND ABUSEING HER MORALLY ALL IN THE NAME OF THEIR IDEA OF RELIGION. WHO CAN POSSIBLY FEEL ANY SYMPATHY FOR THESE TERRORISTS.

THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THIS GROUP HAS TIES TO HAMMAS , AND OTHER WELL KNOWN DUNG HEARDERS. SO WHY DO MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANT TO DEAL WITH THESE SORRY EXCUSES OF HUMAN LIFE?

WHY IS THERE NOT MORE MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERAGE OF THESE MURDEROUS ATTACKS? WHY DO WE HAVE TO TURN TO THE BLOGASPHERE TO GET REPORTING OR TO JUST THE INTERNET. MEDIA FROM EUROPE COVERS THIS BUT AMERICAN NETWORKS REFUSE TO TALK ABOUT IT.

THIS P[OOR WOMAN DESERVES JUSTICE AND PEACE. UNTILL HER KILLERS ARE BROUGHT FORTH AND PROSECUTED FOR THEIR CRIMES. THE STANDARD PRACTICE OF TWISTING A RELIGION WILL CONTINUE.

With schools getting oput for summer vacation, and families trying to figure out the first trip of the summer. The question is ... What shall we do in May?

As it happens May is National Military Appreciation Month. So consider the following daily things to do.



A DOZEN WAYS TO SUPPORT OUR MILITARY!

#1 FLY THE FLAG ON YOUR HOUSE, CAR, or BUSINESS DURING MAY

#2 SEND AN EMAIL OR LETTER OF THANKS THROUGH A Million Thanks

#3 SEND A CARE PACKAGE TO A SOLDIER THROUGH USOCARES

#4 ORGANIZE AN EVENT IN YOUR OWN COMMUNITY, AND AT YOUR WORKPLACE

#5 ASK YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS AT ALL LEVELS TO RECOGNIZE OUR MILITARY

#6 WEAR A SUPPORT OUR TROOPS WRISTBAND OR SHIRT

#7 REGISTER YOUR SUPPORT AT America Supports You!

#8 ASK LIBRARIES, SCHOOLS, ORGANIZATIONS TO PARTICIPATE IN RECOGNIZING OUR ARMED FORCES

#9 ASK LOCAL MEDIA (TV, RADIO, NEWSPAPER) TO FEATURE

#10 WHEN YOU SEE A PERSON IN A MILITARY UNIFORM, SHAKE THEIR HAND AND SAY, "THANK YOU FOR SERVING OUR COUNTRY"

#11 RAISE FUNDS FOR MILITARY CHARITIES
#12 HIRE A VETERAN

Want to travel to events check these out.

Ft Lauderdale, FL May 6-7. Fleet Week USA Officially kicks off National Military Appreciation Month.

Langley AFB, VA May 5-7: Air Power Over Hampton Roads

Indiana: Amateur Radio Military Appreciation Day for 2006 events planned.

Sacramento, CA May 21: A 15 Day Parade of Patriots Begins

Dallas, TX May 20-21: University of Dallas would like to honor all of those in the UD family who have served.

Colorado ... Royal George park, May 1-31, 2006: Military Appreciation Month, 50% Off Admissions.
Cripple Creek Co KOA: Come help celebrate our Patriotic Bivouac at Cripple Creek, CO KOA from May 15 through May 24, 2006.

There are all sorts of wonderful events happening this month to show support for the Military. Just check with a local V.F.W. or American Legion post. I myself will go to my V.F.W. post 4171 and check on events there.

Formore info nationally go to the following site:

http://www.nmam.org/index.htm

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM AND ENJOY THE FREEDOMS THEY PROTECT.

We are entering a very scary time in our nations history. While we are under attack on fronts not only in distant lands but unfriendly governments are stirring up dissention among ethnic groups with in our boarders.

