Let freedom ring! Let the rule of the people by the people and for the people come forth and govern under a Constitution that is not being perverted and destroyed. That's right the people of Honduras have spoken. Not quietly either. they have united their voices in a democratic fashion and spoken, NO COMMUNISM, NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL LEADERSHIP!

In an election that the current United States Presidential administration , state department, and dictatorial oppressive leaders through out South and Latin America do not like. Honduras has held fast under international pressure and voted the communist Zelaya out!

In case you did not know or forgot. Zelaya was once the President of Honduras. However he was LEGALLY ousted for trying to change the Constitution of Honduras. The Constitution allows for only one term for President and forbids it to be changed. Thus eliminating any sort of power grab by by people like Zelaya. He however tried to defy the Constitution and his own communist party helped to oust him. This created an international scandal. The scandal being that Obama and Hillary backed Zelaya and his illegal power grab. Calling for a stoppage in foreign aid by the United States and other governments until the illegal Zelaya was placed back into power.

Of coarse Hugo Commie Chavez supported Zelaya along with Castro from Cuba, Amadinjhad from Iran and other dictators and anti Democratic oppressors from though out the world. That is why this election results are so special and important. It shows that even under extreme international pressure to place this thug back into power. Under a special election the people spoke and refused him by voting him out. Or you could say refused to vote him back into office.

For a much more indepth coverage of this. GO to Atlas Shrugs. Pamela Gellar as always has the skinny on the deception we get from the MSM here and as to the whole situation.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/obama-and-chavez-backed-zelaya-repudiated-in-today-honduras-election.html

SO you think America is doing the right thing by having civil trials for these degenerate goat herders. You think we as a nation are tough on Terrorism. let us kick back for a bit and put our feet on the table. Get a cup of coffee and watch how the tracking and persecution of murderers is done.

A second bombing of a public train in Russia has been committed by what appears to be Muslims. Watch how the Russians pursue these thugs, thieves and Murderers. There will be no public trial and platform for the terrorist to spout their propaganda from. the Russians will not worry about the terrorist rights. they will pursue and punish accordingly for the crimes these low life's commit.

I have done some reading over the Thanksgiving Holiday and found some interesting things to compare and thought I should share them. It is about the Environmentalism movement.

Let us look at the following here.

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.

The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.

If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.

We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.


There is a group of wannabe "warrior society" that takes a "by any means necessary" approach to "defending mother earth." The group declines to participate in the democratic process, preferring instead to damage, disable, and destroy the property of its ever-growing list of enemies. EF! targets include, but are by no means limited to, loggers, ranchers, and farmers -- especially those who grow genetically modified crops. Earth First!ers' crimes include assault, arson, and untold acts of sabotage. ( from the Earth First web page http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/271 ) That seem to take the last paragraph above and are trying to live it.

Here are some quotes form rather famous, so called intelligent, well known people. Their quotes are related directly to the opening paragraphs in red.

I think it is man made. I think it's clearly man made. If you don't understand what the cause is, it's virtually impossible to come up with a solution. We know what the cause is. The cause is man made. That's the cause. That's why the polar icecap is melting. Joe Biden

Business is recognizing the role it can play in combating climate change. Thank God, is all I can say, for there is a desperately urgent need for business to play that role. Your lobbying influence can be substantial, but together, united and in large enough numbers it could prove decisive in turning the tide. Prince Charles

Renewable energy is proven technology, the price is dropping, the rest of the world is going that way, that's where our investment should be going as well. Bob Brown

If the firms that employ an increasing majority of the population are driven solely to satisfy the owner's greed at the expense of working conditions, of the stability of the community, and of the health of the environment, chances are that the quality of our lives will be worse than it is now. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

There are many who still do not believe that global warming is a problem at all. And it's no wonder: because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere. Al Gore

Do you see a pattern here. A common thread that goes from the first red paragraphs to the quotes. Technology is evil and man is the cause of wrongs. That there should be a change, call for a new structure and appreciation to nature?