As an election looms this year, voters need to look long and hard at the results their vote will bring. The big picture so to speak. With a do nothing Republican controlled legislature and a cowardly Senate, is this what we voted for. Then on the other hand. A proven track record or no military love, lack of national pride, selling this country out to big buisness just as fast but more covertly then the Republicans. The Democrates are already threatening to hold up all legislation in order to go on political witch hunts. These hunts in retribution for not allowing more social entitment programs to be passed and exposeing the corruption within their party.

The international problems that we as a nation are faceing are being compounded by both parties. A lack of effort to secure the national safety, lack of pursueing a fuel policy, no basis to prop up the dollar versus foriegn currancy, letting the trade deficiet run rampped. The planning of increaseing entitlement programs that do not aid but hinder the average middle class tax payer.

A tax system that is out of control and does no good but line the pockets of the government. Allowing lawsuits to not only waste tax payer money by clogging up the system but being out of hand in the extravegant amount of settlements. This in which is also passed on to the tax payer by increase in product prices.

We have one party, the Democrates who want to increase the tax burden while increaseing the burden of cost of living. Wanting to turn and run in conflicts with others around the world while surrendering our role in international leadership.

The Republican party is not much better in this aspect as it talks a bold game for the middle east and Europe yet it is kowtowing to the socialist in Latin and South America. A lack of demanding that these countries who signed on to NAFTA are held to the standards of which they agreed. A fact that neither Canada nor Mexico have done.

Who are we to vote for? Who are we to allow to lead this country? Do we want a legislature that will be a do nothing for us while going after political retribution on their opponets. Or do we want a legislature that lacks the leadership to do what they are elected to do in our name.

I for one definately do not want a couple of years of political witchhunts in the name of political correctness being forced down my throat. In the name of enlightened progressive thinking .... nice way of saying socialism. But on the other hand I surely do not want a legislature that lacks inititive to do what is right for fear of being called names and having the MSM label them.

Well today should be the end to a week of racism and protests. Unfortunately it will continue through the weekend. Today in case you are not aware is the fabled Cinco de Mayo. To many of the misguided youth of the hispanic community they think it is Mexicos independance day. WRONG< OH SO WRONG.

This does not matter as today the weather is cloudy and rainy. YAHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!, should put a damper on their clogging the streets, driving the wrong way and being a general nuisance.

As Monday was a great day in the fact the roads were clear and drive times to work were reduced do to the so called protests. I am hopeing that today will be a short drive time. Unfortunately I have to travel down by federal blvd. This is the main party route for the misguided youths. The local parks there and all over the metro area will be filled with revilers and trash. Fire works will be shot off, not that I am opposed to fireworks but if they get to shot them off why can't Americans do so on the fourth of July? It is against the law in Colorado, that is why.

M.S. - 13 will be out in force today looking to make more drug deals and collect protection monies from the community. La Raza and Mecha will also be out with blowhorns spreading their lies and hatred. Reconquista will be holding small rallies rewriting history, ignoreing the facts and the Treathy of Hildago Guadalupe.

Ah well so ends the week.

Which is more inhuman. A quick and painless death by falling asleep then having your breathing stop, or keeping the same person in a small 7 by 12 foot cell with no human contact. Movement from one cell to another twice a week for one hour at a time. Not allowed to speak or be spoken to.

I personally am in favor of the death penalty. I think that they should be open to the public, and done by either hanging or a fireing squad. The impact of the grafic nature to this type of execution would have a lasting effect on those who think that they can willy nilly be gang bangers. Or just a thug who thinks they can snuff out a life without taking responsibility for their actions.

Anyways Zacarias Moussaouigets life instead of death. Lets just hope in 10 to 15 years we haven't forgotten and some bleeding heart judicial panel lets this camel jocky loose.

The open boarder antiAmerican proILEGAL ALIEN crowd was afraid of a backlash. Well now it begins. A backlash if you can spin it and twist the reality in a racist antihispanic way is beginning.

A hero jumps to the forfront.

Ariz. Posse to Arrest Illegal Immigrants

A posse of 100 volunteers and sheriff's deputies will patrol the Phoenix area and arrest any illegal immigrants, the county sheriff said.

The group likely will be deployed across parts of Maricopa County by the weekend, Sheriff Joe Arpaio said Wednesday.

Volunteers will be drawn from the department's 3,000-member posse, whose members are trained and are often former deputies.

"It's important to send the message out to stay in Mexico and don't come roaming around here hoping you're going to get amnesty," said Arpaio, who in years past gained notoriety for putting inmates on chain gangs and issuing them striped uniforms and pink underwear.

Arpaio's deputies have already arrested about 120 illegal immigrants using a new state smuggling law.

"We're going to arrest any illegal who violates this new law," he said. "I'm not going to turn these people over to federal authorities so they can have a free ride back to Mexico. I'll give them a free ride into the county jail."

WHY IS THE SHERRIF A HERO? BECAUSE HE IS STANDING UP TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND LAW BREAKERS. HE IS ENFORCEING THE LAW!!!!!

Los Angeles Times

Anti-invader forces share a wide tent
...They are picketing Mexican consulates; they're building a barbed wire fence on the border and phoning lawmakers to protest legislation that would allow illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. They have sponsored anti-illegal immigrant initiatives in Colorado and Phoenix.

Joe Kovacs -- WorldNetDaily.com

Americans fight back against illegals influx
With the federal government having a perceived do-nothing attitude to stop the ongoing invasion of illegal aliens into the U.S., fed-up Americans are logging on to the Internet to fight their own battle. -- A number of websites have popped up in recent days to help authorities identify and locate the unlawful workers.
Washington Post

Seeing Vote's Effects Far Beyond Herndon

National anti-immigration groups warned politicians yesterday that Tuesday's election in Herndon was the beginning of a voter backlash against local and federal immigration policy. -- "Politicians across the country should take note of the results of this election," said Chris Simcox, president of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps.

DO NOT FORGET HOW BACK EAST THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS NO ENFORCEING THE NONHIREING OF ILEGALS ON A HEALTH BASIS. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I PREVIOUS BLOG (WHAT IF IT WASN'T THE MUMPS). WITH THE RISE OF T.B. AND OTHER COMUNICABLE DISESES.

LET THE BACKLASH BEGIN ..... IT IS AFTERALL ABOUT TIME THE LAW WAS ENFORCED!!!!!!

Again the MSM fails to report the real news of what is happening. Very disturbing reports are now filtering onto the blogsphere about how just nonpeaceful these ILEGAL ALIEN protests were monday.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/040506violentinvasion.htm

Blackout On Violent Illegal Alien Invasions of Schools, County Buildings, Stabbings In Santa Ana
Government buildings locked down during protests in fear of attacks

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | May 4 2006

The media has portrayed the immigration protests as orderly and peaceful yet in Santa Ana California alarming reports have emerged of illegal aliens swarming around in mobs invading schools, carrying out violent beatings and in one incident a county worker had a Mexican flag plunged into his chest.

Latino Americans For Immigration Reform spokeswoman and senatorial candidate Lupe Moreno appeared on The Alex Jones Show to discuss the two incidents.

She first described how on March 27th how a group of rioting Mexicans ran into a local Santa Ana high school and attempted to tear down an American flag. The school police and a police SWAT team had to stand guard to prevent the youths from getting to the flag. This story received no mainstream press coverage whatsoever during the first wave of immigration demonstrations.

Moreno said that the Mexican consulate had penetrated Californian schools with books teaching Hispanics that the American flag is a symbol of the enemy.

County workers in Santa Anna looked out of their windows on May 1st to see Mexicans beating other county workers and police before they rushed towards the government building and stormed it, stabbing one worker with a Mexican flag in the process.

Moreno described the stabbing as seen on a video tape of the incident.