Now here is the part I found shocking. If you consider the fact that the man who wrote the first paragraphs has been deemed by psychologists, psychiatrists, members of the F.B.I, and many others to be certifiable crazy. Does it not seem strange that these others who share the same position of technology and the environment are considered to be progressive and deep thinkers?

So who wrote the words I relate these progressives to? It is a man who who was on the F.B.I most wanted list and terrorised this nation for years. It is Theodore Kaczynski the Unabomber.

It is the first five paragraphs from his manifesto. ( http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt )

I have to ask then. If Ted kaczynski is a nutbag, then why are these others not considered nutbags and possible murders to be?

So it is black Friday. Why is it called black Friday? I understand black Monday in October. the day the stock market crashed in the depression. Yet today is not a day that even comes close to that. I have the news on and no one is jumping from windows because their stocks have plummeted. Today is the big shopping day.

It is supposed to be the start of the Holiday Season. A time to rejoice at the birth of our savior. A time for us to remember why Christ died on the cross for us and gave us a new lease on the after life. I see no blackness in this, do you?

As we begin our new found race to purchase items for the holidays. The day after we give thanks for those who came before us, those who defend us, and to those for what ever reason we deem enhanced our little lives. May we not forget the true meaning of the holiday season and its real message for us. Not the giving and receiving of gifts but the celebration of the life over two thousand years ago of a little boy born in a manger. How his life has changed ours for the better, and how we can honor his teachings.

Is it time to boycott certain companies? Why am i even asking this question you ask. I ask it because now that it seems Thanksgiving is over (although it hasn't even had kickoff for the football games). We see nothing but Christmas commercials on television. The assault upon Christian values is in high drive. No longer is it "Merry Christmas", but happy holidays is the accepted p.c. term.

Some school districts are not even allowing Christmas parties for the students, yet the district sure is going to take the days off with pay for the Christian holiday.

So what is there to boycott? Well how about certain companies that have changed the holiday from Christian to Muslim in their advertising of sales. Companies like Best Buy. This company has purposefully and deliberately aimed their advertising towards the muslim community. Why I ask? Are not Christians good enough for their own holiday now? Or is it part of the larger kowtowing to Islam by the west we are seeing here?

I would love to say it is just a sales gimmick and nothing to it. However there is much more to it. We s=not only see Islam creeping into western society, but into the legal system as well. Areas of Michigan recognise sharia law for muslims over the Constitution and law of this land.

We have a President that leans toward the Koran instead of the Bible. His very actions of supposedly indifference do not hide his bias towards Islam and its oppressive ways.

The allowing of prosecution of the military in a time of war for alleged crimes against known terrorist. Whom by the way under the Geneva convention rate only a firing squad upon capture. Look it up, under spies and terrorist in the articles for prisoners of war. The lack, or sow of piss poor leadership and decision making during a time of war for support and command of our troops in a combat zone.

Did Best Buy take their lead from this in their decision to promote Islam over Christian beliefs? It appears to be so. Does this mean we should boycott them for it. Yes it does. It is time that the Judea Christian values that this country was based upon be shoved back to the forefront of our morals.

All we here from the bleeding heart apologist is that we are going to show the world that the American legal system is fair and that we hold our morals to be above all else. So why has the President , Attorney General and others in this administration purposely tainted the jury pool?

Any day one law student should be able to argue successfully that the terrorist cannot receive a fair trail and that under the law rights for the average citizens have been trampled upon. No Miranda readings, no quick trial, no habeous corpus for the goat herders at all. This case is tainted from top to bottom and the defendants, though murderous scum, must be released.

If I was the judge in this case I would bring the defendants to the front of the court house and hold a press conference. There I would list the violations committed by Eric Holder and the current administration in the handling of this procedural fiasco. Then I would order the court officers to release the terrorist then and there on the street.

I would order the police and the court officers to step aside and not hinder the terrorist as they tried to leave New York and this country.

Of coarse I would make it very clear to all in attendance of the press conference and watching/listening that these thugs were loose on the street and would be leaving. The goal would be for the terrorist to get out of New York before real justice could be exacted upon them from the American populace.

Reps Obey and Levin have clearly a different concept of understanding of the Constitution then what I was taught in civics class.

Amendment XVI, ratified February 3Rd 1913, states the following:

The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

This amendment does not state that the taxes collected should only be upon a certain segment of the people. It just states that the basis of the tax does not have to be based on any certain criteria. It would seem to me that any tax proposed on only one segment of the public is at the least unethical , and at the worst immoral.

The proposal is a 1% tax on the lowest incomes, moving upward to 5% on the more wealthy with an additional tax on those who make more then $200,000.00.

The president that appears to being established is that if you want a national defense it can be based upon your personal income, thus removing it from a military status to a hired mercenary organization.

Instead of "PROVIDING FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE" , this proposal smacks of protection for hire, and only to those who can afford it.

It has been leaked that now Obamanation will hold a press conference next week. Tuesday, December 1St to say he will send maybe 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan.

This is good news. It is late and piss poor in timing. It also shows more of President Obama's lack of leadership and understanding of real world crisis.

Let us hope and pray that our troops will get the aid and support they crucially need, and that this is not just a ploy from the left.

Here it comes. Obama and the left campaigned on the fact that the war on terror should be fought in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is their war like it or not. In March of 2009, shortly after settling into office President Obamanation said he had a plan for this battle and was going to implement it. In September of 2009 a request was made by Obama's pick of a commanding officer for more troops in a surge policy that worked in Iraq t be applied in Afghanistan. Here we are in November of 2009 and no decision on an increase of troops has been made yet another tax is being proposed for the American people.

Yes another tax. We are in a governmental sponsored bad economy. One that is being pushed with piss poor policies and ideas from the left to ruin this country and its economy for decades. Refusing to take responsibility for his decision and his WAR. Obama is going to propose more taxes on the wealthy to pay for a war. A war that is supposed to be protecting ALL OF AMERICA. Not just a select portion of the populace.

The TARP act was Bushes and arguably not a good thing. The stimulus and the continued bailout of wall street is Obama and the lefts. The war in Iraq is over and the clean up is moving along. The conflicts (war) that continues is the left and Obama's mess. No one elses. The blame game is tired and old.

It is time that we get some honesty from these BOZO'S in Washington. If Bill Clinton hadn't lied he may have a better persona with American people. Now that Obama denies all and lies from both sides of his mouth he has no respect from the voting constituents.

This new proposed tax is just the lefts way of reaching further into our pockets and STEAL our income, forcing us into indentured servitude to the left. There is NO need for this tax. A responsible government would cut their spending and have the funds. A responsible government would not be proposing a take over of one sixth of the economy and sending businesses into oblivion. A responsible government would encourage industry and entrepreneurship to help with fund raising for our troops.

NOT THIS LEFTIST government! It would rather demand and order a small section of the citizenry to pay for everything.

Is it time for a revolution? Taxation without responsible representation? It is definately time for a change, and for hope!

This is incredible. An elementary schoolchild is able to understand this so why can't the government.

Look if I tell you you are going to spend X, but wait that is too much money. So let us spend Y.
The difference of Y - X = Z. Z is the amount we are going to save by spending Y instead of X.

Looks simple does it not? Here is the problem. X is the same as Y. They are both an increase in spending. I say that again. THEY ARE BOTH AN INCREASE IN SPENDING. It does not matter if we spend X or Y, they both are increase in monies we do not have. Z does not exist. It is a fictitious number thrown out to divert your attention from the fact that spending is increasing period.

It dose not matter if it is the House or the Senates version of health care. They both are an increase in spending. There is no SAVINGS on any of these plans. DO you understand this people?