"The men start running and then you can see all these people, and they weren't just kids, some adults and the kids were behind them, but you can see this guy chasing this man down and he plunges the stick of his flag pole into this man's chest."

In all, illegals had broken into five government buildings in the area, causing the county to take the decision to lock down all government buildings during planned demonstrations.

"Why are we letting this happen? It's like a trojan horse, they come bearing gifts to kill us," said Moreno.

"Our country is in serious serious trouble. My children do not want to live in the city they were born in anymore because we have been taken over so badly. 78 per cent of my neighbors are illegal aliens."

Why hasn't the media reported on these violent attacks and stabbings? How many more similar incidents have occurred without receiving any coverage whatsoever?

Moreno said that government workers were afraid that more attacks would take place to coincide with future immigration demonstrations.

WHERE WAS THE MSM ON REPORTING THIS. THEY WERE BUSY ADDING SPIN AND FLUFF TO THOSE WHO BREAK THE LAW AND SPIN TO THEIR REASONS FOR BREAKING THE LAW.

Are we seeing the domino effect happening now in Central and South America. Influences from the Middle East and CHina are creating hostile atitudes to the last bastion of Freedom in the world, America.

Bolivia Nationalizes Natural Gas Industry

By CHRISTINE HAUSER

Published: May 1, 2006
Bolivia's President Evo Morales decreed the nationalization of the country's natural gas industry today, following through on an election pledge to increase control over the energy industry.

Under the decision, he ordered foreign firms to send production to a state company for sales and industrialization, and said that the state will also recover Bolivian hydrocarbons companies that were privatized in the 1990's, with the state taking over shares that are in the hands of foreign companies and of semi-public Bolivian entities, according to an Associated Press report based on Mr. Morales's speech, which was delivered at the country's San Alberto gas and oil field.

He also ordered the military to occupy the natural gas fields, the A.P. said.

"The time has come, the awaited day, a historic day in which Bolivia retakes absolute control of our natural resources," Mr. Morales said from the facility, which is operated by Petrobras of Brazil in association with Repsol-YPF of Spain, the A.P. said.

The move highlights a regional trend in Latin America of a struggle over who controls energy resources. Protesters in Bolivia have in the past called for the outright expropriation of private gas installations operated by British Gas, Repsol, and Petrobras. Such protests over energy policy have weakened or forced out of power a number of presidents in Bolivia, which has South America's second largest natural gas reserves.

In the past, Mr. Morales has raised concerns in the United States and Europe with his plans to increase government control of the energy industry, and with his pledges to decriminalize the cultivation of coca, the plant used to make cocaine.

Mr. Morales warned that companies that rejected the decree would have to leave Bolivia.

He said all the companies must turn their production over to the state's Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos, which was privatized in 1996 and 1997, it reported.

Foreign companies with interests in Bolivia also include British Petroleum, and Total of France. The country likely to be affected the most is Brazil, which is the biggest importer of Bolivian gas, and has a significant investment in Bolivia through Petrobras.

The State Department official said that he did not have a preliminary assessment of the impact the new move would have on United States trade and its relations with Bolivia. The United States gets most of its gas from domestic sources, Canada and Mexico.

The announcement was made on the May 1 national holiday in Bolivia.

"We are trying to get a copy of the proposal and we will discuss it with our Bolivian counterparts and people at the foreign ministry," said a State Department official. "The embassy plans to consult with affected U.S. companies."

A spokesman for BP in London, Robert Wine, said BP has a very small interest in Bolivia as a partner in a joint venture that produces gas equivalent to 15,000 barrels of oil, a small amount compared to BP's 4 million barrels of oil equivalent per day.

Asked how the decision might change BP's interests, Mr. Wine said "We have not seen the detail but I am sure our joint venture partners will be analyzing it. Our partners who are the operators of activities there will be digesting today's news."

The announcement did not come as a surprise.