Many are pushing theories around that it is a move to get more democratic party voters for future elections. This may be a minor reason as to the push to legalise all these ILLEGAL ALIENS. However if you take a closer look at the plan and what it is asking of these law breakers the answer is much simpler.

As with so much of Washington D.C. it boils down to money. This is the main reason for the push that is to come. If they legalise all these under the table and illegal workers they can get their greedy hands on more money.

The treasonous Sec. of Homeland Defense, Janet "open boarders" Napolitono, has laid out the pathway. Her claims of it will be a harder more stricter road are a miss truth. Yes the road will be harder because it will be more expensive for immigrants. A fine, back taxes, new fees, and new taxes are the real reason for this push. If the under rated number of only 12 million illegals is true, then the revenue will be in the high 100's of millions in monies to be collected.

This is a must for this current administration and the other powers of oppression in Congress. They must have more income to pay for their health care scam being forced upon this nation. Without these funds this country has no chance of seeing any light at the end of this debt tunnel that is turning into a shaft spiraling downward.

Do not be fooled by any sort of compassion from these corruptocrats. It is all about power and money for them.

Hey Nicky boy. You say and I quote ”there’s to be no volunteers.” No one except union members may pick up a hoe or shovel, plant a flower or clear a walking path. This is in reference to the young man who is working on his Eagle Scout.

Maybe this young man, Kevin Anderson, 17 would not have had to clear the bike/walking path if instead of using the hoes and shovels as resting sticks. You and your union bullies had done their jobs in the first place. Instead of showing up for work and demanding more pay for even less work done. Your members may have been able to keep their jobs.

Let me give you a few facts pally. This young man is striving to demonstrate his ability to lead by planning, organising, and doing a project. A project that benefits the community in some way. This is what the scouts do. He did not purposely go out and work behind the scene to close shop on a union, unlike what the union does to those who want to work without the oversight of an oppressive group that wants a legalised cut of their paycheck for nothing. No instead a group of volunteers from his peers to those parents and other VOLUNTEERS from the community went out and helped.

So you are upset that 39 members of your thug cult are collecting unemployment and are on the dole. This sounds to me like instead of demanding more money for wages maybe you ought to think about doing a few cuts. Cut back your Cadillac health care plans and maybe donate a day or two a month to the city in community spirit. The childish picking on a boy scout for doing a job that should have been done is not only wrong but pathetic. Much like your union! The city should be commended for saving money on a volunteer project that benefited the city.

Nicky grow up and show some leadership your self.

The stage is being carefully crafted now. The script rewritten in favor of a defense for this TERRORIST. The excuses and blame being pushed off the man who pulled the trigger and placed upon everyone else.

As more and more facts are reviled about how this terrorist was allowed to stay in the military and promoted out of fear of a political witch hunt and backlash, the safety of America is being replaced with active capitulation to those who will kill us.

The line of excuse makers is growing including FOX news. As the terms of psychotic, abused, picked on, and conservative Muslim are being bandied about. The defense legal team is circling the wagons in an effort to ensure that this TERRORIST will not be punished.

Yes he will initially be tried in a military court but he will never see the punishment befitting a traitor, subversive, anti American pile of crap that he is. He will be taken away from justice and placed in the federal justice system where he will be released in a few years after more p.c. baiters will claim he is a changed, well man.

What needs to be done is let him stand trial like any other military personal and face the firring squad.

It is from the TERRORIST play book to claim insanity from the get go when they fail to die in their attacks against innocents. The North Carolina car man who drove through Chapel Hill was deemed insane. The shooter in Seattle who targeted Jews, and a pregnant woman, was deemed insane. The 9/11 attackers are said now to have been insane. One could easily make the connection from the legal defenses that all Muslims and the faith of Islam is insane according to political correctness.

I pray that I am wrong, but I make this prediction. That this filth will never see the death penalty. He will never face an execution for his crimes. Crimes that if there ever was one calls for the death penalty to be enforced. This goat herding Camel Jockey will do no more then a max of ten years in a cushy federal pen some where then be released.

A complete and total lack of justice.