Mr. Wine noted that there had been political turmoil in Bolivia with public protests over the industry. "The change is not unexpected, but as far as I am aware we were not expecting total nationalization," he said.

Mr. Morales is the country's first indigenous president. Since he was elected in a landslide on Dec. 18, he has emphasized the message that he will lay the groundwork for an economic and political transformation that he says will give voice to the poor, indigenous majority that fueled his campaign.

There have been other measures affecting the sector since Mr. Morales became president.

Last month, moving on a complaint filed by leftist groups, Attorney General Pedro Gareca charged three former presidents and eight former energy ministers with violating the Constitution in signing dozens of contracts with foreign energy companies over the last decade without Congress's approval, Bolivian radio reported, according to Reuters.

The contracts, which included oil companies in Brazil, France and Spain, attracted billions of dollars in investments, but angered groups that accused the firms of plundering Bolivia's resources.

The government is renegotiating contracts that will cost the companies much more in taxes and royalties.

In January, just after he was inaugurated, Mr. Morales appointed Andrés Solíz Rada, a Marxist journalist and former senator, to oversee Bolivia's energy policy.

As president-elect, Mr. Morales met with President Hu Jintao of China in Beijing and called China an "ideological ally," a day after he invited it to develop Bolivia's vast gas reserves.

Who is this Che Guevara that many hispanics hold as a hero. The truth be known he was far from any hero is the sense of protecting the oppressed and righting any wrongs.

Che presided over the Cuban Revolution's first firing squads. He founded Cuba's "labor camp" system—the system that was eventually employed to incarcerate gays, dissidents, and AIDS victims.

This thug was one of the leaders in the Cuban revelution that brought Fidel Castro to power. Che was a totalitarian. He achieved nothing but disaster. Many of the early leaders of the Cuban Revolution favored a democratic or democratic-socialist direction for the new Cuba. But Che was a mainstay of the hardline pro-Soviet faction, and his faction won.

What disaster are you saying. I am saying Cuba is a disaster and a very oppresive state. Anyone whith half a mind can see the oppresive regime that Che helpped bring to power and has lasterd for 60 plus years now under the totalitarian views of Che and Fidel.

In the famous essay in which he issued his ringing call for "two, three, many Vietnams," he also spoke about martyrdom and managed to compose a number of chilling phrases: "Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become …"— and so on. He was killed in Bolivia in 1967, leading a guerrilla movement that had failed to enlist a single Bolivian peasant. And yet he succeeded in inspiring tens of thousands of middle class Latin-Americans to exit the universities and organize guerrilla insurgencies of their own. And these insurgencies likewise accomplished nothing, except to bring about the death of hundreds of thousands, and to set back the cause of Latin-American democracy—a tragedy on the hugest scale.

Today with the socialist movement that is sweeping Central and Southern America I am sure that Che would be proud to see the ties that are being bound to communist China and the Middle east. With the elimination of those who want a free and democratic government being murdered or disposed of in jail be the likes of Hugo Chavez (Venzuala) and the new upstart Bolivian President Evo Morales. Che's dreams of communism and oppresion live on.

The modern-day cult of Che blinds us not just to the past but also to the present. Right now a tremendous social struggle is taking place in Cuba. Dissident liberals have demanded fundamental human rights, and the dictatorship has rounded up all but one or two of the dissident leaders and sentenced them to many years in prison. Among those imprisoned leaders is an important Cuban poet and journalist, Raúl Rivero, who is serving a 20-year sentence. In the last couple of years the dissident movement has sprung up in yet another form in Cuba, as a campaign to establish independent libraries, free of state control; and state repression has fallen on this campaign, too.

Che is nothing more then a propped up murderous thug who the extremists stirring the pot of anarchy are drawing upon to brainwash the younger generations in false historical facts. A self serving pretense to achive a goal of stealing land, property and monies from America because they know if they try to address and change the problems in their own countries it would not be tolerated and they more then likely would end up as Che saw fit to do to those who opposed him ... MURDERED.