As we wake up this morning are we safer. Is the world a better place for our children now that the madman, John Allen Muhammad, the mastermind of the 2002 Beltway Sniper attacks, is no longer with us.

At 8:58 Tuesday night, this plotting anti life convert was lead into his final room of life. There he was mercifully put to sleep and died. The only witnesses were his lawyers, government officials , and the victims families. As this mad dog was let off easy in his death many are no asking the questions of "what about our humanity," or "is this Constitutional?".

The questions that need to be addressed are not those at all. What about those who he helped to MURDER? What about the grief and misery he brought to dozens, and the fear he placed the east coast into?

As the bleeding hearts begin their cries of this being inhuman, and cruel punishment, the cry of justice should be celebrated and repeated. The lack of caring for those who had their RIGHT to life snuffed out is unfathomable. Unfortunately many of the victims families do not feel a sense of justice or closure to their pain.

"He died very peacefully, much more than most of his victims," said Paul Ebert, the Virginia prosecutor who won the death penalty conviction. A true statement if there was one for this atrocity.

If it is unconstitutional to sentence one to death then is it not unconstitutional to murder someone under the same principle? So what should the punishment be? Just a smack on the hand and a promise not to do it again? If it is cruel and unusual punishment is not the taking of another life by any means the same? I doubt if those bleeding hearts ever consider this.

The answer to is it cruel and inhumane is a resounding NOPE. We put these murders down in a very mercifully way. We allow them to close their eyes and go to an endless sleep. Something that they do not do for their victims. It says a lot about society and civilization. It says that we as humanity do not tolerate the taking of life unjustly and senselessly. That there will be repercussions to ones actions.

A civilization and societies within have to have some sort of order and rule of law. Punishment without any real teeth breeds contempt for our fellow man and society in general.

Let us hope that the murdering jihadist Maj. Nidal Hasan will see justice in a military court martial and not protection from an Obama administration.

In political correct side talk, Gov. Bill Ritter sends his budget proposal to the Colorado State Legislature and says we all have to sacrifice. Yet he skims over why he asks the tax payers of the Mile High State to pony up more money in excessive new taxes on items like candy, soda, and online sales. Gov.Ritter goes after small businesses as well by proposing cuts, and the elimination of certain tax breaks that aid small business.

The truth is as plain as the nose on our faces. Here we have a state government that went from a surplus of funds under a Republican lead legislature to one that has wasted and mismanaged tax funds and now is deeply in debt. Should we be surprised? No this is how tax and spend democrats run government. Do not worry about funds we will tax the hell out of the citizenry to make up the shortfall. Our funds our unlimited, or so the leftists think.

It is only fitting that on the twentieth anniversary of the falling of the Berlin Wall. A wall that symbolised oppression on one side and freedom on the other. It is only right that we listen to the one man who is the one who in truth put an end to the cold war. This is the man who brought forth real hope and change from stagnation and made Americans proud to be Americans again.

Let us listen to the voice of American Pride. The words that brought Europe out of oppression and into the Free World.

President Ronald Wilson Reagan

In an extraordinary vote that went 220 to 215, legislation that will put an end to individual health care and produce the largest government invasion into the personnel lives of the American citizenry has made a step closer to becoming real.

The 1,990 page of socialist aggression to wards capitalism and individual choice was passed after hours of argument. While conservatives in both the democratic and republican parties pointed out how this bill will force Americans out of private health care decisions and into a government run system of bureaucracy.

Who are the real winners and who are the losers with this legislation? It is the socialist who want to dictate how we live our lives who have won. As this bill punishes the American family who already is struggling to pay bills under a left leaning agenda that hinders personnel responsibility and replaces it with mandates of higher taxes and fewer freedoms.

The losers are those who struggle to be responsible and do the right thing. As government run by the left and for the left. Treat the citizenry as children. Letting us know that we are unable to make the correct decisions for our selves and families.

The ramifications of this passage opens the door all the way for nanny ism of our lives. Next up is what we can eat, say and what we do. The attack on free speech is being covert as the FCC Czar is backs dooring policies, the unfair fairness in broadcasting act.

As the left celebrates their next step on the road of dismantling and voiding the Constitution. The American people move another step down the road to a debt that can not ever be paid off.

As we have seen and it has been proven. The government has not the ability to run anything. Social Security and Medicare are on the verge of being forever bankrupted. Why, because they are not overseen properly, filled with fraud, and run by the government.

With a mandate to the people to buy, a clear overstepping of authority granted by the Constitution. The American people are being forced into servitude with higher taxes. That is what this is. Make no illusion about this. The "fees" are a tax on the people. There is no fee for our benefit. It forces the American people, small businesses and corporations to put an end to a segment of our economy and force monies into mismanaged coffers of the government.

Remember that our elected officials do not have to participate in this health plan. That they get to keep their Cadillac policies that will not be available anymore to the average Joe.
A violation in itself of the Constitution which says that Congress will not have or be entitled to anything that the public cannot have.

America is dying and we have elected our executioners. The left is entrenched into office and doing all they can to destroy a once great nation. As our schools dumb down education in favor of social agenda policies. New taxation's and social policies. Our Founding Fathers our spinning in their graves. It truly is a sad day for America and for Freedom.

What Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi thinks is affordable is a lie. In her mind a $15,000 a year bill is no problem for a family making $30,000.00 a year. Half your pay to health care is responsible, and that is before taxes. Oh yeah if you are not responsible she thinks government will make you responsible with jail time.

The oppressive morons in Washington just do not get it. This is not the reform we want. It does not come close to any sort of reform but a heavy handed tax and dictatorship of the once free American Citizenry.

Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released yesterday a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes it explicitly clear that Americans who do not maintain what they (dems decide as)“acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.

Key excerpts from the JCT letter appear below:

“H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]
“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]

“Criminal penalties

Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:

• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

Do you understand what this actually says? It says that if you do not buy the governments program (which will without a doubt put an end to private health insurance). You are going to go to jail. How many parts of the Constitution does this violate? What sort of Republic Democracy, one that we are supposed to be, supports such tyranny from its elected officials.

This is oppression right out of Cuba or any other third world dictatorship. This is what your "hope and change" President is pushing for. A mandated program that we cannot afford.

Even Economist think this plan is bad for the economy. From the Washington Post,
Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard University, president emeritus of the nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research, and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers from 1982 to 1984, writes that the Administration plan could "have the unintended consequence of raising health insurance premiums and causing a decline in the number of people with insurance":

A key feature of the House and Senate health bills would prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to anyone with preexisting conditions. The new coverage would start immediately, and the premium could not reflect the individual's health condition. This well-intentioned feature would provide a strong incentive for someone who is healthy to drop his or her health insurance, saving the substantial premium costs. After all, if serious illness hit this person or a family member, he could immediately obtain coverage. As healthy individuals decline coverage in this way, insurance companies would come to have a sicker population. The higher cost of insuring that group would force insurers to raise their premiums. (Separate accident policies might develop to deal with the risk of high-cost care after accidents when there is insufficient time to buy insurance.)

The higher premium level would cause others who are currently insured to drop coverage, pushing premiums even higher. The result would be a spiral of rising premiums and shrinking numbers of insured.

(the full column) Washington Post

If you think that it is just the rich that will be hit with the new health debacle taxes. Check out how many of them have more then enough money to pay. Even though they are excluded from the common working American family in having to settle for their proposed health care.

237 Millionaires in Congress.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29235.html

Nidal Hasan is the Major in the United States Army who wigged out and shot over 40 people. Killing at least 13, one of which was the female officer who shot him.

Now the first thoughts that came out were is this man a plant for terrorist organizations and was his attack part of some larger plan. Are there more Muslims in the military that are going to go on shooting sprees?

Then we have heard that this man fired any where from 44 to 50 plus rounds in his shooting spree. This high number of rounds has prompted many to say that there has to have been a second or even a third shooter. Well to put this in perspective. Anyone who shoots semi auto handguns knows that it is quit possible to fire this high volume from two semi auto pistols. Just a note on this. My Smith and Wesson 9m has a 16 round magazine. It takes me less then three seconds to drop the empty mag and insert and load a second. In less then one minute I can easily fire 33 rounds from this. Aha, you say 16 plus 16 is only thirty two so I am wrong. Wait, for it .... BING. Answer is that in the first firing I have 17 rounds in the pistol because in addition to a loaded clip there is one round in the chamber. With a little practice it is very easy to fire three magazines in a minute. Now I am already up to 49 rounds. Let us not forget that it is said he had a second hand gun as well. Now the caliber has not been released or the make and model of the handguns used.

Claims in Nadal's defense are saying that he was picked upon and made fun of do to his ethnic background, Jordanian. I find this very hard to believe as he was and is a Major in the Army. As a matter of fact the Arny in their investigation of his complaint did not find any evidence of this as well. It is not like he was some high school senior class nerd that was being picked upon by sophomore jocks. In the military I find it hard to believe he was picked upon like he has asserted.

We also know that Nidal received a bad proficiency report while he was stationed in Washington at Walter Reed Hospital. As to exactly why he was given a bad report has not been released. However we learned that Major Nidal Hasan made many comments on foreign policy. His position being what we consider not mainstream even for those left of center politically.

Then there are the Internet postings that are coming to light. Ones in which we have to consider how was this man ever given a license to practice psychology in the first place.

NidalHasan scribbled: There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah (SWT) knows best.

This conclusion is flawed from the beginning. To say that an act that takes life premeditated is the same as an act that sacrifices one life to save many is absurd. The moral equivalence just is not there.

The last thing I will comment on here is the aspect that he did not want to be deployed to the Middle East, be it Iraq or Afghanistan. So what, do you think that every last military person wants to be deployed to a combat zone? Nope, not even. If he did not want to be deployed he most definitely could have prolonged his orders with legal maneuvers. Claim he is a pacifist, or consciences objector. Being a Major he definitely could have gone out of the box and invoked the media with the aid of a CAIR lawyer and gotten out of this deployment. So I am finding it hard to buy that this was the reason for the shooting spree.

The race in New York 23 has one clear message above all others. One that needs to be heard and reverberated through out this nation. This message is this.

RINO'S YOU ARE ON YOUR WAY OUT.

If any thing can be taken from this campaign it is that those who are Republicans in name only your time is numbered. Your lack of backbone, common sense economically and morally, the lies of the left you support, and the oppression that socialism brings is coming to an end. That conservatism and capitalism are alive and well in the Republican party, as in America itself.

That is the message that is being sent in my opinion.

Today's election results in the State of Virginia are not a route, they are a spanking in favor of Republicans. The Democratic candidates are sent home with their tales between their legs wondering what the license plate number of the Mac truck that hit them was.

However is this a as many pundits are claiming, a referendum on President Obama? In my opinion, unfortunately it is not. I wish it were true as I agree 1000% with Rush Limbaugh's analysis of the man. An arrogant, narcissistic man child. One with a 5 minute political career.

What this election does show is that the electorate is waking up and reality is setting in on the policies that the Democratic party or the leftists are trying to ram down our throats. It is the people coming forth and saying we do not support socialism.

As the pundits fall all over themselves on the stats of what ethnic group and political affiliations voted which way. Or as to who did or did not vote. The bottom line of this is that people voted for a return to common sense and values that this country was founded upon.

Fundamentals that say an honest days pay for an honest days work. No taxation with out representation. Sure many voted for "hope and change", yet not this type of change where they hope taxes leave them some of their change after they get their paychecks.

People are not supporting policies that overall around this nation are failing policies. People want to run their own lives and not the lives that leftists think that they should live.

That's my opinion anyways.